State Supreme Court Hearing Challenge to Governor’s Emergency Powers
Conservative petitioner donated $20,000 to Justice Rebecca Bradley in 2016.
The move came the day after Wisconsin set new single-day highs for COVID-19 cases and deaths, and as COVID-19 hospitalizations continued their record climb.
The court’s conservative justices agreed to hear the case through what’s known as an “original action,” which lets plaintiffs bypass the usual trial and appeals processes.
Evers issued the mask mandate using a state law that gives governors the power to order 60-day public health emergencies in Wisconsin. It’s different than the law his administration used earlier this year to issue its “Safer at Home” order, which was struck down in May by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Evers has used his powers to declare three public health emergencies this year. The first came March 12, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The second, on July 30, led to the first mask mandate and came as COVID-19 cases were beginning to climb. And the third, on Sept. 22, extended the mask mandate as COVID-19 cases were surging on University of Wisconsin campuses.
Fabick’s challenge argues state law prevents a governor from issuing multiple emergency orders for the same pandemic unless extensions are granted by the Legislature.
Justices scheduled oral arguments in the case for Monday, Nov. 16.
While Fabick’s challenge was the first to reach the Wisconsin Supreme Court, an earlier lawsuit challenging the mask mandate was unsuccessful at the trial court level.
In that lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of three plaintiffs by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), St. Croix County Judge Michael Waterman sided with the governor, ruling there was nothing in state law that prevented him from issuing multiple public health emergencies.
The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices called attention to that case in a dissent written by Justice Rebecca Dallet.
“Our original-action jurisdiction is not meant to allow a single, disgruntled taxpayer to jump the line to achieve a desired outcome,” Dallet wrote. “Granting Fabick’s petition is the latest step in the majority’s efforts to transform this court from one of last resort to the first stop for any discontented Wisconsinite.”
In a separate order Wednesday, justices denied a request by WILL to have its appeal heard alongside Fabick’s case.
For Fabick, this was the second “original action” petition he’s filed with the Supreme Court challenging public health orders issued by the governor or his administration during the COVID-19 pandemic.
He was one of two plaintiffs to file a petition for original action challenging the “Safer at Home” order in May. Justices eventually declared that challenge moot after they struck down “Safer at Home” in another lawsuit filed by Republican legislators.
Fabick has been an active donor in Wisconsin political campaigns, according to a review of state records by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.
Fabick has donated more than $350,000 to Wisconsin candidates between January 1994 and June 2020, according to the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. The group said about 88 percent of those donations went to Republican candidates, while 6 percent went to Democrats.
The remaining 6 percent was spent on “nonpartisan” races in the form of a single $20,000 donation to Bradley’s campaign. Justices are officially nonpartisan in Wisconsin, although Bradley’s campaign was backed by Republicans.
The current mandate lasts until Nov. 21.
In addition to the lawsuits by Fabick and WILL, another lawsuit has been filed challenging the Evers administration’s restrictions on crowd capacity at bars and restaurants. A state appeals court sided with plaintiffs in that case and blocked the Evers administration’s order.
While justices agreed to hear Fabick’s case, it’s unclear how the Supreme Court might rule. When the court struck down “Safer at Home” in May, it had a 5-2 conservative majority, a margin that has since been trimmed to 4-3.
That puts the focus squarely on conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn, who joined the court’s liberals in voting to uphold “Safer at Home.”
Listen to the WPR report here.
Wisconsin Supreme Court To Hear Lawsuit Challenging Statewide Mask Mandate was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
- WI Daily: 513 New COVID-19 Cases Reported - Urban Milwaukee - May 14th, 2021
- Fully Vaccinated People Can Resume Activities Without Masks - Wisconsin Department of Health Services - May 14th, 2021
- Bill Would Ban UW-System Vaccine Requirements - Henry Redman - May 14th, 2021
- WI Daily: 485 New COVID-19 Cases Reported - Urban Milwaukee - May 13th, 2021
- State Approves COVID-19 Vaccine for Kids 12 and Older - Erik Gunn - May 13th, 2021
- Brewers Home Games to be at Full Capacity Beginning June 25 - Milwaukee Brewers - May 13th, 2021
- Milwaukee Removing Most COVID-19 Restrictions on June 15th - Jeramey Jannene - May 13th, 2021
- Wisconsin Now Offering COVID-19 Vaccinations to Children Ages 12-15 - Wisconsin Department of Health Services - May 12th, 2021
- WI Daily: 558 New COVID-19 Cases Reported - Urban Milwaukee - May 12th, 2021
- WILL Sues Biden Administration for Race, Sex Discrimination in Allocation of COVID Relief Funds for Restaurants - Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty - May 12th, 2021
Read more about Coronavirus Pandemic here
- Court Watch: Why Court Voided Evers Emergency Order - Gretchen Schuldt - Apr 5th, 2021
- Statement by Heartland Institute Director Jeré Fabick on WI Supreme Court Victory Against Gov. Tony Evers - Heartland Institute - Mar 31st, 2021
- Senator Agard: Statement on Supreme Court Decision - State Sen. Melissa Agard - Mar 31st, 2021
- Wisconsin’s Hyperpartisan Supreme Court is Endangering the Public - Democratic Party of Wisconsin - Mar 31st, 2021
- Wisconsin Supreme Court: Gov. Evers’ Multiple Emergency Declarations Violate Law - Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty - Mar 31st, 2021
- Rep. Hesselbein Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on Emergency Orders - State Rep. Dianne Hesselbein - Mar 31st, 2021
- Statement on Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision - State Sen. Jon Erpenbach - Mar 31st, 2021
- Gov. Evers Releases Statement Regarding Supreme Court Decision - Gov. Tony Evers - Mar 31st, 2021
- Rep. Hintz: Statement on Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling - State Rep. Gordon Hintz - Mar 31st, 2021
- State Supreme Court Overrules Evers’ Emergency Powers - Laurel White - Mar 31st, 2021
Read more about Statewide Mask Mandate here