Please Submit Maps to Legislature
Vos has welcomed this, apparently fearing he’d look bad for overtly opposing non-partisan redistricting.
Speaker Robin Vos has invited Wisconsinites to submit maps to the Legislature, and we all should take him up on that invitation.
The more maps that citizen activists submit, the more pressure there will be on the Legislature not to rig the maps.
Vos’s surprise invitation was a tacit acknowledgment of the great work that’s been done on nonpartisan redistricting by two groups.
The first group is the activist community — all of us — that have raised the issue of nonpartisan redistricting to new heights over the last few years, demanding transparency and public participation.
And the second group is the People’s Maps Commission, which has been a model of transparency and a model for bringing the public into the process. (Thanks to many of you, it received more than 800 maps from citizens this summer.)
Fearing he’d look bad by not mimicking the People’s Maps Commission, Vos has provided us with a website “to provide input on the 2021 redistricting process.” The website says you can “create a full statewide plan,” “create a regional plan,” or “identify a community of interest.”
If you already submitted a map to the People’s Maps Commission, you can upload that one to the Legislature’s website.
And if you haven’t submitted one yet, the website offers you some handy software programs that you can use to create your map.
Either way, please submit your statewide map, regional plan, or community of interest.
And don’t feel penned in by a couple of the criteria the Legislature offers for drawing the maps, as they seem to be trying to stack the deck in favor of the rigged lines from 2011.
You will, of course, need to create a map that has roughly the same number of people in each district. That’s a legal requirement.
But you don’t need to worry about “core constituency,” one of the criteria the Legislature lists.
It defines this as “the measure of how many people will stay in the same district after the enactment of the new districts.” But since the old districts were rigged in one of the worst gerrymanders in modern American history, according to a ruling in the federal court, those lines should not weigh heavily on you as you draw your map.
And you don’t have to worry about “staggered term disenfranchisement,” a phrase I’d never heard of before. The website says it “refers to people who did not vote for State Senator in 2020 and would not get to vote for State Senator in 2022. During this redistricting cycle, this occurs when a voter is “moved” from an odd-numbered district under the old plan to an even-numbered district under a new plan.”
Any redistricting runs a risk that a small number of voters may fall into this category, but by stressing this criteria, the Legislature is again showing its preference for clinging to the rigged maps of 2011.
Just draw the districts the fairest you think they should be drawn, and send them in.
Then the ball will be in Vos’s court.
It’s one thing to solicit citizen input, which is a good thing in and of itself. But it’s another thing, and an even better thing, to take that citizen input into account when you are doing the actual drawing of the new maps.
Vos has solicited the input, so let’s provide it.
And then let’s call his bluff if he doesn’t use it.