Clean Wisconsin weighs-in on major PFAS bill, calls for changes to language that could weaken spills law
Bill provides funding to help Wisconsin communities address “forever chemicals” but could constrain state’s ability to hold polluters accountable.
Today Clean Wisconsin Water & Agriculture Program Director Sara Walling spoke to members of the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy about Senate Bill 312, which focuses of PFAS contamination. During her testimony, Walling stressed that the bill along with the $125 million recently allocated for PFAS clean-up in the state budget process represent a significant step toward addressing this statewide issue.
“While the actual cost to clean up PFAS pollution, provide safe drinking water and prevent future contamination is difficult to calculate, $125 million is a significant investment that should provide extensive assistance to many affected communities,” said Walling, adding that municipal grant programs created in Senate Bill 312 are also critical.
But Walling stopped short of supporting the bill, pointing to concerns over language in the bill limiting the Department of Natural Resources’ ability to hold polluters accountable.
“…we believe the language risks needlessly weakening Wisconsin’s Spills Law. We won’t make progress on this issue if, for every one step forward in the use of these proposed new grants, communities will move two steps back in adequately identifying contaminated properties, remediating those properties, and, if necessary, holding polluters accountable. We urge the bill authors to consider amendments that ensure PFAS and related compounds are treated the same as other relevant contaminants under the Spills Law. Limiting the department’s statutory authority in the ways suggested by this bill will not help Wisconsin address this problem,” she told the committee.
After today’s hearing, Walling was optimistic that amendments would be made to safeguard the DNR’s ability to respond to PFAS contamination sites.
“Clean Wisconsin has been working with DNR staff and the bill’s authors. There is a willingness to address this and avoid unintended consequences that could actually move Wisconsin backwards when it comes to addressing the PFAS crisis,” she said. “It’s critical that the DNR be able to respond quickly and meaningfully to contamination incidents. So we’ll keep working to make sure the DNR’s authority to do that is protected.”
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
More about the PFAS Problem
- Wisconsin Supreme Court Backs State Regulators of PFAS Pollution - Danielle Kaeding and Rich Kremer - Jun 24th, 2025
- Gov. Evers Releases Statement on Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision in WMC Inc v. DNR - Gov. Tony Evers - Jun 24th, 2025
- Rep. Shelia Stubbs Elected Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Legislative Caucus Vice Chair of the Task Force on Emerging Contaminants - State Rep. Shelia Stubbs - Jun 16th, 2025
- Legislature’s Budget Committee Unanimously Boosts Clean Water Funding By $732 Million - Danielle Kaeding - Jun 6th, 2025
- Trump Administration moves to weaken standards for toxic ‘forever chemicals’ in drinking water - Clean Wisconsin - May 14th, 2025
- Wisconsin Officials Unhappy With EPA Plan To Weaken PFAS Standards - Danielle Kaeding - May 14th, 2025
- Wisconsin Could Lose $55 Million Under Proposed EPA Budget Cuts - Danielle Kaeding - May 7th, 2025
- French Island Makes Progress on PFAS Pollution - Richelle Wilson and Trevor Hook - Mar 24th, 2025
- Who Will Pay for PFAS Pollution? - Bennet Goldstein - Feb 27th, 2025
- Gov. Evers’ biennial state budget prioritizes clean water, clean energy, and public lands for Wisconsin - Wisconsin Conservation Voters - Feb 18th, 2025
Read more about PFAS Problem here
Recent Press Releases by Clean Wisconsin
Trump Administration moves to weaken standards for toxic ‘forever chemicals’ in drinking water
May 14th, 2025 by Clean WisconsinHere’s what it means for Wisconsin: