Isiah Holmes

Closing Arguments Delivered On Jay Anderson’s Killing

Attorney says former Tosa police officer should be charged with second degree reckless homicide.

By , Wisconsin Examiner - May 20th, 2021 12:17 pm
Jay Anderson Sr. (left) and Linda Anderson (right), the parents of Jay Anderson Jr. Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner.

Jay Anderson Sr. (left) and Linda Anderson (right), the parents of Jay Anderson Jr. Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner.

Judge Glenn Yamahiro heard closing arguments Wednesday in the John Doe hearing into the killing of Jay Anderson, Jr. In 2016, the 25-year-old was fatally shot by former Wauwatosa police officer Joseph Mensah, the officer’s second fatal shooting within a year. While the past three John Doe hearings were deep dives into the case, the closing arguments tied it all together.

Attorney Kimberley Motley, who represents the Anderson family, noted that Jay Anderson himself was the most important witness to the shooting. “His name was Jay Anderson, Jr.,” said Motley during her opening remarks. “He was the eldest son to Linda and Jay Anderson, who have two other children. He was engaged to Starkeisha Delarosa, and they have a beautiful daughter, Jaylin Anderson, who just turned 6 years old. He was a hard worker, he worked as a cook at Ruby Tuesday, and he often helped his father with landscaping jobs. He’s affectionately known by his family and friends as ‘Baby Jay.’”

Motley noted that during the John Doe hearing, “we have talked to six different people in law enforcement.” Those included former MPD homicide detective Ricky Burems, former MPD Pamela Holmes, WPD’s out-going chief Barry Weber, a WPD lieutenant, and others. “Collectively, they all represent 179 years in law enforcement,” Motley said. “And collectively they have only ever fired their weapon twice, with zero fatalities among our numerous witnesses.” By contrast, Motley pointed out, Mensah fired his weapon 19 times during his five years at WPD, killing three people over a five year period.

Motley argued that Anderson’s bullet wounds support the case that Anderson was not challenging or lunging at Mensah. She pointed to other factors, including Anderson holding up his hands and communicating with Mensah, that she said showed he was being cooperative. At least one expert testified that the wounds and bullet holes in the vehicle support the notion that Anderson couldn’t have been lunging.

The civil rights attorney wrapped up her closing arguments within 47 minutes, mirroring the amount of time Mensah was interviewed by MPD investigators. “We believe that there is probable cause to charge Joseph Mensah with second degree reckless homicide. We believe that there is probable cause to charge Joseph Mensah with homicide by negligent handling of a dangerous weapon. We believe that there’s more than probable cause that we’ve demonstrated to the court. And we’ve used our 47 minutes to clear the record.”

Judge Yamahiro is expected to announce his decision whether to appoint a special prosecutor to take on the case on June 25, at 9 a.m.

Reprinted with permission of Wisconsin Examiner.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us