Jeramey Jannene
City Hall

About That Proposed Street Lighting Fee

Average homeowner fee is $45 per year so city could replace 100-year-old circuitry

By - Oct 13th, 2020 12:12 pm
Street light at the corner of N. Marshall St. and E. Ogden Ave. Photo by Mariiana Tzotcheva.

Street light at the corner of N. Marshall St. and E. Ogden Ave. Photo by Mariiana Tzotcheva.

One of the most notable impacts for residents of Milwaukee’s proposed $1.6 billion 2021 budget is a new street lighting fee.

The city’s budget office estimates the average homeowner would pay $45 annually. Property owners would see the fee on their quarterly water bills.

The fee will raise approximately $10.5 million by levying a charge against privately-owned properties. The proposed structure is similar to how the city levies the snow & ice removal fee: a per-foot rate would be set and multiplied by the amount of street frontage a property has.

Properties on blocks without street lights would be exempt and properties on corners would be assessed only for their shorter frontage side.

But why the fee?

The big picture, according to the budget office and Department of Public Works (DPW), is that the move would allow the city to recruit and retain electricians and speed up the replacement of lighting infrastructure that is more than 100 years old.

“It provides a dedicated funding source for street lighting services,” said city fiscal planning specialist Bill Christianson during a budget meeting Friday. “A dedicated street lighting fee protects this critical service from budget pressures each year.”

Last year Mayor Tom Barrett proposed to shorten the period street lights were on each day by 10 minutes, a move that was estimated to save $210,000. The council rejected the change. So this time Barrett is proposing the fee.

The fee would remove the $9.3 million the city spends each year on street lighting from the state-capped property tax levy. This would allow the city to avoid cutting the same amount in spending elsewhere.

The additional $1.2 million would go towards a raise for all electricians. Only 66 percent of its positions are currently full and 17 of the 55 electricians will reach retirement-eligibility come August.

“This is really going to help us stabilize our workforce,” said DPW Commissioner Jeff Polenske.

Rollin Bertran, DPW transportation operations engineer-in-charge, said the city is losing electricians to the private sector. He said they report receiving a $9 per hour raise, a rate the city can’t match.

City Engineer Samir Amin said the city used to receive over 50 applicants for licensed-electrician job openings, but now only gets a couple and some aren’t even qualified. An apprenticeship program within the department helps train from within, but the program takes four years to complete and the city still loses electricians once they’re licensed.

DPW attributes the staffing issue as the driver of its declining repair performance. Since 2018 the city has been unable to repair all street light outages within 24 hours. In 2018 it hit 91% within 24 hours, then 82% in 2019 and 70% in 2020. It had achieved a 98 percent rate in the years prior.

“There is obviously a safety concern when those lights are out,” said Polenske.

If the funding and workforce are stabilized Polenske estimates all street lights in the city can be converted to LED lights within six years. Conversion is already underway, with new lights yielding a 70 percent energy cost savings.

As the city adds LED lights it would see its $3.5 million street lighting electrical bill reduced.

Those savings would be deployed into a project to replace pre-1930s series circuitry (similar to old Christmas tree string lights where a single bad light takes down a whole strand) that powers 40% of the city’s lights with more reliable multiple circuitry. The upgrades, currently on a 30-year pace, would be cut to 11 to 14 years. Changes include not only replacing circuits, but wiring that is buried underground without insulation. An improvement in street light reliability is expected.

“Right now we are somewhat chasing our tails a bit with repairs,” said Polenske. He said there are only a few cities with series circuitry left. Bertran said the city replaces the old circuits during all major road projects, but the work takes time.

“So there are both more outages and fewer people to cover the outages?” asked Alderman Nik Kovac. Yes, said the DPW representatives.

Ald. Scott Spiker asked if the city could fund only a portion of the fee. “If we don’t have the electricians we can’t perform the work, so really they go hand in hand,” said Amin of the need to fund the raises.

“The bigger problem is that $10.5 million would push us over the levy limit,” said budget director Dennis Yaccarino of having to absorb the street lighting cost back into the general fund. State law caps the growth of the city’s property tax levy to the value of new construction.

Ald. Michael Murphy asked for a report on the cost of continuing to repair the existing series circuitry. He said he would like to see if it would be more effective to replace the circuitry faster. But Amin and Bertran said it was difficult to find private contractors that would even do the work.

Murphy, chair of the Reckless Driving Task Force, also asked for information on what the city spends on downed light poles every year. An informal estimate from DPW pegs the cost at $600,000 to $1 million annually.

The alderman, who chairs the city’s Finance & Personnel Committee charged with reviewing the budget, said he wanted to see more details before approving the fee. “I understand why you’re doing it, you’re pushing it off the levy to a fee otherwise you need to make a $10 million cut,” said Murphy. But he said DPW needs to communicate the fee to residents. “I am guessing when people get their first quarterly water bill next year they’re going to be going ‘what the heck is this?'”

There is at least one benefit to residents of the city via a fee instead of a property tax increase. Using a fee means property-tax exempt property owners will need to pay as well. That will account for eight percent of the total revenue according to a budget office estimate. Approximately 33% of that exempt-property revenue will come from religious institutions.

The city’s budget is currently strained not only because of the pandemic, but a steady decline in state shared revenue and a looming need to increase its annual pension fund contribution by over $60 million starting in 2023. The city is prevented by state law from levying its own sales or income tax.

The fee does not cover costs related to traffic lights.

The council is scheduled to adopt the final budget in early November.

More about the 2021 Milwaukee Budget

Read more about 2021 Milwaukee Budget here

One thought on “City Hall: About That Proposed Street Lighting Fee”

  1. kmurphy724 says:

    No one likes extra fees, but stuff (and staff) cost money. Looking forward to the State returning to Milwaukee a bigger share of the money we send them.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us