Milwaukee School Board Member Terry Falk
Op Ed

Is Student Mobility Hurting MPS?

Yes, many students transfer between schools, but that may not be the real problem for them.

By - Nov 18th, 2018 11:02 am
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
George Washington Carver Academy. Photo by Dave Reid.

George Washington Carver Academy. Photo by Dave Reid.

Through a series of articles, Erin Richards of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel shed light on students who change schools during the school year, sometimes two or three times, who also have lower academic achievement.

Unfortunately, this is not a new problem. I wrote an article on the very same issue for Milwaukee Magazine in October 1992. I even highlighted the same school Richards does, Carver. At that time, its name was Palmer.

In 1988-89 Palmer/Carver had a student mobility rate of 73 percent. That meant for every four seats in a classroom, three of those seats had students leave the school only to be replaced with other students. The response to that continual mobility was to institute a bus-back program. If students moved any time during the school year, the district was willing to bus students back to their original school. In 1990-91, Palmer/Carver’s mobility rate dramatically dropped to only 26 percent.

But busing was a dirty word, and then Superintendent Howard Fuller was under pressure to cut the cost of busing in the district. He proposed five busing districts all pretty much in the shape of pieces of a pie. If students stayed within the pie shaped district, they would be bussed back to their original school. But if students moved outside of that district, school changes were required. That meant that a student could move quite a distance and still stay in the same transportation district if that movement was near the outer rim of the pie shaped district. But if a student lived in the central city, where all the points of pie shaped districts converged, that student would only have to move a couple a blocks to be in a new transportation district necessitating school transfer in order to get transportation.

MPS did increase monies to transport students from homeless shelters, but it is safe to say that student mobility did rise. Today’s mobility rate at Palmer/Carver is 38 percent. Its lower mobility rate may have more to do with physical housing patterns around the school than anything else.

The question is, does a bus-back program improve academic achievement? How important is it to keep students in the same school for an entire year?

Twenty-six years, ago researchers Sammis B. White and M. Marc Thomas of UW-Milwaukee were trying to answer that question looking at Milwaukee’s bus-back program. When I wrote my article, they were in the middle of their research and didn’t have an answer. I ran into Professor White recently at the Marquette Law School when Erin Richards gave her presentation.

White sent me a copy of their findings which showed almost no change in reading skills for students who were bused back to their home schools over those that changed schools. There was only a modest improvement in math. Was the cost and effort to keep students in their original schools even worth it?

Today White believes that low academic achievement for mobile students was more likely caused by trauma from the home. Mobility is simply a manifestation of the problem.

Yes, students who are more mobile have lower academic achievement. But they are also more mobile because they have less stability in their lives. Their families may be in chaos. Where they live may be unstable. And their school mobility may be another manifestation of their overall instability.

No school system is more in tune with the challenges of student mobility than the schools run by the Department of Defense. DOD schools have built an entire system to support families who must move from one military base to another. But one of their biggest challenges is not the movement itself, but the family instability resulting from military personnel who are deployed to combat areas and often bring home trauma which affects the entire family.

Numerous studies do show a correlation between mobility and academic achievement. It has been harder to show a cause-effect relationship or whether decreasing mobility improves achievement.

Richards did a service to this community by exposing the problems of student mobility and academic achievement. I still believe there is merit in trying to limit student mobility and keeping students in their home schools. But mobility is as much a symptom of the problem as it is a cause of poor achievement. Family trauma, homelessness, poor nutrition, and violence can overwhelm the issues of students moving from one school to the next.

Solving the issue of student mobility is not a silver bullet to improve academic achievement.

Terry Falk serves as a member of the Milwaukee School Board.

Categories: Education, Op-Ed

2 thoughts on “Op Ed: Is Student Mobility Hurting MPS?”

  1. frankwill says:

    I agree that “mobility is as much a symptom of the problem as it is a cause of poor achievement” and that “Family trauma, homelessness, poor nutrition, and violence can overwhelm the issues of students moving from one school to the next.” And these problems themselves are symptoms of deeper root causes of problems that our community continues to fail to solve. (We “address”, “alleviate”, and “manage” but we fail to “solve” our problems.)

    Last week 24/7 Wall St. released its index of the 15 worst US cities for black Americans . The index is based on eight measures that assess race-based gaps in socioeconomic outcomes in each of the nation’s metropolitan areas. Milwaukee is rated the second worst. Racine is #3. Once more, our city continues to set records of the wrong kind: Often when a new study like this is released, Milwaukee is at or close to the bottom of the pack on key indicators.

    Why aren’t we making more progress after so much hard work by so many over so many years? For one thing, we have a local low wage/no wage economy built on the assumption that tens of thousands of Milwaukeeans, many who work full time, can be paid substandard wages that trap them and their children in permanent poverty. We try to alleviate this through programs that reduce the hardship for individuals but widespread poverty persists. That’s because we’ve failed as a community to tackle underlying root causes — those economic, criminal justice, social, educational, and political systems that produce high levels of poverty. Equally important is the racism directed toward black Americans and other communities of color. Racism, deeply embedded in America since our country’s founding, has been a defining feature of Milwaukee. The efforts to address this have aided some individuals but racism at the deeper systems level remains, giving rise to disparities in every sector of community life. We need much more that current efforts.

    Frank Martinelli, Milwaukee

  2. Thomas Sepllman says:

    Would someone analysis the Montessori Schools. They do bus back and for a longer period of time. If a child’s life is in disorder but their school life is stable does that help. I suspect that it does but it has to be for a period of years not months to make the difference. I am glad that others have noted that trauma is a significant factor in lower scores as well. Yes if we stop suspending kids because of their behavior and work to heal the trauma that the kids have suffered or are suffering then real progress will be made. Tom Spellman

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us