State Rep. LaKeshia Myers
Op Ed

Star Spangled Banner Has Links to Slavery

Which is why I voted against mandating its singing at sports events.

By - May 18th, 2021 11:44 am
The seating bowl at the Fiserv Forum. Photo by Jack Fennimore.

The seating bowl at the Fiserv Forum. Photo by Jack Fennimore.

Before anyone draws any misinformed conclusions about my stance on the “Star Spangled Banner,” let me set the record straight; I am very patriotic. Being the niece and cousin of veterans who have served in every military action since the Korean War, my love for service members and appreciation for their sacrifice is second to none. What I am not, is blind. I’m not blind to history, past or present, that would seek to ignore, diminish, or revise the experiences of African Americans and other people of color in the United States, and that is why I did not vote to mandate the playing of the national anthem at all sporting events in the state of Wisconsin.

My issue with the “Star Spangled Banner” has more to do with its lyrics and ideology of its author than any assessment of my (or any other American’s) perceived patriotism. Quite frankly, if one was to assess and measure anyone’s patriotism, they should begin with the author of the “Star Spangled Banner”, Francis Scott Key.

Key, a former lawyer and amateur poet, was born to massive slaveholding wealth in Maryland. When he penned the poem in September 1814, after the Battle of Fort McHenry, America had been at war for over two years. Key knew what America was fighting for—Northern and Westward expansion, continued interests in the transatlantic slave trade (Great Britain abolished slavery in 1807), and to establish itself as a world power; all of which would be achieved by the war’s end. Consequences of the war of 1812 included: establishment of a separate Canadian state (with current borders intact), continued participation in the brokerage of enslaved people, and broken treaties with American Indian nations in the North West which paved the way for western expansion of the US.

Perhaps this is what Key meant when he wrote the fourth stanza, which says:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,

That the havoc of war and the battle’s confusion

A home and a Country should leave us no more?

Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution.

No refuge could save the hireling and slave

From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave,

And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave

O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Enslaved people fought for both the Americans and British during the War of 1812. According to historian Alan Taylor, nearly five thousand enslaved Blacks took their chances with the freedom-promising British invaders during the War of 1812, providing strategic intelligence, access to supplies, general labor, and even military might in the form of organized units of black marines serving under white officers (Taylor, 2013).

By his fifties, Francis Scott Key became an adviser to President Andrew Jackson, who was also a wealthy southern slave owner. According to Jamie Stiehm of The Undefeated, “Key was named the U.S. district attorney for the nation’s capital, where he prosecuted race and slavery laws to the fullest extent, even to the death penalty. He also aggressively prosecuted early abolitionists, who had founded the anti-slavery movement in 1833” (Stiehm, 2018).

Achieving political patronage for himself not being enough, Francis Scott Key was influential and eventually compelled Andrew Jackson to name his brother-in-law, Roger Taney, to his Cabinet and then as Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Roger Taney, who is principally remembered for adjudging the Dred Scott decision in 1857, which determined that Dred Scott, who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the territory of Wisconsin did not entitle him to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that, as someone’s property, Mr. Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court. The majority opinion authored by Roger B. Taney also stated that Congress had no power to exclude slavery from the territories (thus invalidating the Missouri Compromise of 1820) and that African Americans could never become U.S. citizens.

Even in the present age, the lyrics of the “Star Spangled Banner” still speak to the “peculiar institution” of slavery and the “otherness” historically levied upon African Americans. When we assess patriotism, we often do so by counting the number of and size of American flags displayed and through the knowledge of words and songs dedicated to memory. But to honor and understand the truest form of patriotism, we must judge it by telling the truth of America. Acknowledging that we are an imperfect union of deeply complex personalities, and that we have never truly reconciled with the fact that race (and racism) has had a prominent place within the making and maintenance of our nation.

This is why James Armstrong carried the American flag across the Edmond Pettus Bridge on Bloody Sunday; why John Carlos and Tommy Smith raised their fists in protest during the Olympics in 1968; it is why Colin Kaepernick took a knee; why Congressman James Clyburn introduced legislation to change the national anthem to “Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing”; and why I voted “no” last Wednesday on the assembly floor. Because we, the people must develop within ourselves our own authentic relationship with this country and from it exude our own definition of patriotism, anything else would be un-American.

State Rep. LaKeshia Myers represents the 12th Assembly District.

Categories: Op-Ed, Politics

3 thoughts on “Op Ed: Star Spangled Banner Has Links to Slavery”

  1. sbaldwin001 says:

    I feel as though this perspective is based on many loose and questionable facts. I have no doubt that Francis Scott Key may have been a less-than-perfect citizen from our current point of view, but he was a man of his time. Our union has progressed and become “more perfect” since then, although this task that requires continuous effort.

    Furthermore, I would guess that Mr. Key was more interested in honoring the men of Fort McHenry when he wrote the song than he was in promoting slavery or in pushing American political agendas. And I doubt the racial discrimination protesters mentioned in the last paragraph were aware of song’s history and objecting to it. They had bigger issues on their minds.

    Regarding Mr. Key’s access to political patronage, I can recall a number of African American candidates on the most recent Milwaukee ballot, as well as many current office holders, who come from the same, well-connected political families.

    I do not hear feminists or other groups calling for a revocation of our national anthem, although maybe it is time for a change. However, do not forget that 200 years of Americans, including African Americans, have lived for, fought for, died for and been honored by that song. Their sacrifices should not be take lightly.

  2. Bellski says:

    And I assume that this is why the 4th stanza is not sung. Nothing to see here, move along…

  3. mkwagner says:

    I fear Rep. Myer’s point was lost on sbaldwin001. That is, this country is, “an imperfect imperfect union of deeply complex personalities, and that we have never truly reconciled with the fact that race (and racism) has had a prominent place within the making and maintenance of our nation.”

    The measure of patriotism cannot be measured by how many or how big the US flags we display. It should not be measured by one’s ability to sing an almost unsingable English drinking song. (Scott Keys poem, In Defense of Fort McHenry, was set to the popular drinking song, To Anacreon in Heaven.)

    No veteran living or dead fought FOR the US flag or The Star Spangled Banner. They fought for their families and communities; they fought for the ideals enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and our US Constitution; they fought for the promise that they and their descendants might share in the American Dream.

    Rep. Myers did not call for the revocation of the Star Spangled Banner as our national anthem. She is calling for an honest look at our history. She asks that we not blindly follow a flag or sing a song, but to consider how this country got to where we are today. To be truly patriotic requires an honest assessment of our triumphs and failures. We have to own our warts and seek forgiveness for the wounds this country has caused. There is no undoing of the past. What is possible is reconciliation with our past and recommitment to the ideals behind our imperfect union.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us