Wisconsin Public Radio

Police Reform Task Force Unveils Proposals

Recommendations include a statewide use of force policy and requiring law enforcement to maintain and share disciplinary files.

By , Wisconsin Public Radio - Apr 21st, 2021 07:26 pm
Police Administration Building, 951 N. James Lovell St. Photo by Christopher Hillard.

Police Administration Building, 951 N. James Lovell St. Photo by Christopher Hillard.

A bipartisan group tasked with proposing changes to Wisconsin laws on policing has released 18 recommendations, including limiting use of choke holds and creating new reporting requirements for use of force.

The group, which included two state lawmakers and 17 representatives from law enforcement and community organizations, is part of a larger legislative task force on racial disparities and policing. The task force was created last summer in the wake of widespread unrest following the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis and severe injury of Jacob Blake in Kenosha.

In a prepared statement Wednesday, task force co-chair Rep. Shelia Stubbs, D-Madison, said the goal is to “end racial disparities that exist at every age and in every aspect of a person’s life across the State of Wisconsin.”

“Devastating instances of police violence highlighted the need to reform our policing system,” Stubbs said. “As a legislator, and as a Black mother, I could not stand by as these events tarnished the relationship between the community, and law enforcement.”

The task force’s recommendations address use of force, police oversight and accountability and officer training. Also included are proposals for expanding community engagement. Some proposals, like a plan to create a statewide standard for use of force, are similar to previous proposals from Gov. Tony Evers. Other plans, like the group’s recommendation to limit choke holds, doesn’t go as far as Evers’ plan.

The governor’s proposal would have banned choke holds entirely. The group’s recommendations call for limiting choke holds to life-threatening situations or for officers’ self-defense.

Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke, R-Kaukauna, co-chairs the task force. He told WPR that preserving the use of choke holds for some situations could prevent more serious injuries.

“What Gov. Evers’ legislation doesn’t take into account is if you take that tool out of the toolbox for law enforcement in the case of life-or-death struggles, they’re much more likely to go for their weapon, which could end up in higher cases of fatalities or injuries than if they’re allowed to use that choke hold,” Steineke said.

The governor also called for a statewide ban on no-knock warrants. Steineke said the task force came to the conclusion that it didn’t have enough information about use of such warrants to recommend banning them. Instead, the group calls for the state Department of Justice to collect data on their use from local, state and federal law enforcement agencies before a recommendation is made. Steineke also pointed out some law enforcement officials argue no-knock warrants are valuable in certain situations, like when trying to recover a kidnapping victim.

Task force recommendations that broadly align with previously released bills from Evers include:

  • Creating a statewide standard for use of force. However, the group couldn’t agree on what that standard should be.
  • Supporting state grant programs for community programs that work to prevent violence.
  • Requiring law enforcement agencies to post use-of-force policies online.
  • Creating penalties for people who unnecessarily call police with the intent of creating conflict or other negative outcomes, like harassment or embarrassment.
  • Requiring the DOJ to collect statewide data about use-of-force incidents.
  • Requiring law enforcement agencies to maintain employment files for officers that include things like performance reviews and disciplinary actions, and to make those files available to other agencies.

Steineke also pointed out the group came up with several new plans that hadn’t been part of previous proposals or debate.

“This package of legislation breaks new ground in new ways,” he said. “The new legislation coming out of this is really important for transparency and accountability — those are areas that if we had just gone forward last year without these discussions, we would have missed.”

Evers called a special session of the Legislature last August to take up his policing bills. Republican leaders convened and adjourned the session without taking action, saying they needed more time to consider possible law changes.

The new proposals unveiled by the task force Wednesday include:

  • Requiring law enforcement who witness another officer using an unreasonable amount of force to report the incident to their supervisor.
  • Creating whistleblower protections for law enforcement who report use-of-force incidents they believe went too far.
  • Creating an independent use-of-force advisory board that would include members “representing diverse demographics who may be disproportionately impacted by use-of-force incidents.”
  • Recommending all active-duty law enforcement wear body cameras and requiring camera activation in certain situations. The proposal also calls for state funding to help support departments’ purchase of cameras.
  • Requiring law enforcement agencies to adopt a written policy regarding drug and alcohol testing of officers involved in critical incidents with the public.
  • Requiring officers to submit to a psychological examination to “determine the individual’s personality characteristics and suitability to perform the duties of an officer.”
  • Requiring officers employed as school resource officers to complete specialized training, including training on “employment in an educational environment” and deescalation techniques.
  • Recommending officers complete a specified number of hours of crisis-management training.
  • Creating additional grounds on which the Law Enforcement Standards Board may decertify an officer, including an officer being convicted of domestic abuse.
  • Expanding crisis program grants to fund collaborations between law enforcement agencies and behavioral health programs.

Steineke said he expects the proposals to be formally introduced as legislation later this spring, which is several months later than lawmakers initially expected at the outset of the task force.

He said the proposals hadn’t been widely circulated among lawmakers before the report’s release, but he’s optimistic about getting bipartisan support for the plans.

“It’s hard to imagine where the pushback would come from,” he said. “I have confidence, based on what I’ve heard so far, this will have support to pass our house and hopefully get through the Senate as well.”

Listen to the WPR report here.

Proposed Changes To Wisconsin Policing Laws Unveiled was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.

3 thoughts on “Police Reform Task Force Unveils Proposals”

  1. mkwagner says:

    All these proposals look like window dressing. They do not get at the root cause of the problems. They leave intact the polce occupation-force mentality in communities of color.

    Where are the proposals to mandate that beat officers come from the community in which they serve? This means repealing the residency statutes passed under the Walker administration and then going beyond that. White officers should not be assigned to districts that are majority minority UNLESS they grew up in or live in that district.

    Where are the proposals to more adequately finance programs that have a proven track record of reducing poverty, the underlying cause of most crime. Where are the proposals to increase school-funding, health care, drug rehab resources, affordable housing, and business investments for marginalized communities. They are not a part of these 18 proposals because these proposals are all about tweaking a broken system.

    To truly reform policing in this country, the police motto “Serve and Protect” must apply first and foremost to people of the communities in which they serve. PDs’ primary responsibility must to residents and not wealthy visitors who come and go but have no lasting presence.

  2. sbaldwin001 says:

    Regarding: “All active-duty law enforcement wear body cameras and requiring camera activation in certain situations. The proposal also calls for state funding to help support departments’ purchase of cameras.”

    I really hope the details of this recommendation are fully specified before it is considered for implementation. A few of the many questions include:

    How long will the data be kept?
    Who controls access and release?
    What are the exact circumstances for activation?
    How with this affect police budgets?

    Police body cameras and police surveillance systems should not be implemented on a “make the rules as you go along” basis.

    Also, be advised: With this recommendation we are sending police departments down a road where they become increasingly technology-oriented. The consequences will be more money and more resources will go into technology and technology support – leaving less money and resources for community patrols and community relations. We may regret this change in emphasis.

  3. blurondo says:

    In addition to the previous comments, here is a piece recently authored by an occassional contributor to Urban Milwaukee. It has insight into a very significant issue invovling police reform.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us