Bruce Murphy
Murphy’s Law

About That Republican Victory

Voters rejected Democrats for the Assembly, Robin Vos declares. Er, not exactly.

By - Nov 15th, 2018 11:39 am
Robin Vos

Robin Vos

Earth to Robin Vos.

Across the nation it’s now clear the election was a blue wave, with a seven point margin in the vote for Democrats that may yet rise to 7.5 percent. That’s bigger than the last two Republican waves, the 6.8 percent margin of 2010 and 7.1 percent in 1994. Democrats have now won 34 House seats, the most since their post-Watergate wave of 1974. And that total may get as high as 39 seats, and would be even higher if not for so many districts so badly gerrymandered by Republicans.

In Wisconsin the Democrats swept all four statewide offices, including governor, attorney general, treasurer and secretary of state, for the first time since 1986. And the unofficial results for the 99 assembly seats in the state show Republicans were well behind, getting just 1.1 million, or slightly less than 46 percent of the 2.4 million votes cast for those seats.

Yet, Rep. Robin Vos (R–Rochester), the Assembly Speaker, doesn’t see a blue wave at all. 

“The reality is that the voters of Wisconsin have chosen divided government,” he declared. “The state that elected Tony Evers as governor also chose 64 hardworking and passionate Republicans to represent areas throughout our great state.” So the election “cannot be seen as any kind of mandate for change.”

It’s true the Republicans won 63 of 99 Assembly seats. How is that possible when Democratic assembly candidates won slightly more than 54 percent of the vote? Because Vos and the Republicans passed a 2011 redistricting plan that packs Democratic voters into a minority of districts so that hundreds of thousands of their votes are wasted. The maps are “intentionally skewed” to create non-competitive districts, charged Dana Schultz, Executive Director of Wisconsin Voices, which supports redistricting. “We must redraw the district maps and bring fairness and balance back to our state legislature.”

To that end, Democrats will be re-filing a case with the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping it ultimately agrees with an earlier federal court ruling that found Wisconsin’s gerrymandering is unconstitutional. 

But for now Vos can continue to insist the world is upside down, and 54 percent of the vote is actually a defeat for Democratic policies. Vos has defiantly warned that Evers had better not try to roll back any of the changes passed by Walker and Republican lawmakers in the last eight years. 

“If he wants to poke Republicans in the eye, he will end up getting very little of what he wants,” Vos told the Wisconsin State Journal.

And because Vos thinks voters didn’t want any change, he and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) intend to pass laws to reduce the governor’s powers in a lame-duck session before Evers takes office.  

“I don’t want him to be able to walk in on day one and with the stroke of a pen undo things that the vast majority of the public supports and the Legislature and the governor signed into law,” Vos declared.

Two examples he noted were the Foxconn deal and voter ID rules. 

But Marquette Law School polls have consistently shown voters are lukewarm about Foxconn, with 55 percent saying they don’t believe it will benefit their communities. They would probably welcome a reduction in the $4.1 billion subsidy promised to a Taiwanese company. 

As for Voter ID, a majority of voters do support it and Evers has no chance to overturn the law. But he could change some rules quietly implemented on voter ID by Gov. Scott Walker, which were never the subject of public hearings.  

Vos and Fitzgerald want to roll back the governor’s power to make sure Evers can’t overturn rules passed by Walker. Apparently such rule making can only be trusted to Republican governors. That inconsistency was noted by state Sen. Luther Olsen (R-Ripon), who told The Associated Press, “The optics probably look bad.” 

Or as Democratic state Sen Jon Erpenbach (D-Middleton) put it: “If Republican leaders think that a lame-duck power grab is what Wisconsin asked for, they just aren’t listening” to voters. If Republicans are so worried about too much power for the governor, he added, they had eight years to address that problem and didn’t. 

Vos has also warned that the legislature won’t support increasing school funding, though the MU poll showed voters supported more school spending over property tax cuts by a margin of 55 percent to 40 percent. 

What we’re seeing here is a legislative tyrant used to ignoring the majority of voters on many issues, knowing he is protected by gerrymandered districts, and assuming Walker could never lose. And so Vos and the Republicans gave the governor powers they now regret.  

“When one part of government cedes power to the other, it’s never a smart move,” as Olsen lamented to the AP. 

Vos and company also ended the civil service system, which for more than a century assured that governors of either party couldn’t simply hire party loyalists to serve in state agencies. This, as I’ve argued, was by far the most radical and repugnant law passed in the Walker era. And I hope Ever pushes to overturn it. 

But if he instead decides to use it as Republicans did, he will have Vos and Fitzgerald to thank for handing him the ability to run a Democratic spoils system.  

Meanwhile, Vos and Fitzgerald must depend on lame duck Gov. Walker to aid and abet their nefarious plan to nullify the results of the election and reduce the power of the man the voters just elected. 

Will Walker do this? His predecessor, former Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle urged him to carefully consider. “There’s some obligation on a governor in that situation to not just be a partisan player anymore and be a protector of the office, and I hope the governor does that,” Doyle said. “I think that’s how many governors would see it.”

For Walker is about to join the ranks of Wisconsin’s ex-governors, where his sole claims are now on history. Does he really want to leave office with the stench of this legislation befouling his legacy? 

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.

Categories: Murphy's Law, Politics

7 thoughts on “Murphy’s Law: About That Republican Victory”

  1. blurondo says:

    The first commandment of the Tea Party is RETALIATE. As Maddow says, “Watch this space”.

  2. Thomas Martinsen says:


    Please ask Voss to respond point by point to this article, and to do so on this site. I doubt that he would do so, yet I relish the vision of his stumbling and stuttering through such an effort.

  3. Bruce Murphy says:

    Thomas, his communications person directed anyone with questions to his press releases, which I quoted.

  4. Paul Trotter says:

    Voss is the epitome of an arrogant power hungry politician. He will leave a stain on his party for years to come from this petty action.
    OIsen has never backed up his words with real action. Never. He is a puppet of Scott Walker and Scott Fitzgerald. Imagine how their behavior would change if they had to work to get elected. Their gerrymandered districts allow them to do anything they want without consequeces- a disgrace to democracy.

  5. Thomas Martinsen says:

    I will conveniently blame President Trump for giving me license to engage in name calling. Representative Robin Voss is a bottom dwelling slug of a legislator who routinely puts the interests of his political party over the interests of the people of this state. He is also a sissy if he hides behind a communication person’s press releases in lieu of answering questions posed by Bruce Murphy. Voss would better serve our state and his own indisposition by disappearing than by endeavoring to limit the powers of Governor elect Evers.

  6. Paul Trotter says:

    So Bruce – now it’s see my press release Vos? Vos does not hesitate to go on WTMJ or WISN to defend his vindictiveness. Both righty whitey stations will shake their head in agreement and refuse to ask a questions about this power grab. Karma brands really needs to look at how destructive WTMJ have been. iheart radio will never deviate from their 24/7 lies.

  7. Thomas Martinsen says:

    Paul T,

    I agree with your remarks on I heart radio. WTMJ a.m. talk radio functions chiefly as a shill for reactionaries. On the other hand, I think there is a slim hope on WISN television, where Mike Gousha hosts a weekly talk show on political issues.

    Gousha earned some gravitas by retiring early from a glamorous job as a local anchorman to seek more meaningful work. That gravitas was enhanced when he became a fellow of some sort at Marquette University. To his credit, Gousha asks some hard questions on his talk show. To his debit, he lets most of his guests spout boilerplate talking points in response – without challenging follow-up questions.

    I suspect that there is a chance that Bruce Murphy could persuade Gousha to get Robin Voss to appear on his show to address questions posed by Murphy. Such an interview could earn distinction for Gousha if he could keep Voss from relying entirely on partisan talking points. It cold be an Edward R. Murrow moment for Gousha if he could get to the point of asking Voss if he “had no shame.”

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us