Surplus Property Law Results in Just One Vacant Milwaukee School Sale to Charter School
WILL Policy Brief revisits how state law was thwarted by local actors for the last five years
The News: A new Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) policy brief reveals how a state law passed in 2015 intended to make vacant Milwaukee schools available to charter and private schools has been thwarted by local actors. Empty Handed: How Milwaukee Thwarted a State Law Meant to Help Schools reveals that just one vacant Milwaukee school was sold to a Milwaukee charter school in the last five years despite the intent of a state law intended to facilitate sales.
The Quote: Director of Education Policy Libby Sobic said, “This is a story of hard lessons. Good intentions were thwarted by a lack of taxpayer accountability at the local level. And a state law intended to help meet the high demand for school facilities has resulted in just one sale to a charter school. The problems haven’t gone away and it’s time to develop new solutions.”
But by 2020, just one Milwaukee charter school had purchased a vacant school despite interest by local school leaders. What happened? Director of Education Policy Libby Sobic takes a deep dive into the sordid history of vacant schools in Milwaukee in Empty Handed: How Milwaukee Thwarted a State Law Meant to Help Schools. This important policy brief reveals:
- The implementation of the Surplus Property Law was challenged from the start because Milwaukee Public Schools continuously tried to prevent vacant buildings from being made available for sale.
- Several private schools, like WILL client Right Step, tried to purchase these buildings. They were unsuccessful after the Milwaukee Common Council did everything in their power to prevent the sale.
- Five years later, only three vacant school buildings remain available for purchase.
- The need for facility access for private and public charters is more important than ever, as many schools have waitlists and as parents re-evaluate their school choices during the pandemic.
Read More:
- “Empty Handed: How Milwaukee Thwarted a State Law Meant to Help Schools,” October 2020
- “Why are taxpayers spending millions on abandoned MPS buildings?“, CBS 58, July 26, 2019
- “This Building Is for Sale (but Not to a Charter School),” The Wall Street Journal, November 9, 2018
- “What Goes Around Comes Around: How MPS and Milwaukee’s Failure to Sell Vacant Schools Has Contributed to the District’s Budget Deficit,” August 2018
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Local control has always been a bedrock conservative canon. How WILL can claim to be conservative and continue to undermine local control is a good indication that this firm is not about liberty but about creating a State government where power is concentrated and autocratic. If WILL is so concerned about “liberty”, why does it continue to work with the Republican leadership on voter suppression????
Many of the private schools wanted MPS to sell the building to them for nothing, while developers were willing to pay to turn the buildings into housing. I’d say MPS went for the best deal – plus the school building would return to the property tax rolls and start generating tax revenue for the school system. Even if the developer paid nothing, turning the property into a taxpaying parcel is a win for MPS and the city.
WILL doesn’t care about local control, they care about GOP control. Notice how the bill was passed by Darling and Kooyenga, not anyone from Milwaukee? WILL stands for the belief that the GOP knows better than Milwaukee or Madison how to run a city.
For many years, Republicans have attached patriotic, glorified names to pieces of legislation in order to disguise just how distasteful and questionable that they really were (i.e The Patriot Act).
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty has followed that model.
This piece wasn’t written by a lawyer but by a PR agency.
This is a full blown tool of the Republican Party funded by some very deep pockets. The Bradley Foundation and WMC come to mind.