Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Counts
He faced five charges, including first degree homicide, for shootings during 2020 protests in Kenosha.
Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty on all charges stemming from his shooting of three people and killing two during police protests in Kenosha last year.
A jury of what appeared to be seven white women, four white men and one man of color took nearly four days to render their verdicts. The original jury pool included 18 people, but was reduced to 12 people Tuesday morning when Rittenhouse used an old-fashioned wooden tumbler and pulled six jurors’ numbers to serve as alternates.
His mother, Wendy Rittenhouse, sat in the courtroom throughout the more than two-week trial. The Rittenhouse family appeared in the court for the first time Friday since Monday. They immediately left after the verdict was read.
The family of the men Rittenhouse killed, Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, held hands while sitting in the courtroom, appearing shocked and heartbroken while hearing the not guilty verdicts being ticked off one by one.
Huber’s parents didn’t attend the trial because it was too difficult to repeatedly watch a video of their son being killed, they said in a statement released after the verdict. The outcome of the trial sets a dangerous precedent, they said.
“It sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street. We hope that decent people will join us in forcefully rejecting that message and demanding more of our laws, our officials and our justice system,” they said.
They love their son, and they’re proud of him for sacrificing his life to protect others, they added.
Some family of Jacob Blake, the Black man who was shot by Kenosha police on Aug. 23, 2020, two days before Rittenhouse came to Kenosha, was outside the courthouse while the verdict was read. Justin Blake, Jacob’s uncle, was there during the trial and verdict.
Earlier this week, Justin said he wanted people to focus on the two men killed by Rittenhouse.
As the verdict was read, the crowd outside the courthouse began to swell. Vehicles began to drive by honking, and some people expressed happiness with the verdict. Three helicopters hovered above.
One person driving past the courthouse yelled “Justice served American style.”
“The jury, representing our community, has rendered its verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case,” said lead prosecutor Thomas Binger. “While we are disappointed with the verdict, it must be respected. We are grateful to the members of the jury for their diligent and thoughtful deliberations. The Kenosha community has endured much over the past 15 months, and yet we remain resilient and strong.”
He asked community members to express their feelings about the verdict in a peaceful manner.
Last Friday, Gov. Tony Evers authorized 500 Wisconsin Army National Guard troops to be ready to come to Kenosha to support local police.
Rittenhouse initially faced seven criminal charges but Kenosha Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed a misdemeanor charge of possession of a dangerous weapon by a minor Monday. Rittenhouse’s defense attorneys argued a Wisconsin statute prohibiting minors from possessing firearms includes an exemption if a rifle or shotgun is of a certain length. Schroeder agreed. A curfew charge was dismissed last week.
Prosecutors and defense attorneys presented radically different depictions of Rittenhouse’s actions and motivations on the evening of Aug. 25, 2020, when he shot and killed Rosenbaum and Huber, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz. Prosecutors called him a “chaos tourist” whose recklessness cost two lives. Defense attorneys described him as “a 17-year-old kid out there trying to help this community.”
The five remaining charges included:
- Count 1: Rittenhouse was found not guilty of first-degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon. This felony charge is connected to the death of Rosenbaum, the first man Rittenhouse shot.
- Count 2: Rittenhouse was found not guilty of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon. This charge is connected to reporter Richie McGinnis, who was in the line of fire when Rosenbaum was shot.
- Count 3: Rittenhouse was found not guilty of first-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon. Videos show Rittenhouse being kicked by an unknown man and then shooting at him. That is what this charge is related to.
- Count 4: Rittenhouse was found not guilty of first-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon. This felony charge is connected to the death of Huber, the second man Rittenhouse shot.
- Count 5: Rittenhouse was found not guilty of attempted first-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon. This charge is connected to the shooting of Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz is the third man Rittenhouse shot.
The Rittenhouse case has captured national attention because it grapples with issues of policing, race and the right to self-protection.
The two-week trial featured dramatic testimony, as well as extensive footage of the shootings used by both the state and the defense. Rittenhouse took the stand last week, insisting he had fired only to defend himself.
The trial was marked by combative exchanges between Schroeder and lead prosecutor Thomas Binger. And many of the judge’s rulings have appeared to favor the defense.
Kenosha resident Elizabeth Webb, who is Black and works for an organization called My Sister’s House, was outside the courthouse Tuesday. She said “the ignorance and bias” she’s seen in the courtroom has been “appalling.” Webb said that if her son was in front of the judge trying Rittenhouse, he wouldn’t get the same treatment.
“Black and brown boys would have been shot down in the street, and if they made it to court, they would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, nothing would have been eliminated out of court,” said Webb. “They’re protecting him, they’ve been protecting him, it’s shameful, and it’s sickening”
Wisconsin politicians react to verdict
Politicians took to social media to share their frustration or agreement with the verdicts, falling on party lines. Democrats expressed displeasure over the not guilty verdicts but also called on people to remain peaceful and honor the lives lost. Republicans said the trial was fair and the outcome was the right one.
“No verdict will be able to bring back the lives of Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, or heal Gaige Grosskreutz’s injuries, just as no verdict can heal the wounds or trauma experienced by Jacob Blake and his family,” Democratic Gov. Tony Evers said in a statement. “No ruling today changes our reality in Wisconsin that we have work to do toward equity, accountability, and justice that communities across our state are demanding and deserve.”
He pledged to continue fighting gun violence and disparities facing Wisconsinites and echoed the sentiment that Kenoshans are resilient.
U.S. Senate candidate and Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes said the ruling was an example of the “difficult road to justice in America.”
“Over the last few weeks, many dreaded the outcome we just witnessed,” he tweeted. “The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is what we should expect from our judicial system, but that standard is not always applied equally.”
U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore, D-Milwaukee, agreed, tweeting the jury’s decision represents a “broken” criminal justice system.
Meanwhile, Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, tweeted justice was served.
“I believe justice has been served in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. I hope everyone can accept the verdict, remain peaceful, and let the community of Kenosha heal and rebuild,” Johnson wrote.
Gubernatorial candidate and former Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch wrote on Twitter that the justice system worked how it should.
“The prosecution in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was a complete disgrace,” she wrote, “praising the mob who burned our streets as ‘heroes.'”
Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges tied to fatal Kenosha shootings last year was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
More about the Kenosha Shooting
- Back in the News: The Return of Kyle Rittenhouse - Bruce Murphy - Feb 28th, 2022
- Op Ed: Rittenhouse Verdict Gives New Defense For Killing - Ion Meyn - Dec 20th, 2021
- Rittenhouse No Longer Enrolled at College - Henry Redman - Dec 1st, 2021
- Data Wonk: Rittenhouse Feared His Rifle Endangered Him - Bruce Thompson - Nov 24th, 2021
- Rittenhouse Says ‘Self-Defense Was On Trial’ - Shawn Johnson - Nov 23rd, 2021
- Murphy’s Law: After Rittenhouse, Expect More Vigilantes - Bruce Murphy - Nov 22nd, 2021
- Rep. Robyn Vining: Statement on Rittenhouse Verdict - State Rep. Robyn Vining - Nov 19th, 2021
- Attorney General Kaul Statement on the Verdict in Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse - Wisconsin Department of Justice - Nov 19th, 2021
- Supervisor Taylor Statement on the Rittenhouse Verdict - Sup. Sequanna Taylor - Nov 19th, 2021
- Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Counts - WPR Staff - Nov 19th, 2021
Read more about Kenosha Shooting here
Well, I guess this means that it’s now legal to walk around the streets of America with an assault rifle and shoot everybody that makes you feel uncomfortable…
America is traveling down the last 10 feet of sewer pipe before it plops into the septic tank…
The jury rewrote the rules of self-defense. Now it’s permitted to shoot people in the back (fatal shot delivered into Rosenbaum’s back) and still call it self-defense. Kyle started it all by pointing his gun at a couple. It used to be once you pointed your gun at somebody, you couldn’t claim self-defense. Vigilantes can now rule the street.
Wrong. It’s legal for conservatives to kill who they wish when they wish. Everyone else is game now that white libs are now in season.