Court Watch

Trump Nominee Has Unjudicial Views

Wisconsin judge nominee Gordon Giampietro dams birth control, gay marriage, public schools.

By , Wisconsin Justice Initiative - Feb 16th, 2018 11:24 am
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
Gordon Giampietro

Gordon Giampietro

Criminals came from public schools, birth control pills are an assault on nature, and legal recognition of gay marriage could open the door to polygamy, according to Gordon Giampietro, President Trump‘s nominee to be a federal judge in Milwaukee.

Giampietro in 2014, commenting on a blog post, also wrote that “calls for diversity” are “code for relaxed standards (moral and intellectual),” Buzzed reported Thursday. The story included additional information about Giampietro, including comments he made during two interviews with radio host Lydia LoCoco and links to the audio of the shows.

The in-house lawyer for Northwestern Mutual Life, Giampietro is not a member of the Wisconsin Bar (he quit it in 2008), but is a member of the conservative Federalist Society. His court-room experience is limited: he has litigated, he told the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, about 31 cases to conclusion in his entire career. The number includes cases where he was not the primary lawyer.

His comments about public schools came during a 2002 interview with the Milwaukee Business Journal. Giampietro, a strong supporter the Milwaukee Parental Choice voucher program, said his views about the program were affected by what he saw growing up in Washington and by having a university professor for a father.

“I grew up next to lawyers, architects and crack dealers,” he told the paper. “The common denominator I saw was that the children who succeeded in Washington were in private schools, and the children who turned out to be criminals were in public schools.”

Giampietro, as a Choice advocate, appeared in opposition to a 1999 bill in the Wisconsin Legislature that would have prohibited discrimination against voucher school students based on “sex, race, religion, national origin, ancestry, creed, pregnancy, marital or parental status, sexual orientation or physical, mental, emotional or learning disability.”

Giampietro also told the conservative Heritage Foundation that an earlier Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction effort to ensure that voucher students enjoyed Constitutional protections “would have been an extraordinary expansion of government control.”

In 2014 and 2015 interviews with LoCoco on Relevant Radio, Giampietro explained some of his views related to sexual orientation. Recognition of same-sex marriage, he said, would undermine the “very idea of marriage.”

[inarticlead[LoCoco talked during the July 2014 interview about Thomas More, who was beheaded after refusing to recognize King Henry VIII as the head of the Church of England. More, she said, went to his death to follow his conscience and follow his God.

“Do you think those times are coming?” LoCoco asked.

“I think we always have to be prepared for them,” Giampietro responded. “Is it going to happen this year or next year, it’s hard to say. But I think at the end of the day, we’ve reached a point of, we’ve moved beyond civil society. When the government doesn’t allow people to disagree with it, to live in peace, what options are you giving those people to carry on? … It sounds alarmist, it sounds crazy, but we’re entering a very dangerous time in our history.”

In the July 2015 interview, not long after the U.S. Supreme Court did recognize gay marriage, Giampietro opined: “Given this constitutional principle that the Court has laid down there really is no principled reason polygamy isn’t the next thing to go. … There’s no limiting principle here. There’s no reason why it couldn’t be these other arrangements. …”

“The seeds for this problem go back decades, right?” he said. “As soon as the contraceptive mentality set root, what is the articulation for why marriage should be with opposite-sex couples? There isn’t one, unless society agrees that it has to do with the raising of children. And so we really are reaping what we sowed a few years ago.”

LoCoco continued the theme. “So when my husband rants and raves about every problem in the world and his answer to everything is, ‘It was the pill! It was the pill! He’s absolutely right. I mean, in a sense.’”

“Yes. Yes,” Giampietro said. “Because that’s an assault on nature. And anytime you assault nature there’s gonna be a backlash. And that’s what we’re seeing today. In all kinds of ways, not just with respect to contraception and marriage. Whenever you go against God’s plan, bad things are gonna happen.”

Gretchen Schuldt writes a blog for Wisconsin Justice Initiative, whose mission is “To improve the quality of justice in Wisconsin by educating the public about legal issues and encouraging civic engagement in and debate about the judicial system and its operation.

Categories: Court Watch, Politics

9 thoughts on “Court Watch: Trump Nominee Has Unjudicial Views”

  1. Terry says:

    This guy is a total far right wing nut job just like all the rest of Walker and Trump’s toadies.

    Dump all republican nut jobs 2018

  2. John Casper says:

    Gretchen, thank you.

    ICYMI,

    “It was Bannon and Priebus who kept having to remind him [Trump], and to endlessly repeat, that in one of the campaign’s few Mmasterful pieces of issue-defusing politics, and perfect courtship of the conservative base, it had let the Federalist Society produce a list of candidates. The campaign had promised that the nominee would come from that list—and needless to day, Giuliani wasn’t on it.”

    Wolff, Michael. Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House (pp. 86-87). Henry Holt and Co.. Kindle Edition.

    Giuliani flunked the Federalist Society’s purity test because he is pro-choice.

    Since the Federalist Society is anything but “non-partisan,” wonder if Wolff’s scoop threatens its 501(c)3 and President Trump’s judicial nominations?

  3. roz says:

    of course he was 45’s pick. he is as inarticulate as 45. well, ‘bad things are gonna happen’ with him on the bench.

  4. will says:

    Back to the dark-ages

  5. Patrick says:

    Are you all serious? Here’s a contradiction for you if you want to talk politics in the courts. Don’t even pretend like you’re not going to vote for one of them (see links below). We have finally gotten to the point in the life of a republic where people no longer respect the rule of law. This is a system of governance that will never produce a generation again that was as great as the one that the started it. People don’t think beyond their own emotion and respect only their own personal opinions. That has slowly kept into our courts starting with the left during the FDR era. It’s been an unfair match for 80 years in the courts and now we are finally realizing that without a moral populous to fill those benches the courts are what progressives have wanted them to be for 100 years, a third branch of government. I’m just glad we’re finally owning up to it. The courts are broken and I have not respect for what they have become.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5j05Ha2UqY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQYlygU9Cxc

  6. John Casper says:

    Patrick,

    If you were a conservative, you would have capitalized “Republic.”

    Sorry you missed this, “I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

    Conservatives and liberals agree that we need one set of laws; not what Judge Screnock stands for, a separate justice for the elites, Foxconn, …..

  7. Troll says:

    Most of the world would be condemned by the left. Women in India not on the pill, cave women. A Muslim man that believes a man and woman define marriage. Backwards. A majority of white women voted for Trump must hate themselves. If a Taiwanese company builds technology assuring Wisconsinites high paying jobs over rural cornfields they must be against clean water and air.

  8. John Casper says:

    Troll,

    “Most of the world” is not a U.S. citizen.

    1. How is “women in India not on the pill” different from other women in the world “not on the pill.”

    2. Are your “cave women” only in India?

    2.1 Are they “on the pill?”

    3. Do you have to be a Muslim man to define marriage?

    4. There’s another Taiwanese company–besides Foxconn–coming to Wisconsin?

  9. Ed says:

    Good article and well written. Curious why this story is not being covered by the main Madison and Milwaukee newspapers.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us