Body Cameras Would Have Helped Jacob Blake Shooting Investigation
District Attorney Michael Graveley said Kenosha Police need body cameras.
In his report on the shooting, Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley detailed the need for the cameras, stating the review of the case relied heavily on cell phone videos. On Tuesday, Graveley announced he wouldn’t charge any of the Kenosha officers involved in the August 2020 shooting of Blake because there wasn’t sufficient evidence to get a conviction.
“Though this cell phone video is extremely important evidence, it did not capture the entirety of the interaction between the involved officers and Jacob Blake,” Graveley’s report said.
In November, months after the Blake shooting, the Kenosha City Council re-approved purchasing 175 body-worn cameras and up to 60 in-car cameras for police vehicles. The council had approved the purchase three years ago, but put it off, because of cost.
Body cameras will be included in Kenosha’s 2022 budget. Mayor John Antaramian declined to comment.
Kenosha is the third largest police department in the state. Graveley said, the community should demand all law enforcement officials wear body cameras.
“I believe and certainly think it is absolutely appropriate for the community to insist (on) body cameras in a position where an incident like this will not happen again without it being fully recorded and everyone being held fully accountable,” he said.
Local government across Wisconsin pledged to review their use of force policies and some have invested in body cameras since George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis, sparking Black Lives Matter protests across the world throughout the summer.
The City of Green Bay will begin providing body and dashboard cameras, tasers, software and training for the Green Bay Police Department this year.
But larger cities, like Madison, still don’t have body cameras.
James Palmer, the executive director of the Wisconsin Professional Police Association, said the Madison police union and prior administration has supported it, but some community groups don’t like the idea. Palmer said he supports cameras, because they protect law enforcement and the public by providing more information.
But cost, storage, and until recently navigating open records laws, have been a major issue.
“Not only the cost of the equipment themselves, but the technology needed to store all the evidence,” Palmer said. “Initially there was a reluctance to implement because there wasn’t any law on the books to provide any guidance on how long the data should be retained.”
All camera data must be kept for at least 120 days. If video data records an encounter that results in death or physical injury, a custodial arrest, a search during an authorized temporary questioning, or a law enforcement officer’s use of force, it must then be retained until the investigation, case, or complaint is completed.
In Kenosha, Graveley said the significance of not having body cameras was immense.
“Were it not for the two people who captured cell phone video of this officer involved shooting, there would have been literally no relevant video or audio recordings of this event,” Graveley’s report said. “In 2020, we should not have to rely on the happenstance of citizens recording on their cell phones in order to have some video/audio record of an incident of this significance.”
Listen to the WPR report here.
Kenosha DA: The Significance Of Not Having Body Cameras Was Immense was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.
- Community Leaders Lament Jacob Blake Decision - PrincessSafiya Byers - Jan 9th, 2021
- Rep. Robyn Vining Responds to Kenosha DA Decision - State Rep. Robyn Vining - Jan 7th, 2021
- Body Cameras Would Have Helped Jacob Blake Shooting Investigation - Corri Hess - Jan 7th, 2021
- Joint Statement on Charging Decision in Jacob Blake Case - Milwaukee Common Council - Jan 6th, 2021
- Barnes Rips Kenosha DA On Blake Shooting - Melanie Conklin - Jan 6th, 2021
- Rep. Stubbs’ Statement on Decision to not Charge Officer Sheskey in Shooting of Jacob Blake - State Rep. Shelia Stubbs - Jan 6th, 2021
- Statement from the Milwaukee Bucks Organization - Milwaukee Bucks - Jan 5th, 2021
- Senator Agard Releases Statement on the Decision to Not Charge Officer Involved in Shooting Jacob Blake - State Sen. Melissa Agard - Jan 5th, 2021
- Rep Hintz: Statement on Jacob Blake Shooting Charging Decision by Kenosha District Attorney - State Rep. Gordon Hintz - Jan 5th, 2021
- Statement from Kenosha County Judicial Candidate Angela Cunningham on Charging Decision of the Jacob Blake Shooting - Angela Cunningham - Jan 5th, 2021
Read more about Shooting of Jacob Blake here