11 Streetcar Lawsuits Coming
City poised to deny claim by motorcyclist, clearing way for first of 11 lawsuits.
W. St. Paul Ave. streetcar track during route construction in 2017. Photo by Jeramey Jannene.
A lawsuit over an injury suffered by a motorcyclist riding over streetcar tracks embedded in a city street could finally be headed to court. Actually 11 of them.
Last August, Hupy & Abraham S.C. announced it was filing a notice of injury against the City of Milwaukee. The firm, on behalf of Kenosha resident DuWayne D. Criter, is seeking $50,000 in compensation for damages. Criter was allegedly heading east on W. St. Paul Ave. when he attempted to change lanes to turn north on Water St. and had the front wheel of his motorcycle get caught in the gap between the rail and street resulting in a crash.
The claim, a precursor to a lawsuit, is set to be denied by the city. A letter from independently-elected City Attorney Grant Langley and Deputy City Attorney Jan Smokowicz to the Common Council states: “There is no evidence that the City was negligent.”
Relying on a statement from the Department of Public Works Infrastructure Services Division, the city’s counsel writes “the streetcar tracks at West St. Paul Avenue and North Plankinton Avenue were constructed in accordance with the standard specifications, plans and accepted standards for streetcar infrastructure.” The work was performed for the city by infrastructure contractor Kiewet.
“This is par for the course. It’s what we expected and we are going to now file lawsuits,” said attorney Michael Hupy in an interview. The attorney said he believes a Hupy-initiated advertising campaign in advance of Harley-Davidson‘s 115th-anniversary celebration prevented additional accidents. “There hasn’t been one accident since the Harley 115th that I’m aware of,” said Hupy. He said the city failed to provide adequate notice of the track’s installation.
The law firm still has 10 claims pending for other motorcyclists and bicyclists before the city, and the attorney expects them all to be denied. He intends to file a lawsuit for each case. Hupy & Abraham has represented over 4,000 motorcyclists in court since its founding in the 1960s.
“This is not the first time in history someone has sued over an injury caused by an engineering feature,” said streetcar proponent, attorney and area alderman Robert Bauman in an interview with Urban Milwaukee. Referencing everything from metal bridge plates to concrete curbs, Bauman said: “the law is pretty well settled.” But the case could end up in the increasingly partisan Wisconsin Supreme Court acknowledged the alderman, who said the political nature of the streetcar could impact the outcome.
How soon will we know? “Maybe we will have a decision in three to four years,” said Bauman.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.
Related Legislation: File 190006
More about the Milwaukee Streetcar
For more project details, including the project timeline, financing, route and possible extensions, see our extensive past coverage.
- Transportation: Should Milwaukee Stop The Hop? - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 13th, 2020
- Transportation: The Hop Now Wears a Mask - Jeramey Jannene - Aug 18th, 2020
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Is A Couture Deal Finally Coming? - Jeramey Jannene - May 13th, 2020
- Transportation: SUV Driver Runs Into The Hop - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 28th, 2020
- Transportation: Streetcar Kiosks Could Bring In $500,000 Annually - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 20th, 2020
- Thanks A Million, Hop Riders! - The Hop - Feb 19th, 2020
- Transportation: We Energies Will Sponsor Streetcar - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 10th, 2020
- Transportation: Streetcar Ridership Up in January Versus 2019 - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 7th, 2020
- Transportation: Streetcar Ridership Up in December - Jeramey Jannene - Jan 14th, 2020
- Transportation: Ridership Falls for The Hop - Jeramey Jannene - Dec 16th, 2019
Read more about Milwaukee Streetcar here
“He (Hupy) said the city failed to provide adequate notice of the track’s installation.”
Is Mr. Hupy trying to suggest that the operator of the motorcycle did not have a responsibility to be aware of the conditions under which he was operating the motorcycle?
These plaintiffs have a powerful case. The City should be very nervous and begin to set aside reserves for a huge settlement. It reminds me of the scene in the film Philadelphia where a potential client talks to the ambulance chasing lawyer played by Denzel Washington. The lawyer says to the potential plaintiff something like, “Let me see if I’ve got this straight. You wanted to cross the street. There were barricades that said “Danger: do not cross here.” There were other signs, but you went under the barricades and fell in the hole and hurt your leg. Do I have that right?” The potential plaintiff, “Yes, that’s exactly right. Do I have a case?” The ambulance chaser, “Oh, yes, you have an excellent case.”
Many years ago, I wrecked a motorcycle by failing to take an adequate angle over trolley tracks in Bellingham, Washington. I did not sue anybody. I understood that the accident was entirely my fault.
The notion that the city did not adequately inform motorists of the tracks is absurd. Mayor Barrett secured funding for the streetcar decades before it carried a passenger. He secured that funding when he was a U.S. Congressman in the 1980’s. Reactionaries stalled the implementation of the streetcar for so many years that anybody in Milwaukee who did not see it coming had his or her head in some nether region.