City, County Will Study Merging Services
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos pushing for this as prerequisite for more shared revenue for Milwaukee.
The City of Milwaukee buys toilet paper, Milwaukee County buys toilet paper. Could the two governmental units save money by doing it together?
It’s one of hundreds of potential shared operational options the Wisconsin Policy Forum is poised to study on their behalf.
“Saving money is a primary objective,” said policy forum president Rob Henken to the Finance & Personnel Committee on Wednesday. “But this is also about how to improve services.”
“Both the county and us are dealing with the same issue, so we can’t leave any stone unturned,” said Mayor Cavalier Johnson‘s policy director Molly King.
The city and county face significant financial issues because of declining state shared revenue and state-imposed revenue restrictions,
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) recently said he won’t consider granting the entities new revenue sources unless they consider privatizing or sharing services.
The study, which will run parallel to a Greater Milwaukee Committee study on the city’s operations, is expected to take 12 to 14 months to complete. The city would allocate $20,000 to what WPF’s proposal says would cost $48,600.
Intergovernmental Relations Division director Jim Bohl said that, based on conversations with legislative leaders, the timeline would work. He said the effort would take time to identify legal barriers and logistical considerations.
Hypothetical efficiency examples offered by Henken and King included sharing budget office analysts, establishing joint procurement processes or merging hiring and training operations. The focus, they said, is on “back office” functions.
But Alderwoman Milele A. Coggs and Alderman Mark Chambers, Jr. were quick to express concern that the study could be a gateway to something bigger: a metropolitan government.
“I am not trying to bring the governments together. I am trying to work together where it makes sense,” she said.
Chambers was more direct. “I think this is a gateway to look towards merging,” he said. “This $20,000 is basically giving the green light to look into merging the city and county.”
Committee chair Marina Dimitrijevic, a co-sponsor on the effort with Council President Jose G. Perez, said it is about operations, not governance. She said it was important that the council is the one allocating the funding, giving it a seat at the table.
“This administration has a chance to do what wasn’t done in the past,” said Perez. “I think this an opportunity to take some of these things a little more seriously.”
Coggs would like to see the study expanded to include Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS).
King said the school district wasn’t immediately included because the city and county are already so similar and citizens struggle to differentiate between what services are provided by which entity. But she was open to including them.
Perez said he was open to including MPS, but has had limited success with outreach in the past. But he said he supports including the school district and said outreach would be made before the Jan. 17 council meeting.
The committee voted 3-0-2 to recommend funding the study, with Chambers and Coggs abstaining. The alderwoman said she would consider voting for the measure when the full council considers the proposal on Jan. 17 if MPS is included.
About That 2018 Study
Ald. Michael Murphy, the council’s longest-tenured member, raised concern that the effort could ignore a 42-page Intergovernmental Relations Division report from 2018 that listed current informal arrangements and opportunities for future collaboration.
“This is a topic that has been going on since before me and it always comes down to ‘I don’t want to give it up, you give it up,'” he said. Murphy has been on the council since 1989.
The report went department by department analyzing the often-informal shared services between the city and county. It also examined opportunities for partnerships. For instance, the city and county each maintain their own land management software system, but the city is already reliant on the county to keep track of land ownership.
Murphy said it was important the study partners do things correctly; if not the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Legislature will step in.
“I bet one million bucks they’re doing open records request about what analysis has been done in the past so they can do it,” said Murphy of the legislators.
“I want to remind us all, and the public, that we are being watched closely and we are in a fight for our lives,” said Ald. JoCasta Zamarripa.
Milwaukee County is to pay the remaining balance of the study’s costs. WPF will also be making an in-kind contribution to complete the study.
UPDATE: Chambers originally voted against the proposal, then sought to change his vote to an abstention later in the meeting. He was granted unanimous consent to do so.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the Local Government Fiscal Crisis
- Mayor Johnson’s Budget Hikes Fees, Taxes In 2025, Maintains Services - Jeramey Jannene - Sep 24th, 2024
- New Milwaukee Sales Tax Collections Slow, But Comptroller Isn’t Panicking - Jeramey Jannene - Jun 28th, 2024
- Milwaukee’s Credit Rating Upgraded To A+ - Jeramey Jannene - May 13th, 2024
- City Hall: Sales Tax Helps Fire Department Add Paramedics, Fire Engine - Jeramey Jannene - Jan 8th, 2024
- New Study Analyzes Ways City, County Could Share Services, Save Money - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 17th, 2023
- New Third-Party Study Suggests How Milwaukee Could Save Millions - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 17th, 2023
- Murphy’s Law: How David Crowley Led on Sales Tax - Bruce Murphy - Aug 23rd, 2023
- MKE County: Supervisors Engage in the Great Sales Tax Debate - Graham Kilmer - Jul 28th, 2023
- MKE County: County Board Approves Sales Tax - Graham Kilmer - Jul 27th, 2023
- County Executive David Crowley Celebrates County Board Vote to Secure Fiscal Future and Preserve Critical Services for Most Vulnerable Residents - County Executive David Crowley - Jul 27th, 2023
Read more about Local Government Fiscal Crisis here
Political Contributions Tracker
Displaying political contributions between people mentioned in this story. Learn more.
- May 5, 2015 - José G. Pérez received $10 from Cavalier Johnson
- May 5, 2015 - José G. Pérez received $100 from JoCasta Zamarripa
You Vos is not going to live up to his side of the offer. Robin Nazi Vos can’t be trusted.
The city/county fiscal problems are too deep to be solved by just getting a deal on janitorial supplies. Years of underfunding and deferred maintenance (the latter is especially acute on the county’s side) can’t be solved by simply coordinating/sharing some services.
What ever happened to this?
I do not believe the study has been completed. It was referenced by WPF in its annual budget brief.