Op Ed

America’s Police State

20% of police served in the military, and tend to get more complaints of excessive force.

By - Jun 8th, 2020 03:21 pm
N. 6th and W. Juneau Ave on June 2nd, 2020. Photo by Maddy Day.

N. 6th and W. Juneau Ave on June 2nd, 2020. Photo by Maddy Day.

George Floyd’s death at the hands – and under the knee – of Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin has triggered a wave of peaceful protests and violent rioting in most major cities across the United States. Caught on video for the world to see, the incident has driven home the perception that African-Americans are excluded from America’s grand narrative of progress, in which conditions supposedly improve over time.

The data bear out that perception. According to a recent Brookings Institution study, as of 2016, “the net worth of a typical white family is nearly ten times greater than that of a Black family.” And though the US accounts for just 5% of the global population, it is home to 21% of the world’s incarcerated people, one-third of whom are African-American.

Scarcely a week goes by without a new story about African-Americans dying at the hands of police or vigilantes. Each episode is met with media handwringing and calls for reforms of police procedures. But the problem is never resolved, in part because it is actually many problems.

For starters, many Americans have accepted that they live in a winner-takes-all society of deepening inequality. While the wealth and incomes of those at the very top continue to grow, tens of millions of Americans struggle to afford health care, childcare, and other basic goods. This story has been told many times over. But what often goes unremarked is that the responsibility for managing the social costs of this system has been offloaded onto the police.

Generally speaking, most police in urban areas are white and have little or no experience interacting with the populations within their jurisdictions. The familiarity gap is compounded by the fact that one in five police officers is a military veteran who previously conducted violent pacification efforts in Afghanistan or Iraq. These former soldiers have been primed to see the urban populations they police as threats to their own safety, at best.

That, too, is borne out by the data. For example, in Boston between 2010 and 2015, there were 28 complaints of excessive use of force for every 100 police officers with some military service, compared to 17 complaints for every 100 non-veteran officers. And Boston is hardly alone. America is obliged to place veterans in meaningful work. But, clearly, only individuals with a demonstrated record of effectiveness in de-escalating tense situations should be permitted to serve as police in urban communities.

Chauvin is not a veteran of the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq, but he did serve as a military police officer with the US Army between September 1996 and February 1997, and again between September 1999 and May 2000. With 18 prior complaints filed against him, he embodies much of what is wrong with America’s policing system. After all, America also has obligations to its urban poor. African-Americans in Detroit, Milwaukee, St. Louis, and many other de-industrialized urban areas live in conditions that are closer to those in South Africa and Brazil than to other rich countries.

In poor and economically insecure African-American communities, a multigenerational vicious cycle ensues. Children are born into an environment where interactions with police have long been confrontational rather than cooperative. And the police, in turn, conflate suspicion and hostility with criminality. All too often, police assume that black males are suspects, and treat them accordingly. In response, many African-American men are primed to assume a suspicious and hostile attitude toward the police.

The structures underpinning America’s racial disparities are the products of both negligence and design. Fixing them will require a multi-pronged strategy.

The first step is to heed Martin Luther King, Jr., and establish  as a core principle of economic policy. US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has indicated that the Fed faces no effective limit on its ability to fund public investments. In that case, it should take up spending proposals such as those in the Green New Deal and employ disadvantaged workers at good wages to drive advances in clean-energy and other key sectors of the future economy. Those without work records could be directed to public beautification projects at entry-level wages, which would enable them to start developing basic skills.

The COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated that much of what was previously considered unimportant work is, in fact, essential. From health-care facilities and food services to transport and sanitation, African-Americans disproportionately hold jobs that we consider least and, ultimately, depend on most.

Yet, taking the federal minimum wage as a baseline, America’s essential workers are the lowest paid among high-income countries. Although US GDP has increased by several multiples over the past 70 years, the federal minimum wage is a mere $0.75 higher than it was in 1950, after adjusting for inflation. The message to America’s essential workers has long been, “You don’t matter.” Clearly, that must change.

Finally, Americans are grotesquely over-armed, and this problem has grown worse since the Tea Party takeover of many state governments during President Barack Obama’s administration. In a country with almost 400 million civilian-owned firearms, regulations on gun sales in many states have nonetheless been loosened. As a result, a city like Chicago, despite having a reasonable level of gun control, is awash in firearms, because one need only drive an hour north to buy from Wisconsin’s under-regulated markets.

For obvious reasons, America’s gun problem contributes to its violent crime problem. It also places significantly more stress on the police. Progressives and police organizations should recognize that they have common ground on the issue of gun control.

There are clear measures that could be taken to reduce the pressures on both our urban communities and those tasked with policing them. It is well within our power to strengthen the economic and social health of our cities while reforming police methods to encourage conflict de-escalation and resolution. There is no longer any excuse for inaction.

Jeffrey Sommers is a Professor of Political Economy & Public Policy at UW-Milwaukee. This column was first published by Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org

Categories: Op-Ed, Public Safety

2 thoughts on “Op Ed: America’s Police State”

  1. TransitRider says:

    The article says “…Chicago, despite having a reasonable level of gun control, is awash in firearms, because one need only drive an hour north to buy from Wisconsin’s under-regulated markets.”

    Actually, Indiana is much closer and, I think, a bigger problem for Chicago. Chicago’s most dangerous neighborhoods (the south side) are just a few minutes drive from the Indiana state line.

    Compare Chicago to New York City. Whereas Chicago is adjacent to Indiana and within an hour of Wisconsin, NYC is adjacent to New Jersey and within an hour of Connecticut. But NYC has nowhere near Chicago’s gun problem because CT & NJ also have strict gun laws.

  2. Barbara Richards says:

    The economic, jobs link, to the solution found in the proposals for a green New Deal needs to be part of the demands going forward. This means getting “shovel ready” employment by profit and non profit local initiatives ready for the funding that we then must demand from our elected officials at all levels but particularly the Federal level. The lie that there is no money has been exposed by COVID-19…it is now 20 and we see with 2020 vision. The Joint City County Task Force on Climate and Economic Equity has the backing of city and county officials to find these local solutions. The Preliminary Report states:
    “This report brings forth the need to evaluate, mitigate and adapt to ecosystem changes brought about by a changing climate and to address long standing racial and economic disparities. The impending environmental impacts to all of Milwaukee’s systems will be considerable if the community continues to depend on current practices that rely on external resources rather than local solutions. We can develop local employment if we build for a new local economy. We can create a resilient Milwaukee based on reimagined economic and social structures. The current system’s lack of capacity to meet these twin challenges (climate and equity) requires leadership for a secure and just Milwaukee by 2050.

    Therefore, this Task Force requests the community, from utilities to CEOs to NGOs; to City and County and State-wide elected officials; to neighborhood associations, BIDs to NIDs; to churches, small businesses, schools at all levels; to you and your neighbors; a commitment to meet and listen to one another’s ideas with open minds and hearts. What does a Milwaukee look like that is just and resilient? This is a community call to action for climate and economic equity.

    The Task Force wants to inform and listen to as many Milwaukeeans as possible. You can reference the work of the Task Force in the attachments to Common Council File Number 191039. The Task Force plans to reach out to the public, and asks that readers of this document reach out to it, as well. You are asked to join the conversation for a community-wide response to the twin challenges of climate and equity. The Task Force will also proceed with short-term strategies as it is able. Then, together with the community, the Task Force will publish a plan after a one to 2-year engagement of community representatives and experts from all the above groups to dig deeper into the path to the future. Answer the Call for Action!”

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us