Op Ed

State Stewardship Fund Too Costly

Total land purchased, put aside is the size of Delaware. Program should be cut back.

By - May 1st, 2019 01:55 pm
Get a daily rundown of the top stories on Urban Milwaukee
Western Terminus of the Ice Age National Scenic Trail. Photo by MDuchek at English Wikipedia. Photo is in the Public Domain.

Western Terminus of the Ice Age National Scenic Trail. Photo by MDuchek at English Wikipedia. Photo is in the Public Domain.

In Wisconsin, our natural resources are an essential part of who we are as a state. We value our outdoor traditions and the stewardship program has helped Wisconsinites preserve natural areas and expand access to recreational activities, all of which are beneficial.

Despite being well intentioned upon enactment in 1989, the stewardship program primarily allows the state to purchase land it cannot otherwise afford, through borrowing, pushing costs onto future generations. Initially authorized for a 10 year term, the program provided $250 million in total borrowing authority to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but, in recent years, has grown exponentially in size and scope. Unfortunately, similar to many government programs, the stewardship fund has grown beyond its original intent, while leaving Wisconsin in a financial bind.

To the detriment of Wisconsinites, the stewardship program has accumulated far too much land, has incurred staggering debt, and has resulted in decreased funds for vital state needs. Currently, the DNR has either purchased or protected 1.8 million acres of land and the debt currently owed is $795 million. To put the land acquisition in perspective, that is more acreage than the entire state of Rhode Island or Delaware. Moreover, when land is owned by the state, it cannot be developed and is not on the tax rolls, impacting the ability of local communities to generate revenue. The program, in its current form, has run its course. The days of responsible borrowing are long gone.

It is incumbent upon the legislature and the budget writing committee to reform this program, to lower the risk to taxpayers, and to fund our top priorities. In 2015, lawmakers recognized the growing concern and required the DNR to sell 10,000 acres of land as a partial solution to rising costs. While a step in the right direction, further efforts are still needed to combat the excessive debt currently being incurred. The spending is so extreme that Wisconsin taxpayers are currently paying over a half a million dollars in interest every week on debt accumulated from the stewardship fund.

According to the non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the stewardship fund, since its creation, has cost Wisconsinites approximately $871 million. Should our colleagues propose to reauthorize the program for an additional 10 years in this budget, the program would need to borrow an additional $332 million, an estimate that does not include interest. In total, with borrowed interest, taxpayers would be on the hook for $533 million. To make matters worse, that figure does not include the current $795 million in existing stewardship debt.

To be clear, if reauthorized, stewardship costs will soar to $1.329 billion dollars. In a budget in which Wisconsin needs significant investment in our roads, we need to seriously evaluate how we prioritize our spending. We must ask ourselves when enough is enough.

Wisconsin State Senator Tom Tiffany represents Wisconsin’s 12th Senate District. Wisconsin State Senator Duey Stroebel  represents Wisconsin’s 20th Senate District.

Categories: Environment, Op-Ed, Politics

One thought on “Op Ed: State Stewardship Fund Too Costly”

  1. mkwagner says:

    Is it really the stewardship fund that is costing Wisconsin taxpayers? Or is it the Republican legislatures’ refusal to take federal aid in the form of transportation and Medicaid dollars? What’s more, much of the lands being protected are wetlands, essential for managing flooding. Besides being part of Wisconsin’s thriving tourism business, these lands ensure natural mechanisms for filtering pollutants from our water and providing breathable air.

    For whom do Senators Tiffany and Stroebel work? Wisconsin taxpayers whose families have lived here for generations? Or land speculators who rape and pillage the land for profit and then leave the cost of clean up for Wisconsin taxpayers to shoulder?

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us