Congress Should Approve Two More States
It's time to make Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico states.
Well, this column will sure date me. When I was in elementary school in 1959, we learned two new songs. The opening words of the first were “Your statehood we celebrate, Alaska our 49th state.” The second song substituted “Hawaii” and “50th.” The legislation approving their statehood gave more than a million Americans their full rights of citizenship. It was also a boon for the flag manufacturers, as new flags with 50 stars were suddenly in demand.
Sixty-two years later, it’s way past time to give the flag makers another boost and put two more stars on the flag. Now is the opportunity, with Democratic control of Congress and the presidency, to make Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico our 51st and 52nd states, and give full representation to 4 million of our fellow Americans who have been denied their voting rights.
Without being states, Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico have no representation in the U.S. Senate. They have one delegate each in the House, but that delegate can’t vote.
Lack of representation is not the only reason to finally grant statehood to these two territories, which are sometimes referred to as “America’s colonies.” The lack of statehood and inability to fully govern their own affairs has led to some serious consequences.
If Washington, D.C. were a state, the attack by Trump-supporting terrorists on our nation’s Capitol might have been blunted. That’s because the D.C. National Guard could not be fully deployed to meet the threat posed by the Trump insurrectionists since the D.C. Guard is under control of the president, not the elected leader of Washington, D.C. The Trump administration limited the Guard mobilization to a small number of troops. If the Guard had been fully deployed, the Trump terrorists could have been thwarted.
In 2017, Puerto Rico suffered widespread devastation from Hurricane Maria. Lacking the resources of a state to recover from the storm damage, the island has been subjected to a severe and long-lasting economic and humanitarian crisis.
Legislation for statehood has been introduced in Congress many times but has never succeeded. Last summer, the House of Representatives voted to make Washington, D.C. a state but the effort was killed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Republicans want to continue the potential for minority rule in the Senate since each state, regardless of population, has two senators. A thinly populated state like Wyoming has two senators, both Republicans, while California, with a population 70 times greater, also has just two senators. Republicans have historically manipulated statehood to boost their numbers in the Senate. You might wonder why the thinly populated Dakotas have four senators. The Dakota Territory was divided into two states specifically to boost the number of Republicans in the Senate.
It’s time for today’s schoolkids to learn two new songs. I’d suggest “Washington, D.C., our 51st state” and “Puerto Rico, our 52nd state.”
This column was first published by The Cap Times in Madison.
Spencer Black represented the 77th Assembly District for 26 years and was chair of the Natural Resources Committee.
Op-Ed
-
Unlocking Milwaukee’s Potential Through Smart Zoning Reform
Jul 5th, 2024 by Ariam Kesete -
We Energies’ Natural Gas Plans Are A Mistake
Jun 28th, 2024 by John Imes -
Milwaukee Needs New Kind of School Board
Jun 26th, 2024 by Jordan Morales
Absolutely!
How many Senate votes are required? Could be a serious roadblock.
simple majority to add a state, but in the Senate the bill would be subject to a filibuster so in reality you need 60 votes.
Republicans don’t like more people voting.
There was a reason Washington D.C was not made a state and I don’t remember what I read about that. As for Puerto Rico I say we should.
One problem with DC statehood is what to do about the 23rd Amendment (which gives DC 3 electoral votes and explicitly empowers Congress to determine how those 3 electors are chosen).
What’s to keep somebody from arguing that these 3 votes are IN ADDITION to what it gets as a state and/or to argue that Congress gets to pick these 3 electors itself?
DC statehood (a good thing in my mind) gets messy unless the 23rd Amendment is repealed.
I’m agnostic on this issue, but sort of curious as to what this topic has to do with Urban Milwaukee, or even Wisconsin for that matter.