Lawsuit Dropped Over East Side Apartments
Neighbors sued to stop project, only to drop the suit while still raising objections.
A proposal to develop a new four-story, 55-unit apartment building on N. Hackett Ave. got a boost Monday. The neighbors suing over the project voluntarily withdrew their lawsuit.
“We are withdrawing the lawsuit, for now,” says the opposition group’s website. “Realizing that the lawsuit we had filed August 18th is complicating communication with the city, developers, and others, we are filing a motion with the court today to withdraw it. At least we were able to get some of our points across. Is such a big jump in zoning really necessary? Why?”
The multi-faceted project, from St. Mark’s Episcopal Church and developer Michael DeMichele, would replace a failing 1940s addition to the 111-year-old church at 2604-2644 N. Hackett Ave., and would be financed in part by selling vacant land and a small parking lot to DeMichele so he can develop a market-rate apartment building. Parking would be accommodated underneath the apartment building and in a nearby, underutilized structure on N. Downer Ave.
Opponents of the project, many of whom live in three-story condominium buildings across the street, have raised concerns about perceived parking and traffic impacts, the building’s size, that future residents would be renters, not owners and affordability issues at the two public hearings on the project.
The opponent’s website says “we’re for development, just not this development.” It says the church should have better engaged with neighbors and developed a shorter proposal focused on homeownership, rather than renting. “We realize that we are lucky to live in a neighborhood that has enough disposable income and time to organize and file a lawsuit so we can have a voice and not be ignored. This doesn’t make us NIMBYs — NOBODY SHOULD HAVE TO SUE THE CITY TO HAVE GOOD-FAITH INPUT INTO HOW THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPS,” says the Aug. 29 statement.
“It seems as if the rule of law has been abandoned,” said Larraine McNamara-McGraw, one of the leading opponents of the project, an attorney and a complainant in the lawsuit, at last week’s plan commission hearing. “This has been rule by fiat.”
She accused city staff of withholding information and violating the due process rights of project opponents. In filings submitted before the hearing and a prior one she’s asked to be treated as the area alderwoman, despite last serving in 1996, and incorrectly identified the addresses of multiple project supporters in an attempt to call them the “true NIMBYs” of housing development and delegitimize their support.
City planning manager Sam Leichtling said that he had received 23 emails from McNamara-McGraw between July 5 and July 19. “I have sent her 17 different responses personally. All of them very timely, all of them from me personally.”
The development team is requesting to change the site’s zoning designation from RM-3 to RM-6, which would boost the allowed unit density to enable the project. At the planning hearing, Leichtling said that the apartment building, which would provide 69 underground parking spaces, complied with the parking requirements of the lower density RM-3 designation, which requires more parking, and the height limit of the lower density district.
The new apartment building would have an H-shape and be clad entirely in brick, ideas that DeMichele said were expanded on after receiving early feedback on the project.
“We wish to build a very high-quality, infill building that fits the quality of the neighborhood,” said DeMichele last week.
The developer said he expects to charge a rate of $2.10 per square foot per month (a 1,000-square-foot apartment would cost $2,100 per month) and provide high-quality finishes and in-building amenities. That’s consistent with many new higher-end apartment buildings. Units would be marketed for empty nesters and professionals, not college students, said the developer.
HGA is leading the design of both the parish hall and apartment building. JLA Architects is supporting the housing portion. Catalyst Construction would serve as the general contractor. Three Leaf Partners is also a partner on the development.
Alderman-in-waiting Jonathan Brostoff, the only candidate on the November ballot, is supporting the proposal.
In addition to McNamara-McGraw, other plaintiffs in the lawsuit included Karen Hagen, Neil Thompson, Mark Plotkin and Debbie Bylan. Plotkin is the lone complainant who doesn’t live across the street, instead living in a home behind the proposed building. He raised concerns at the hearing about sightlines into his backyard and home.
Renderings and Site Plan
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
- Friday Photos: The Fitz Rises On The East Side - Jeramey Jannene - Aug 25th, 2023
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Council Unanimously Approves East Side Apartments - Jeramey Jannene - Sep 20th, 2022
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Committee Approves East Side Apartment Project Despite Complaints - Jeramey Jannene - Sep 13th, 2022
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Lawsuit Dropped Over East Side Apartments - Jeramey Jannene - Aug 30th, 2022
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Commission Approves Controversial Church Apartment Plan - Jeramey Jannene - Aug 22nd, 2022
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Historic Commission Okays 55-Unit East Side Apartment Building - Jeramey Jannene - Jul 11th, 2022
- Eyes on Milwaukee: New Apartment Building, Rebuilt Parish Hall For St. Mark’s - Jeramey Jannene - Jun 15th, 2022
Read more about Hackett Development Proposal here