Jeramey Jannene

Former Mayoral Aide, MPD Official Charged With Voter Fraud

Marcey Patterson charged with voter fraud to get improper pay.

By - Aug 25th, 2025 02:10 pm
Marcey Patterson appears before the Community & Economic Development in March 2025. Image from City of Milwaukee City Channel, City Clerk's Office.

Marcey Patterson appears before the Community & Economic Development in March 2025. Image from City of Milwaukee City Channel, City Clerk’s Office.

Marcey Patterson is alleged to have committed one of the stranger cases of voter fraud in recent Milwaukee history.

It’s cost her a high-paid, executive command staff job with the Milwaukee Police Department. It could also cost her more than $8,200 if the city pursues clawing back improperly paid residency bonuses.

Patterson, according to a newly filed criminal complaint, is alleged to have lived in the suburbs of Glendale and Brown Deer while repeatedly claiming a Milwaukee home where her mother lives as her primary residence.

Since moving out in 2018, Patterson, 45, voted 12 times using a city of Milwaukee address while not living in the city of Milwaukee.

The address issue netted Patterson, the recently resigned Community Relations and Engagement Director for MPD, a Class I felony charge. If convicted, the felony carries a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment of up to three years and six months or both.

Patterson, according to the 2025 city budget, was to be paid $112,498 this year. She resigned from the job on July 21, five days after she was interviewed by the Milwaukee County District Attorney’s Office. The criminal charge was filed Monday.

She had joined the police department in 2022 after spending more than a decade in other city roles, including several with the mayor’s office.

As portrayed by Assistant District Attorney Matthew Westphal‘s criminal complaint, Patterson offered a confusing explanation for where she lives and what constitutes a permanent residence.

“Patterson was shown the April 4, 2022, personal history questionnaire and agreed that she filled it out. When shown where she’d listed the [Milwaukee] residence, Patterson stated that was the residence she considered her permanent residence. However, she stated that she does not sleep at the [Milwaukee] residence at all. She then stated that her mother is 80 years old, so she does have occasional overnight visits.

“When asked where she sleeps, Patterson said the Brown Deer address is her address where she lives, where she sleeps, where she wakes up, where she leaves for work, and where her son is. But she stated [the Milwaukee address] is a permanent address she uses. Complainant asked Patterson whether she was staying at the [Milwaukee] address when she listed the [Glendale] residence. Patterson stated that she would occasionally stay at the [Milwaukee] residence to help her mother, but where she ‘laid her head at night was [at the Glendale address].'”

The complaint says that Patterson offered the fact that the Milwaukee address was printed on her driver’s license as a reason she kept using it. She does co-own the home, according to the complaint and city assessment records.

She gained no clear benefit by voting in one Milwaukee County municipality over another, but declaring a Milwaukee residence for city payroll purposes is an entirely different story.

As of 2019, city employees who live within city limits are paid an extra 3%. The policy was put in place after the state, in 2013, unilaterally stripped the city’s residency requirement.

“Complainant asked Patterson where she was living when she was hired by MPD. Patterson stated the [Glendale] residence. When asked about the 3% incentive, Patterson stated she wasn’t aware of it until the recent reclassification of her position approximately one year and a half previous. She stated that she thought living within 15 miles of the City was sufficient. When asked where she learned about the 15-mile rule, she stated that she overhead people talking about it when the new residence rules were being discussed. Complainant knows that the 3% residency incentive never included a 15 mile rule for non-sworn employees,” says the complaint.

The 15-mile rule applies to a maximum distance sworn public safety personnel must live from the city’s borders. Patterson was a civilian employee.

Citing interviews with MPD chief of staff Heather Hough, Mayor Cavalier Johnson‘s chief of staff and former MPD chief of staff Nick DeSiato, the mayor’s office manager Patty Doll and an email between Patterson and the payroll office, Westphal alleges “the evidence shows that Patterson was aware of the 3% incentive and knew that she did not live in the City of Milwaukee.”

There is no criminal charge related to the 3% incentive payment, but the nature of it is detailed at length in the criminal complaint about voter fraud.

“As a result, during her employment at MPD, Patterson received $8,226.78 in overpayments due to the 3% incentive. MPD would not have authorized these payments but for Patterson’s false assertions regarding her residence,” says the complaint.

In a press release issued Monday, MPD said its own internal affairs investigation substantiated the claims about “criminal misconduct” after becoming aware of the claims in June. Patterson also amended her residency status after being confronted about the issue.

“We hold all members of our department—sworn and civilian—to the highest standards of ethical conduct. We will continue to act decisively to maintain public trust and uphold the values of this organization,” said Chief Jeffrey Norman in a statement.

Patterson, according to her LinkedIn profile, worked in the Mayor’s Office and Department of City Development from 2007 until her transition to MPD.

She started as “Director of First Impressions” under Mayor Tom Barrett and rose through the ranks as scheduling coordinator, special assistant, DCD economic development specialist and, starting in 2016, “Faith Based and Community Engagement Liason.” She left the mayor’s office in December 2021, the same month Johnson became mayor.

A spokesperson for Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Patterson’s first appearance is scheduled for Sept. 15.

UPDATE: The timing of Patterson’s departure from the mayor’s office has been expanded upon.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Categories: Politics, Public Safety

Comments

  1. jmpehoski says:

    What a model citizen. With leaders like her, no wonder there’s so many youth evading fares on MCTS .How did she manage to get as far as she did? Why did it take so long to discover her fraud?

  2. jsalmon1159 says:

    “Director of First Impressions,” is an actual paying position? What the heck is that job?
    Just another example of wasteful government taxpayer funded spending.
    Blue cities are so poorly managed.

  3. mkwagner says:

    I find it interesting that a Black woman living in Milwaukee County and who co-owns a home in Milwaukee where her mother lives, is being vilified. While white, male Republican candidates for governor and senator are not. If what Patterson did is voter fraud, why haven’t those Republican candidates also been charged? I’m not saying that Patterson should not be prosecuted. I am saying that our laws need to be consistently applied regardless of gender, race, political affiliation or the value of their portfolio.

  4. Sam C says:

    I love Milwaukee and I’m glad she was caught. I hope they are auditing all of their employees residency locations now.

    Integrity and honesty in government is very important. It takes time to build public trust and very little time to lose it. I hope the city continues to tighten up things. I’ll give the City the benefit of the doubt and I believe this is an isolated incident and not widespread. I assume if this gets plead out, she’ll be required to return the money.

    We should have similar reporting of public companies. I think the reason we have historic mistrust in government generally is that we expect more and need more from government and they’ve been seen to be failing over and over. This case is the equivalent of stealing from every city taxpayer. I don’t think an employee being charged with a felony for stealing $8,000+ from a company like Northwestern Mutual would even make the news. Employees are caught stealing from companies and charities all the time.

  5. DAGDAG says:

    Once upon a time, The Milwaukee Police Department used to investigate ALL employees before they were hired. From clerks, to Police Aides, to Officers. I guess standards really have changed…based on this prime example. Shame on you Mayor “unacceptable” Johnson and Chief Norman. Looking the other way these days it seems.

  6. jmpehoski says:

    Yes, DAGDAG, standards really have changed. The American people chose to elect a convicted felon to the highest office in our land. We are all paying the price for that decision. Seems to me, everyone without scruples, not just politicians at any level of government, seemed to have adapted the attitude, “if he can do it, so can I.” A very sad commentary on the verge of the 250 anniversary of this country, which, in my opinion, is losing the respect world wise it once had.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us