Op Ed

Anonymous Legislator Undermining State Stewardship Fund

More than a dozen times, initiatives to protect invaluable natural areas were killed.

By - Dec 18th, 2022 04:25 pm
A view of the Pelican River. Photo by LaurentianShield, (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0">CC BY-SA 4.0</a>), via Wikimedia Commons

A view of the Pelican River. Photo by LaurentianShield, (CC BY-SA 4.0), via Wikimedia Commons

Love of our outdoors unites Wisconsinites across all our usual fault lines: urban, suburban and rural, Democrat, Republican and independent. Our forests, waterways, wildlife and scenic beauty are essential to our state’s economy and our quality of life. That’s why it is so surprising and disappointing that Republican legislators are undermining Wisconsin’s award-winning Stewardship Fund.

Wisconsin’s Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Fund has already protected more than 650,000 acres in our state by expanding state parks and forests, preserving unique natural areas and wildlife habitat, as well as providing facilities for the public to enjoy these resources.

More than 30 years ago, as chair of the Assembly Natural Resources Committee, I helped create the Stewardship Fund to protect the best of what’s left of outdoor Wisconsin in the face of development pressure and potentially unwise land use decisions. I believe current and future generations deserve the opportunity to enjoy the beautiful places and recreational opportunities that make Wisconsin special.

Over the past few years, the Republican-controlled state Legislature has not only been stopping key protection efforts by the Stewardship Fund, but doing so in a secretive, underhanded and unaccountable way.

Here’s what’s going on:

The Legislature rewrote the Stewardship law to give themselves review power over major land protection efforts. They have repeatedly abused that law to allow a single legislator to anonymously object and indefinitely kill key stewardship projects. More than a dozen times, key initiatives to protect invaluable natural areas have been stopped. We don’t know who objected to these essential conservation efforts or why they have done so. There has been no public discussion or accountability.

Most recently, an anonymous member of the Joint Finance Committee, without any public explanation, has blocked the largest land conservation project in state history. The Pelican River Forest project would protect from inappropriate and piecemeal development more than 70,000 acres of forestland for public recreation and forestry. This project in northern Wisconsin is supported across the political spectrum. Most of the money for the project would come from the federal government, not the state. Nonetheless, one legislator, cowardly hiding behind the cloak of anonymity, is stopping this key effort to protect our Northwoods.

The Pelican River Forest will be used for sustainable forest management and will be open to the public for hunting, fishing, hiking and cross-country skiing. Protection is essential to water quality because the forest area includes 68 miles of streams, 27,000 acres of forest wetlands, the headwaters of the Wolf River and numerous spring heads and tributaries of the Wisconsin River. Without protection, the area is threatened with sell-off and development of dispersed parcels, which would fragment the forest and limit job supporting forestry, public recreation, wildlife habitat and waterway quality.

When Republican legislators previously stopped key conservation efforts, Gov. Tony Evers wisely found a way to move ahead with five stalled projects using federal funds. One of those was Cedar Gorge, an amazing steep gorge along Lake Michigan in rapidly growing Ozaukee County. A developer wanted to build McMansions in this fragile and irreplaceable natural area. Despite overwhelming support from local residents for protection, an anonymous legislator was doing the developer’s bidding and blocking the conservation effort.

Evers should again step up and go ahead with protecting the Pelican River Forest. The law requires the Joint Finance Committee to schedule a public meeting for its objection to the purchase to be valid.

Embarrassed by their action, they have failed to meet this legal requirement for transparency and accountability. Therefore, Evers, who used his power to protect Cedar Gorge, now has the legal authority to conserve the Pelican River Forest for all of us.

This column was original published by the Cap Times.

Spencer Black served for 26 years in the state Assembly.

Categories: Environment, Op-Ed, Politics

6 thoughts on “Op Ed: Anonymous Legislator Undermining State Stewardship Fund”

  1. GodzillakingMKE says:

    Republicans are cowards to the core.

  2. Neal Brenard says:

    Hey Bruce, Jeremy: Don’t you guys have a style guide for writers on this site? In the following sentence of this post:

    “Love of our outdoors unites Wisconsinites across all our usual fault lines: urban, suburban and rural, Democrat, Republican and independent.”

    why allow the use of asymmetrical proper adjectives “Democrat” and “Republican?” Democrat is not an adjective, it is a noun. The proper form, of course, is Democratic, which is likewise, the correct identifier of the Democratic Party. You allow your guest writers to sound like idiots. Many of them likely are, but it reflects badly on Urban Milwaukee that you don’t correct their bad writing.

  3. Mingus says:

    How come the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty isn’t filing some legal action in this case demanding that all records on voting for the Joint Finance Committee on the Stewardship program be made public? This firm is always ready to sue some school board over some real or imagined violation of somebody’s rights or a distorted view on the States open records law. WILL has never taken real democracy in this State seriously.

  4. Jaimcb says:

    Hey Neal, why can’t “Democrat” stand as a noun in Spencer Black’s sentence? It’s totally consistent. Why not focus on the republicans who are constantly and deliberately using “democrat” as a modifier?

  5. gerrybroderick says:

    This is another case that demonstrates the Republican legislature’s utter disregard for not just transparency, but the well being of our ecological heritage. While the motive can’t be assumed , I’d lean toward the belief that private real estate interests are at play here. Might that be the reason for anonymity? This really needs boots-on-the-ground reporting starting with Oneida County’s legislative representatives.

  6. Neal Brenard says:

    Hey Jaimcb: Read the sentence again. “…urban, suburban, and rural, Democrat, Republican, and Independent.” Which of these six words is not like the other? Democrat is not an adjective. The others all are. The first adjectival clause: “…urban, suburban, and rural….” is a set of adjectives that describe location of persons. The second: “…Democrat, Republican, and Independent.” should, be a set of symmetrical proper adjectives that describe the political affiliation of persons. Democrat is a proper noun. Its adjectival form is Democratic which would be the correct word to use in the clause quoted.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us