Council, Mayor At Odds Over City Attorney
Council wants to hire its own attorney. City Attorney oppose this and Barrett vetoes proposal.
In the city’s 2022 budget, the council cut one of 35 assistant city attorney positions from Spencer’s 2022 budget and gave itself an attorney position with a $70,000 per-year budget.
“The change proposed in the Council’s amendment does not improve the quality, depth, or coordination or legal services for the City,” wrote the mayor. “The amendment also puts the City’s Charter at odds with State law.”
It’s not the first time Barrett has inserted himself in the Spencer-Council fight. He vetoed a July resolution that stripped Spencer of his mandatory review of any contract valued at $25,000 or more.
But the council unanimously overrode that veto, sending a message that it wasn’t pleased Spencer had refused to sign the revised The Couture deal and created for himself an unreviewable veto. The council also approved spending $100,000 to hire an attorney and a third party to determine if it acted appropriately, with Spencer arguing against using in-house attorneys.
Barrett might have more luck this time.
The council attorney budget amendment was adopted on a 9-5 vote. It needs 10 votes to override a mayoral veto.
Ald. Khalif Rainey was absent from the budget vote, but based on past voting patterns is likely to vote to sustain Barrett’s veto. Inside the council, the Spencer fight has hardened on racial lines, with the Black council members backing Spencer with one exception. It’s the same division that resulted in Cavalier Johnson, the exception, becoming council president.
The council will take up the veto at its next scheduled meeting, November 23.
Another thing the council is likely to vote on at that meeting is a proposal to amend the city charter to enact the attorney provision. The Judiciary & Legislation Committee recommended approval of the change on a 3-2 vote Monday with council members Ashanti Hamilton and Nikiya Dodd in opposition.
Spencer is maintaining his opposition to the change. In a letter to the council, Spencer said the council’s action to hire an in-house “special counsel” doesn’t comply with the state statute the council is relying on and said the council should instead hire an outside attorney when it disagrees with another city department. “At the very least, this matter deserves more study and consideration,” he wrote.
Barrett raised the specter that if the council prevails, it could result in many departments getting their own attorneys.
“Based on the Council’s logic, a much stronger argument could be made to give the Fire & Police Commission, the Police Department, and the Department of Neighborhood Services their own independent attorneys based solely on the volume of work. The Mayor’s Office could certainly be assigned an attorney, as could the Comptroller and Treasurer,” wrote Barrett.
But at least one member of the Common Council thinks the Department of City Development is already functioning with its own attorney. Following Spencer’s election, deputy city attorney Mary Schanning transitioned to filling the role of a real estate compliance liaison officer within DCD. A member of the City Attorney’s Office still serves as the official attorney for DCD, unlike what the council is proposing for itself.
On Tuesday morning, after this article was first published, Schanning presented an updated development agreement to the Zoning, Neighborhoods & Development Committee.
“So you were practicing law within the Department of City Development?” asked Ald. Robert Bauman.
“I was drafting a document which a lawyer does not need to do,” said Schanning.
Bauman noted that Barrett did not veto the creation of her position.
“By the way, you’re a very good attorney. We should make that known for the record,” said Bauman.
“You’re so not bad yourself,” responded Schanning.
The attorney veto was the only veto issued by Barrett for the 2022 budget.
The section on the Department of City Development was updated after publication.
- City Hall: The Council’s War With Tearman Spencer - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 23rd, 2021
- City Hall: Council, Mayor At Odds Over City Attorney - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 16th, 2021
- City Hall: Milwaukee Adopts ‘Calm Before The Storm’ 2022 Budget - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 5th, 2021
- City Hall: Committee Recommends Few Budget Amendments - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 28th, 2021
- City Hall: ARPA Funding May Delay City’s Fiscal Cliff Says Policy Forum - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 19th, 2021
- City Hall: Homicides, Shootings, Auto Thefts All At Record Highs - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 11th, 2021
- Groups Call For Defunding the Police To Solve Milwaukee Pension Crisis - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 1st, 2021
- City Hall: 12 Takeaways From City’s 2022 Budget - Jeramey Jannene - Sep 22nd, 2021
- City Hall: Barrett Unveils 2022 Budget Proposal - Jeramey Jannene - Sep 21st, 2021
- City Hall: 2022 City Budget Process Kicks Off - Jeramey Jannene - Aug 17th, 2021
Read more about 2022 Milwaukee buget here
- How Will Council Handle Scathing Report on City Attorney? - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2023
- City Attorney Spencer Faces Inspector’s Call For Ouster, Likely Violation Of Discrimination Law - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 9th, 2023
- City Hall: Another Former Assistant City Attorney Files Discrimination Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 20th, 2023
- City Hall: Former City Attorneys File Discrimination Claims - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2022
- City Hall: City Faces $9.5 Million In Legal Claims - Jeramey Jannene - May 4th, 2022
- City Hall: DNS Could Drop City Attorney, Hire Its Own - Jeramey Jannene - Apr 12th, 2022
- City Hall: City Attorney Halts Plan To Sue Reckless Drivers - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 22nd, 2022
- City Hall: Spencer Faces Sex Discrimination Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 22nd, 2022
- City Hall: More Turnover In City Attorney’s Office - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 9th, 2022
- City Hall: Putin-Backing Assistant City Attorney Fired - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 28th, 2022
Read more about Turmoil at the City Attorney's Office here