Milwaukee Will Comply With Subpoenas, But City Attorney Won’t Say How
Spencer big on promises, but short on details.
“It is extremely important that we let you know what is going on and keep you informed,” said City Attorney Tearman Spencer at a press conference his office called Thursday.
The City of Milwaukee, along with four other cities in the state, received a series of subpoenas from former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman related to the 2020 presidential election. Mayor Tom Barrett, Milwaukee Election Commission executive director Claire Woodall-Vogg, City Clerk Jim Owczarski and the city as an entity have all been subpoenaed under a $676,000 investigation authorized by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester).
So what is the city doing? Spencer said he was trying to save the city money, but wouldn’t say how when asked. He also acknowledged his office, which has seen a number of high-profile resignations and turmoil, is considering requesting funding to hire outside counsel.
“I can’t get into specifics of anything we decided we are going to do that would constitute strategy,” said Spencer.
So not that much transparency.
Spencer did say his office is in communication with the other cities (Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison and Racine) and Gableman.
But when faced with yes or no questions, Spencer rejected the premise. “Is the mayor going to testify on Oct. 22. Yes or no?” asked Fox 6’s Jason Calvi about the appearance date on Barrett’s subpoeana. “That’s not a yes or no question,” responded Spencer.
Questions eventually turned to issues with personnel at Spencer’s office, including a resignation letter last week from assistant city attorney Christian Thomas that accused Spencer of politically motivated, retaliatory conduct aimed at another employee who had accused him of harassment.
Spencer said he would address that in closed session, something reporters, nor the public would be privy to. “I will assure you what you heard isn’t necessarily the truth,” said Spencer before walking away.
The City Attorney is an independently elected position that serves as the city’s legal counsel.
Issues with Subpoenas
Problems with the subpoenas issued by Gableman abound.
The subpoena sent to Woodall-Vogg actually requested election documents from Green Bay, similar to the copy-and-paste errors that plagued the Trump election lawsuits.
Complying with Gableman’s subpoenas as written is expected to involve the production of hundreds of thousands of documents. Barrett, in a statement Wednesday, said the 10-page request was “broadly worded.”
Gableman, in an interview with the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Tuesday, admitted a lack of understanding with regard to how elections work. “Most people, myself included, do not have a comprehensive understanding or even any understanding of how elections work,” said the former conservative justice.
Gableman might also need to brush up on his Latin. The opening line of his subpoenas reads “subpoena deuces tecum” but the correct term is not deuces, but duces. The phrase is Latin for “you shall bring with you.”
The subpoenas compel the clerks to testify on Oct. 15 in a closed hearing at office space Gableman rented in Brookfield; the mayors on Oct. 22.
- Vos Withdraws Subpoenas, Ends Gableman Probe - Henry Redman - Aug 30th, 2022
- Judge Blasts Gableman Probe, Deleted Records - Henry Redman - Aug 17th, 2022
- Vos Fires Gableman, Ends Election Probe - Shawn Johnson - Aug 14th, 2022
- Judge Orders Gableman To Pay $163,000 In Legal Fees - Rich Kremer - Aug 2nd, 2022
- Prosecute 2020 Fake Electors, Advocates Demand - Erik Gunn - Aug 1st, 2022
- Trump Calls For Nullification of Wisconsin’s 2020 Election - Henry Redman - Jul 12th, 2022
- Legal Fight Over Gableman Probe Keeps Growing - Shawn Johnson - Jun 30th, 2022
- Back In the News: Fake Elector Scheme Dogs Ron Johnson - Bruce Murphy - Jun 28th, 2022
- Judge Lifts Contempt Order for Speaker Vos - Rich Kremer - Jun 24th, 2022
- Gableman’s Office Held in Contempt of Court - Madeline Fox - Jun 10th, 2022
Read more about 2020 General Election here
- City Hall: Former City Attorneys File Discrimination Claims - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2022
- City Hall: City Faces $9.5 Million In Legal Claims - Jeramey Jannene - May 4th, 2022
- City Hall: DNS Could Drop City Attorney, Hire Its Own - Jeramey Jannene - Apr 12th, 2022
- City Hall: City Attorney Halts Plan To Sue Reckless Drivers - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 22nd, 2022
- City Hall: Spencer Faces Sex Discrimination Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 22nd, 2022
- City Hall: More Turnover In City Attorney’s Office - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 9th, 2022
- City Hall: Putin-Backing Assistant City Attorney Fired - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 28th, 2022
- City Hall: Council Could End Fight Over Couture Provision - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 22nd, 2022
- City Hall: Tearman Spencer Attacks Robert Bauman - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 21st, 2022
- City Hall: Spencer Alleges Multiple City Hall Politicians Face Criminal Probes - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 21st, 2022
Read more about Turmoil at the City Attorney's Office here