Acevedo Family Demands Justice
Attorneys call for more to be charged in Joel Acevedo's killing. His parents doubt justice will be done.
Milwaukee Police Officer Michael Mattioli made his initial appearance in court Wednesday, charged with 1st Degree Reckless Homicide, for the murder of Joel Acevedo.
In April, Mattioli held a party at his house which Acevedo attended. At the party Mattioli put Acevedo in a chokehold that ultimately killed him. Acevedo’s family and attorneys have reviewed the recorded 911 calls and body camera footage of police officers that responded to the house, and they say that Acevedo was strangled by Mattioli for 10 minutes straight.
While Acevedo was being choked he yelled out that he wanted to go home. This unfortunate cry has become famous in Milwaukee and is often chanted by local protesters marching against police brutality.
The Acevedo family is represented by attorney B’Ivory LaMarr. And recently, national civil rights attorney Ben Crump has joined LaMarr to provide counsel to the family during Mattioli’s trial. Crump represents George Floyd’s family, and previously represented the families of Trayvon Martin and Tamir Rice.
Based upon circuit court records, Mattioli was allowed to remain out of custody during his trial on the $50,000 bond that he initially posted after his arrest. The prosecuting attorney is Assistant District Attorney Paul Tiffin. Mattioli is represented by attorneys Michael F. Hart and Craig Powell.
LaMarr and Crump both called for charges to be brought against the individuals that held Joel down while Mattioli choked him. LaMarr charged that District Attorney John Chisholm‘s office was dispensing “coupon justice.” That is, “charge one and get two free.”
LaMarr said the DA’s office has no problem finding probable cause to charge the hundreds of people sitting in the Milwaukee County Jail, yet somehow seems to be struggling with it in the Acevedo murder case. “What we expect… that when you have evidence that meets probable cause you take that evidence, provide what is called due process and then present that evidence to a reasonable jury.”
Crump blasted Wednesday’s bond hearing for Mattioli, saying “This was a bond hearing for a man who literally strangled [Acevedo’s mother’s] baby boy to death. And yet there was no request to increase the bail amount even though this bail amount was set when he was still alive.” (Joel Acevedo lingered for days, not dying until after the bail was set.) Crump said he was hoping court officials would “acknowledge the sanctity of life.”
The Acevedo’s and their attorneys have seen body camera footage from responding officers, and listened to the 911 call recording, and say the evidence shows Mattioli had his arm around Acevedo’s neck for 10 minutes.
According to Crump, the body camera footage shows Mattioli still had his arm around Acevedo’s neck when the first officer got to the scene, who asks whether he’s still breathing, to which Mattioli responds, with his arm around Acevedo’s neck, ‘I don’t know.’ He said the responding officer treats Mattioli like a fellow officer, “not like he’s a man who’s strangling another human being to death.”
Acevedo’s mother, Maribel, said that after watching Mattioli’s initial appearance, she doesn’t believe anyone will defend her family, or her son’s life. Her husband Jose struck a similar tone, saying, “No one spoke up for us in that courtroom today. My son is not gonna get a fair trial, I already know it.”
Maribel said she was disgusted to sit in the courtroom and “to look at a man, that held my son for 10 minutes, and took his life, behind closed doors, and have this false self-defense narrative.”
As she spoke, many in the crowd were moved to tears. “I know my son,” Maribel said, “he wanted to go home.”
“You took my son,” she said.
Press Conference
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the Case of Officer Michael Mattioli
- Statement on verdict in Joel Acevedo homicide trial - Milwaukee Common Council - Nov 14th, 2023
- Judge Rules Acevedo Video Can Be Released - Corrinne Hess - May 5th, 2021
- Body Cameras Key To Charges Against Police - Corrinne Hess - May 4th, 2021
- Acevedo Family Pledges Push For Justice - Isiah Holmes - Dec 29th, 2020
- Officer Accused Of Reckless Homicide Resigns - Corrinne Hess - Sep 9th, 2020
- Mayor Tom Barrett released the following statement: - Mayor Tom Barrett - Sep 8th, 2020
- Joel Acevedo deserves justice - Ald. JoCasta Zamarripa - Sep 3rd, 2020
- Milwaukee Police Department Decides to Move Forward with the Internal Investigation of the Off-Duty Incident Involving Officer Michael Mattioli - Milwaukee Police Department - Sep 2nd, 2020
- Can Police Be Defunded? - Allison Dikanovic - Jul 26th, 2020
- Independent Business Association of Wisconsin Stands With Milwaukee Police Chief Morales - Independent Business Association of Wisconsin - Jul 20th, 2020
Read more about Case of Officer Michael Mattioli here
There is no way an officer on suspension for any reason should be paid. My employer never paid people who were suspended. if they were cleared after investigations they received pay for the suspension dates, otherwise nope.