Wisconsin GOP Lawmakers Praise Trump’s Order Limiting Funding For ‘Gain-of-Function’ Research
The order's impact on pathogenic research at universities like UW-Madison is not yet known.
Sen. Andre Jacque, R-De Pere, is seen during Gov. Tony Evers’ State of the State address at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, Wis., on Feb. 15, 2022. Coburn Dukehart/Wisconsin Watch
Some state Republican lawmakers hope President Donald Trump’s recent executive order restricting funding for so-called “gain-of-function” research will accomplish their goal of clamping down on what they see as dangerous pathogen studies in Wisconsin.
Gain-of-function research includes experiments that could make viruses or other pathogens more transmissible or better at causing disease. The concern, amplified by the COVID-19 lab leak theory, is the stronger microbes could escape the lab and cause a pandemic.
Trump’s order restricts federal funding for gain-of-function research in “countries of concern (e.g., China)” and calls on federal officials to halt funding for U.S. studies in the field while they draft strict oversight plans.
“Gain-of-function research that makes pathogens more dangerous has always carried unacceptable risks with questionable benefits,” said state Sen. André Jacque, R-New Franken. “President Trump’s leadership is putting science back on a responsible path, one that safeguards Americans from the possibility of a future lab-generated pandemic.”
The precise impacts on Wisconsin research are not yet known. But Jacque is hopeful the executive order will lead to National Institutes of Health guidelines that restrict this type of research in the state.
“We can strengthen our protocols, make sure that there’s greater awareness of what’s going on,” Jacque said. “I think this is an important step forward in transparency and scientific integrity, and in terms of making sure that we’re really doing things the right way.”
Jacque and colleagues like Sen. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater, and Rep. Elijah Behnke, R-Chase, authored a letter to Trump in February, asking him to take federal action against gain-of-function research. Jacque also championed legislation aimed at ending the research at higher education institutions in Wisconsin. The bill failed to pass in 2024.
In support of greater oversight, some researchers traveled to Wisconsin to testify in support of Jacque’s bill.
“Wisconsin has been a flashpoint for this,” Jacque said.
Still, other researchers argue broad restrictions on gain-of-function research could stifle studies that could ultimately protect people from risky viruses. The University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Medical College of Wisconsin testified against the bill last year.
“Gain-of-function experiments allow investigators to understand the complex nature of host-pathogen interactions that underlie transmission, infection, and pathogenesis and can help attribute biological function to genes and proteins,” a UW-Madison spokesperson said in a statement to WPR.
UW-Madison conducts a wide range of health and disease studies, including research that helps track viruses like avian influenza. The university is assessing how the order and related NIH guidance might affect research on campus, the spokesperson said.
“This research also contributes to the development of treatments and vaccines to protect humans, plants and animals from diseases that pose risks to public health and the food supply,” the spokesperson said.
Their researchers undergo extensive biosafety training and are required to wear protective gear, the spokesperson added. The facilities also have security protocols and are outfitted with purification systems.
David Letzer is a doctor with the Infectious Disease Specialists of Southeastern Wisconsin. He said while he doesn’t run a lab, he could see how the executive order could stifle research in the state.
“There’s not levels of risk, or classification of risk,” Letzer said.
However, he said more oversight of gain-of-function research could be a good thing. But unlike the sweeping restrictions and funding halts called for in Trump’s executive order, the oversight should leave room for nuance, he added.
Jacque said he’d consider reviving past legislation against gain-of-function research, depending on how the federal guidelines pan out.
Wisconsin GOP lawmakers praise Trump order restricting funds for ‘gain-of-function’ research was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
Began reading this article. Got to paragraph 4 where the Andre Jacque quote begins “President Trump’s leadership”.
Had to stop reading to wipe the tears of laughter from my eyes.
Republican decision defies logic. Legislators are not Scientists. Stay in your own lane!
Gain of function research is intended to reveal targets to better predict emerging infectious diseases and to develop vaccines and therapeutics. (Wikipedia)
So the RRRs (radical reactional republicans) are at it again. They erroneously believe the nonsense that COVID was the result of a leak from a lab in China. This is the same illogic that gave us, the plane and helicopter crash was the result of DEI hires. Here are the facts:
(1) COVID had gone around the world before the breakout in Wuhan. What happened in Wuhan was the tipping point when the virus went from just a new strain to a pandemic.
(2) If we are to prepare for the next deadly virus, we had better have a better understanding of how these infectious diseases develop.
(3) The effective safeguards are in place at research labs across the US to prevent the accidental release of new pathogens.
RRRs and HWSNBN are not scientists nor are they ethicists–academics that address the need to balance scientific discovery with its impact on life. What’s more, legislating by executive order is the antithesis of good government. HWSNBN executive order is based on illogical fears and stupidity. This executive order will NOT protect the American people. It will leave us totally unprepared for the next pandemic.
mkwagner:
Great post! I would like to add this:
Legislating by executive order is not only the antithesis of good government (as you stated), it is the antithesis of democracy. It is the hallmark of an authoritarian, or dare I say “king”.
We aren’t there yet, but each day it seems we inch closer to having a demagogic dictator in the White House instead of a president.