Intersection
North and Farwell
It’s already quite vibrant, but changes like turning Prospect and Farwell into two-way streets could improve it.
Get a daily rundown of the top stories on Urban Milwaukee
It’s already quite vibrant, but changes like turning Prospect and Farwell into two-way streets could improve it. Back to the full article.
Photos - Page 2
I also live in the neighborhood and I find it uncomfortable walking around that area in the evenings as well. The litter is awful and smokers feel they have the right to flick their butts anywhere. There are thousands of cigarette butts all over the place and the bars really don’t bother sweeping up outside their establishments. For an area that has a lot going on, its strangely creepy. However, I do like the farmer’s market. I’m afraid most adults are just avoiding the neighborhood.
I don’t think the city will make Farewell or Prospect two way anytime soon because they plan on running the streetcar down those streets. I think a speed buffer would make sense. All speeds should not exceed 25mph within a certain zone…. and it needs to be enforced. Farwell, Prospect and North are freeways and one of every 20-30 cars actually stop at the crosswalk in front of Beans. Its not enforced. Each year a new crop of texting addicted 18 year olds from Two Rivers or wherever has to learn to watch out for pedestrians. There is a learning curve. It’s just a matter of time until someone is killed (again).
Hopefully the city will look at the entire Prospect/Farwell corridor from downtown north near UWM. This ought to be a corridor where transit service (whether bus or rail or both) has some sort of priority treatment, but given the city’s seeming unwillingness to take steps within its control to improve transit service I don’t have much confidence that this will happen.
The intersection (and others nearby) ought to be narrowed as much as possible to encourage drivers to slow, or better yet stop, when making turns and to shorten the distance pedestrians have to cross streets. Curb extensions (neck downs) ought to be standard practice at intersections and bus bulbs should be added along major bus routes. Essentially the design of the street should serve to enforce pedestrian priority.
The pedestrian only walk signal would be excellent for this intersection, even if it only occurs during certain evening hours on the weekend where there are tons of pedestrians moving from bar to bar, possibly intoxicated. They could add another diagonal crosswalk as well so that pedestrians could, for example, walk from the Von Trier corner to the G-Daddy’s corner.
I don’t see the traffic issue being solved however, or at the very least being solved in a manner that balances all parties. Farwell, Prospect, and North are all major thoroughfares where a lot of commuters travel in the morning and evenings. North Avenue, especially, can get laughably backed up after work as it’s the main access point to the area from I-43. Every time I’ve headed in that direction after work there are a lot of cars that utilize the parking/bike lanes to facilitate their travel down North because of the congestion. Efforts to further restrict vehicular movements aren’t likely to be met with open arms from those who use cars in the neighborhood. Same with those who travel from the upper east side south toward downtown.
What would be cool is if there was some sort of active system that could alter the configuration of the streets/intersections based on need. I can’t think of a solution that isn’t overly complicated/expensive but something that restricted vehicular traffic at night and on the weekends (in the process making the street more pedestrian friendly) but opened up during rush hour or special events like the fireworks.
When Farwell and Prospect were two way streets, it was a different eastside. First, there were many fewer cars. Parking on the street was a possibility. Second, at that time, you had the post office delivering virtually everything, and usually on foot. Now during the day you can have 3 or 4 post office trucks in a 3 block area. Add in two types of FEDEX trucks, UPS and various other delivery and moving companies you have a lot more vehicles stopping in traffic. Even without a street car, two way traffic would be bunged up many hours each day, unless all parking were prohibited. Can’t see that happening. Third, when the streets were two way, there were many more homes that maybe had maybe one car, now they have been replaced with apartment buildings and many of those were built before they were required to have sufficient parking for their residents. Also competing for space with the parkers are the underutilized bike lanes. It seems most of the bikes run on the sideWALKS, and seem to try to run down the 90 year old residents of the Jewish Home and St. John’s. Sorry runners and bicyclists, but the best place for a street car or higher speed buses is the bike path which used to be railroad right-of-way. Leave Prospect and Farwell one way.
Traffic and behavior in the North Avenue triangle area are just fine. It’s gradually become more densely populated, so a little more like a near downtown Chicago neighborhood than the hub of our lower east side has been over the past fifty years, but North Avenue east of the river is a near downtown neighborhood, so it’s not surprising that a variety of activities take place in a single area. (It’s not a suburb where residential and commercial / retail / entertainment areas are located somewhat more apart from each other.) The triangle has always been the center of one of the best neighborhoods in the City of Milwuakee because it’s got so much going on, and sometimes, so many people, together in one place. Full of life, rough edges and all. Folks want to live someplace it’s a little quieter, a little less raucus in the evening hours, there are plenty of options like that within short walking distance of the North Avenue triangle. Or further away for those offended by city life.
Thanks for the advice Neal. We live in the area because we do like it. That doesn’t mean it can’t be improved. The Eastside bid should be more proactive and property owners should be more accountable. That being said, if the city wants to make the area safer for pedestrians they should enforce the laws or don’t have them. Thanks for the lesson though.
I lived at 2345 N. Cramer for years, right across from the old East Library’s parking lot. I love and miss that area, though it’s changed a lot since then. Being so close to Blockbuster, the Oriental, Alterra, Beans & Barley, those were good times. I have never been much of a night owl and my only beef was how loud it got on weekends. Basically every Friday and Saturday night you were going to be kept up by loud drunks. That was annoying, but the amenities of that area far outweighed that annoyance.
For traffic, the biggest problem is improper lane usage. One commenter noted how parking lanes were used to keep traffic moving. Yes, we should encourage traffic moving at a neighborhood appropriate speed, but that doesn’t mean we should back up 25 cars so one can turn left (don’t forget there are 25 cars going the other way that prevent the turn). This doesn’t “slow” traffic, it stops it and causes more bad behavior. Control the left turns or provide space for them and define what the remaining spaces are supposed to be used for — like the bus stop lane at Oakland/North is not for cars continuing east on North to turn on Ivanhoe.
Having all the lights turn red sounds a lot like a pedestrian scramble (All lights red, and a pedestrian walk sign for a diagonal crossing). I used one in Chicago – it might be a good fit at that intersection.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-05-31/news/chi-loop-intersection-to-test-pedestrian-scramble-20130530_1_crash-related-pedestrian-injuries-klein-jackson-boulevard