Jeramey Jannene
City Hall

Barrett Kicks Off 2020 Budget Process

Numbers are daunting. City between a rock and a hard place when it comes to finances.

By - Aug 16th, 2019 01:24 pm
Mayor Tom Barrett describes the city budget process at the 2019 preliminary budget hearing. Photo by Jeramey Jannene.

Mayor Tom Barrett describes the city budget process at the 2019 preliminary budget hearing. Photo by Jeramey Jannene.

The debate surrounding the city’s 2020 budget got underway Thursday evening at the Zeidler Municipal Building. The budget, similar to last year, will again cause elected officials to weigh public safety funding against city services including alley repair and expanded funding for public health programs.

Mayor Tom Barrett, budget director Dennis Yaccarino and Common Council Finance & Personnel Committee chair Alderwoman Milele A. Coggs solicited feedback on the approximately $1.5 billion budget at a public hearing.

“This is really an attempt to educate the public and explain the biggest challenges I face each year,” said Barrett in a 45-minute presentation on the city’s precarious financial position.

Four factors are combining to put city officials in an increasingly difficult place: the rising costs of public safety, a quickly growing need to fund the city’s pension system, state restrictions on raising revenue and declining revenue sharing from the state.

State law both caps the city’s property tax levy with few exceptions and prevents it from raising new revenue from other sources including a sales tax or income tax. An even greater problem, state budget allocations have reduced the amount of shared revenue sent to Milwaukee and other municipalities since 2003, with no adjustments for inflation.

A city report notes that if the city received its 2003 allotment adjusted for inflation it would have received $333.9 million in 2018; instead it received $228.2 million, an effective annual loss of $105.7 million. Over the same time, annual state spending has increased by $7 billion.

Barrett repeatedly stated that state officials need to return the shared revenue program to its original purpose of returning locally-generated revenue or it must give the authority to “go it alone” and raise its own revenue. He said for years that out-state politicians have run campaigns saying Milwaukee needs to solve its own problems, and city officials are willing to do so if given the authority.

“That’s why I have gone to Madison time and time again to say this system is broken,” said Barrett.

The declining shared revenue would be a big problem for the city all on its own, but the city has also faced steadily increasing public safety costs despite eliminating over 400 full-time equivalent positions from the police and fire departments since 2004.

“Beginning in 2016 the budget for the Milwaukee Police Department exceeded the property tax levy for the city,” said Barrett. “This creates an impossible mathematical situation.”

It’s going to get worse. Despite the fact that property values are growing, increasing the property tax levy, a new major cost has emerged for the city: employee pensions. The city’s annual pension contribution is expected to more than double in four years, consuming an additional $90 million annually.

City officials avoided having to make any pension contributions from 2004 to 2009 despite the city charter requiring the system to be fully funded. But that run of luck ended as the Great Recession hammered the financial markets.

In 2019, the city will contribute approximately $70 million to the pension system. Approximately 80 percent of that will go to support public safety employees that are exempt from Act 10.

Following the shock of having to make a nearly $40 million payment in 2009, the city uses a five-year smoothing formula from an actuarial consultant. When the current term expires in 2023, consultants are warning city officials to expect to have to start paying $160 million annually.

According to the mayor’s office, the primary driver in the increase is a change in the expected performance of the system’s assets. The anticipated return has been reduced from eight percent to 7.5 percent annually.

Debt service payments have also grown during Barrett’s tenure. In 2004, the city spent $54 million on debt service. In 2019 that total grew to $68.6 million. The mayor told the audience that concerns about debt were valid, but were not the biggest issue the city was facing.

There is good news: the city continues to make strides in avoiding the national problem of surging health care costs. Costs have only risen $8 million since 2012. “If this would have followed a national trend we would be paying an extra $50 million,” said Yaccarino. The budget director said improved employee safety training has also reduced injuries, saving money and improving employee health.

The city also saves approximately $4 million per year by prepaying its pensions obligations.

What’s not in the budget? Yaccarino, no doubt at the request of Barrett, took special care to point out that the 2020 budget will not include any property tax funds going to support The Hop or Democratic National Convention. Both efforts are planned to be reimbursed by federal grants and sponsorships.

Community Feedback

What do community members want to see? A primary desire is for a reallocation of public safety resource towards violence prevention.

Dozens of representatives of Black Leaders Organizing for Communities (BLOC) packed the hearing room, with organization political director Rick Banks being the first to speak.

“Right now our budget says we value policing and incarceration more than peace and violence prevention,” said Banks.

He singled out the efforts of Andre Lee Ellis and his “We Got This” program as an example of where funding should be going. “That’s violence prevention,” said Banks to applause, including from Barrett.

Activist Paul Mozina testified in favor of the city working to end its enforcement of the War on Drugs. Others testified about the need for better public infrastructure and more funding for lead abatement.

Multiple people testified that they would gladly go with Barrett to testify in Madison for more revenue.

Due to a scheduling conflict, Urban Milwaukee wasn’t able to stay for the entire public testimony period.

Barrett will present a final budget to the Common Council in late September. The Common Council’s Finance & Personnel Committee will then go line-by-line through the document before voting on a final budget in November.

View Barrett’s entire presentation.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here. 

Categories: City Hall, Politics

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us