Marriott setback lifted by council committee
Bauman was referring to developers with Wave Development LLC and Jackson Street Management LLC, who appealed the Historic Preservation Committee’s setback condition to push the top three floors of the proposed Marriott Hotel tower on Milwaukee Street back from the property line 15 feet.
Wave partner Mark Flaherty said the condition was a “deal breaker and job killer.”
That afternoon, the committee voted 3-2 to remove the condition. Alderpersons Bauman and Tony Zielinski voted against the measure.
Common Council President Willie Hines said the decision was the right one, while praising the work of the HPC and Bauman to make the project better.
“But a $50 million development will go along way to create jobs, a tax base and eliminate blight,” he said.
Doug Nysse, the project architect, explained that the setback would reduce the number of hotel rooms available from 200 to 176, a 12 percent reduction in potential revenues. He added to maintain the room count, two floors would have to be added to the tower, increasing the mass and size of the building.
David Uihlein, an architect and owner of the McGeough Building located just south of the proposed development, had initially suggested the 15 foot setback and came to Thursday’s meeting with full drawings of how it could work. He told the ZND committee that, in his professional opinion, his drawing could meet the conditions set by the HPC.
But other architects and contractors rebuffed Uihlein’s opinion, saying the setback would cost the investors an additional $2.4 – $4 million.
“It is easy to draw something and prove it works, but then he doesn’t have to pay for it,” said Dennis Klein, owner of KBS Construction .
Thursday’s meeting included discussion that was previously blocked — specifically, the economic impact of the project. At least 30 members of the Service Employees International Union filled the hearing room, waving placards that read “We Need Good Jobs Now.” Others testified that the committee couldn’t afford to pass this project by, which could provide 350-450 construction jobs and 200 hotel positions.
But historical preservationists argued that restoration and preservation would provide more jobs and economic benefits than new construction.
“It is unfair to pit preservation against jobs,” said Anna-Marie Opgenorth, Executive Director of Historic Milwaukee.
“Preservation creates more jobs, more economic activity and more value. I support the project, but I do not support the disregard for the historic and economic value of these buildings and the Historical Preservation Commission. Any demolition will destroy the wealth in these historic buildings. I suggest all of you get educated to the real value of these buildings.”
After all of the talk, the majority of the committee seemed to feel the economic impact of a Marriott Hotel in downtown Milwaukee was, indeed, too great to pass by.
The vote didn’t surprise Opgenorth, but she is not deterred.
“I will continue to make sure our point of view is out there and that people know the benefits of historic preservation. That it keeps more money in Milwaukee and increases the value of new construction.”
There will be one more crack at this issue at next Wednesday’s Common Council meeting, where a supermajority of 10 members will be needed to pass the proposal.