Sheriff Candidates All Promise Big Changes
All three acknowledge budget constraints and need to improve department long run by David Clarke.
Milwaukee County Jail & Criminal Justice Facility. Photo by Daniel X. O’Neil (CC-BY).
In the race for Milwaukee County sheriff, all three Democrats hoping to win the August primary say they want to transform the department but acknowledge the incoming sheriff will be heading up an office strapped for resources.
Acting Sheriff Richard Schmidt said he’s already made improvements to the office since becoming acting sheriff after controversial conservative firebrand David Clarke resigned in 2017.
Schmidt’s campaign touts his open communication with media and efforts to improve community relations by creating a new task force.
If elected for a full term, Schmidt said he would focus on human trafficking and violent crime by creating more task forces with local and federal agencies.
Still, the Milwaukee County Jail, which saw multiple inmate deaths during Clarke’s tenure, remains a focus in the race.
Schmidt says he’s already made improvements by bringing in consultants. But Challenger Earnell Lucas, head of security for Major League Baseball, said real reform hasn’t happened in the jail under Schmidt.
Lucas is also critical of Schmidt who was second in command under Clarke.
If elected, Lucas said he would seek grants so he could hire people to oversee jail reforms and create greater accountability.
“We are going to overhaul procedures that, again, those persons that come in with either mental illnesses and/or preexisting conditions don’t find themselves in crises in our jail facility,” he said.
The third candidate, department Deputy Robert Ostrowski has said he would focus on how inmates are treated at the county jail but he also wants the department to focus on policing functions.
“We as an agency have gone away from most of those job duties,” he said. “We need to supplement the local police departments where we’re needed. So if they have a certain situation or an issue within their municipality that they can’t attack because they don’t have enough staff, the sheriff’s department should be stepping up and playing that role.”
Like his opponents, Ostrowski wants to partner with local organizations and increase the public’s involvement in crime preventing efforts.
He has said he plans to address staffing issues by eliminating unnecessary overtime and eliminating waste, including eliminating the number of staff members who have take-home squad cars unless they have to answer emergency calls.
Listen to the WPR report here.
In Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Race, Candidates Promise To Make Big Changes With Limited Resources was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
Schmidt has some explaining to do. When the pastor he spoke with last year said that in an abusive relationship it is the victim, not the abuser, who needs to change, why didn’t he object? Does he agree with that claim? Why does he suggest that a woman should not leave an abusive relationship when they instead should pray and stay? He says he is being attacked for being a person of faith. That is spinning and dodging. He should explain if his religious beliefs impact how he does his job since he suggested abused women stay in their relationships because God.
It’s important to remember that Milwaukee County is unique among all 72 counties in Wisconsin in that it is fully incorporated – every bit of the county is part of an incorporated city or village. Since each of those municipalities have their own police departments, the Milwaukee County Sheriff has no responsibility for day to day basic police work. In the other 71 counties, the sheriff has policing responsibility for unincorporated areas plus small villages that choose to contract with the county for this service.
Milwaukee County Sheriff candidates who talk about being “tough on crime” are talking about something that is not really in their portfolio. The main responsibilities of the Milwaukee County Sheriff are courthouse security, jail management, freeway patrol, and (in theory) security for county owned facilities (e.g.: parks, transit). The commitment to the latter has historically been inconsistent. Candidates and voters should focus on things that are within the portfolio of this office.