Federal Lawsuit Challenges Local “Safer at Home” Orders
Two plaintiffs are Republican candidates for office, another is a Milwaukee pastor.
Protesters at the Wisconsin State Capitol on April 24, 2020. Photo by Brad Horn/Wisconsin Watch.
A new federal lawsuit challenges local public health orders across the state, arguing that they violate the 17 plaintiff’s constitutional rights to freely assemble and exercise their religion.
The lawsuit follows a ruling last week by the Wisconsin Supreme Court that struck down a statewide order from the Department of Health Services.
Two of the plaintiffs in the new suit are Republicans running for office, including Cindy Werner who intends to run against incumbent Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-Milwaukee) for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. Jay Schroeder is vying to represent the 55th Wisconsin Assembly district in the Fox Valley.
Milwaukee pastor Dan Quakkelaar is also a plaintiff. He leads Friend of Sinners Mission church.
The state ruling did not explicitly reference local orders, instead dealing with DHS Secretary-designee Andrea Palm‘s use of a different state statute.
Defendants in the new lawsuit include Palm, Governor Tony Evers, Milwaukee Health Commissioner Jeanette Kowalik, the Wisconsin Elections Commission and a host of other local officials.
Milwaukee, the City of Racine and Dane County are some of the only municipalities and counties in the state that have local health orders still in effect. A number of other orders were rescinded after being issued or are expiring, including a joint order covering the Milwaukee County suburbs.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul issued an opinion last week that the local orders are legal. Evers and his chief legal counsel Ryan Nilsestuen defended the orders on Thursday during a media briefing.
“We will be defending against that lawsuit, we believe it should be dismissed,” said Neilsetuen. “I am optimistic this lawsuit will go nowhere.”
Mayor Tom Barrett said if courts were to strike down local health orders, he would question what powers local officials have. “Then I think you have to question if health departments have a right to exist, if fire codes have a right to exist,” he said on Thursday afternoon. He said he did not believe the city had been too broad in issuing its order and subsequent revisions.
Barrett, in multiple press briefings, and Kaul, in his legal opinion, noted that the state supreme court ruling dealt with a separate state statute and did not address local orders.
The local orders are issued under state statute 252.03.
A copy of the lawsuit is available on Urban Milwaukee.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
Instead of a lawsuit, wouldn’t it be more expeditious to have Pastor Dan Quakkelaar use the power of prayer– pray to alll-powerful, all-knowing God to eliminate Covid-19 and the need for “Safer at Home”? Who needs ventilators when you have God?
I always find it interesting that there are a number of Christian Congregations in this Country who seem to be more iinterested in being part of fringe right-wing Republican political movements than demanding that politicians follow the teachings of Matthew 25: 40-46.
I wonder if Reverand Quakkelearr read about Reverand Gerald O. Glenn of the New Deliverance Evangelistic Church of Chesterfield, Virginia. He preached against the State at Home order banning large group gatherings for churches and died of Covid-19.
Frankly, I consider those who so loudly proclaim their ‘christian’ beliefs just prior to insisting upon acts that will disadvantage those who are less advantaged – –
I do not consider those folks to be true Christians, in the sense of those who follow the teachings of Jesus.