Bruce Murphy
Murphy’s Law

19 Election Winners and Losers

Beyond the candidates, behind the scenes. who won, who lost?

By - Aug 10th, 2016 10:56 am
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
Paul Ryan and Donald Trump.

Paul Ryan and Donald Trump.

As it turns out, it was a ho-hum election which largely reelected incumbents. Yet there was a lot of drama to the election, and a lot of backstage winners and losers.

The saddest election result was surely in the 16th Assembly District, where incumbent Democrat Leon Young won yet again. It was back in 1992 that then-Rep. Marcia Coggs quietly let Young, her nephew, know she wouldn’t run, but she didn’t announce this until just a few hours before nomination papers were due. Young, of course, was the only to file for the seat and has served ever since. (The legislature later passed a law to prevent this from ever happening again.) Young has been a disgrace, repeatedly winning a designation as one of the state’s laziest and worst legislators from Milwaukee Magazine, with Capitol insiders calling him “a total waste of space,” “a complete joke,” and someone who “needs to get a different job.”

Attorney and Taiwanese-American Edgar Lin, a public defender who represents many people from Young’s impoverished district, felt its residents needed better representation. He worked hard going door-to-door, won lots of endorsements, and placed a strong second in a four-person race. But still a loss, alas.

Among the many other winners and losers:

Eric O’Keefe

Eric O’Keefe

Loser: Craig Peterson. The Republican PR man and his main funder, conservative Wisconsin Club for Growth leader Eric O’Keefe, had been targeting Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm for at least two years, beginning with a threatened effort to recall him from office. and including lawsuits by O’Keefe against the DA. O’Keefe and company spent as much as $300,000 in this race, some have estimated, and lost big. Chisholm carried 65 percent of the vote.

Loser: Erotic poets. The fact that Peterson’s candidate, Verona Swanigan, had represented a slum landlord was bad enough (it probably didn’t help her in the black community, where the African American candidate might have been expected to do well), but the news that she had authored a steamy book of erotic poetry badly cut into her credibility and has now ruined it for all future candidates tempted to author such books.

Winner: Jeff Wagner. Unlike his colleague Charlie Sykes, who declared Swanigan unqualified but disingenuously declared he would vote for her anyway as a protest against Chisholm, Wagner did the unexpected and announced his support for the DA. It buttressed the conservative talk radio host’s credentials as someone with a background in criminal justice who knows and cares about that turf.

Loser: Eric O’Keefe. Weirdly, the campaign against Chisholm included a robo-call from O’Keefe asking us to vote against the DA because he threatened “freedom of speech.” I’m guessing 98 percent of those getting the call had no idea who O’Keefe, a Sauk County resident, was. And most probably had no idea how a DA could threaten freedom of speech. Mostly the robo-call seemed like an ego trip.

Loser: Donald Trump. The reckless Republican presidential candidate announced he was backing Congressman Paul Ryan’s opponent Paul Nehlen in the GOP primary, and then relented a few days later. If anything, this probably helped Ryan, who ran up a nearly 6-to-1 edge in the election. Trump undoubtedly left Wisconsin Republicans even less likely to support him in November.

Winner: Ashanti Hamilton. The alderman and Common Council president has been allied with Peterson, but broke ranks to back Chisholm. That will help him with Democratic party leaders if, as expected, he runs for mayor in 2020.

Loser: Sarah Palin. If Palin ever had clout, that has steadily diminished, what with her incoherent speech endorsing Trump back in January. Her support for Nehlen, considering how badly he lost, gives Palin even less credibility.

Winner: Retail politics. For all the dark money spent by O’Keefe’s group and the liberal Greater Wisconsin Political Fund, which backed Chisholm, this was a pretty low-turnout affair that didn’t seem to be driven by ads. Chisholm’s operation was so under-powered he had family members delivering campaign signs. And Peterson was all over Facebook touting his candidate, even getting in a debate with my wife on her Facebook page. Now that’s retail politics.

Winner and Loser: Competitive primaries. For the first time since 1950, the majority of the state’s incumbent congressional representatives faced primary opponents. That’s remarkable. And in Milwaukee there were many challenges to incumbent Democratic legislators. On the other hand, all the incumbents won.

Mandela Barnes

Mandela Barnes

Loser: Democratic uber liberals. Two candidates challenged Democratic incumbents from the left: Mandela Barnes against state Sen. Lena Taylor and Julie Meyer against Rep. Christine Sinicki. Both lost. And in the 11th Assembly District, an open seat, the more liberal candidate, Darrol Gibson, lost to Jason Fields. Fields had been defeated by a challenger from the left, Mandela Barnes, in 2012, and how has been restored to office.

Winner: School Choice. Both Tayior and Fields support school choice and charter schools and won. This may have also been a victory for Peterson, who I suspect was working with the dark money group, Leaders for a Better Community, which backed the two candidates.

Loser: Latino community. Marisabel Cabrera ran a strong race against incumbent Josh Zepnick and lost in a squeaker. Zepnick looked fatally weakened by a drunk driving citation and his failure to even take second place in a bid to defeat Ald. Bob Donovan and all the signs pointed to Latinos winning a second assembly seat in Milwaukee. But it was not to be.

Winner: Chris Abele. He backed Fields and Taylor and Chisholm, all winners, and is presumed to have supplied some of the funding for the Greater Wisconsin ads for the DA. His one loss was the effort by his former aide Thomas Harris for the open seat in the 6th Senate District, easily won by state Rep. LaTonya Johnson.

Loser: Chris Larson. The Democratic state senator had in the past been successful backing Democratic upstarts challenging incumbent or more well-known Democrats from the left. Not this time, as Barnes, Gibson and Cabrera all lost.

Loser: David Clarke. The sheriff had in the past gotten headlines attacking Chisholm, only to get crushed by the DA’s response.  He followed up with ads backing Swanigan, only to see his candidate get crushed.

Winner: Scott Walker. His former advisor Mike Gallagher easily won the 8th Congressional District GOP primary. He will now face Democrat Tom Nelson, the Outagamie County Executive, in what is likely to be a hard-fought, closely watched general election.

Loser: Scott Walker. There’s no evidence he was backing Swanigan, but Chisholm’s victory means he can continue to pursue his filing with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking it to overrule the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision shutting down the John Doe probe of Walker, O’Keefe and others. Should Chisholm win that case it would be very bad news for the two conservatives.

Loser: Shepherd Express. The alt-weekly endorsed Meyer, Barnes, Gibson and Lin and Cabrera. All five lost. By comparison, Sarah Palin has clout.

Loser: Electoral cynicism. Was there ever a less serious candidate than Swanigan? She blew off the debate with Chisholm, skipped their announced appearance at the Community Brainstorming Conference and largely evaded any interview requests from the media. Meanwhile the ads supporting her made the most transparently inaccurate claims.  Sometimes politics works just like we learned in the civics textbooks.

Categories: Murphy's Law, Politics

7 thoughts on “Murphy’s Law: 19 Election Winners and Losers”

  1. Vincent Hanna says:

    Do Peterson’s rich friends care that he hardly ever wins? Results are beside the point?

  2. Milwaukee Native says:

    Winner & Loser: Shepherd Express. They endorsed a total of 13 candidates; seven won and six lost. The latter included Julie Meyer, the only one that raised hackles since Christine Sinicki has been a long-time progressive. http://shepherdexpress.com/news

    The Shepherd’s winners were Assembly candidates David Crowley, JoCasta Zamarripa and Jack Redmond; LaTonya Johnson for state Senate, DA John Chisholm and of course Gwen Moore and Russ Feingold. One would expect a progressive weekly to back progressive candidates. Endorsements are not a betting sport.

    The Wisconsin Gazette, another progressive paper, endorsed six candidates: Chisholm, Barnes, Johnson, Crowley, Cabrera and Lin. Those all overlapped with the Shepherd (making them 3 for 6).

    BTW, uber-liberal and long-time activist David Crowley was one of the biggest winners with nearly 60% in a a three-way race with big turnout.

  3. Jason says:

    I wonder how much money was spent by Democrats in the Lena Taylor/Mandela Barnes race and the Jason Fields/Darroll Gibson race based on the mailings I received it seemed a lot of money was spent by Democratic interests against our girl Lena. Fields is an upgrade over Mandela..

  4. Jake formerly of the LP says:

    Big loser- Scott Walker and the Wisconsin GOP. Not only are the polls showing the Dems up double digits for president and Senate (which makes it very possible for both the Senate and Assembly to flip, if you do the math), but Chisholm’s huge win is a major loss for O’Keefe, Peterson, and the oligarchs they front for. And it sets up a nice little October surprise when SCOTUS laughs at the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and John Doe is reopened.

    Why do you think the righties have been so desperate to take down Chisholm? They know what’s in those docs, and they know they’re sunk once the money train is revealed.

  5. Pete Mingle says:

    “Winners and Losers” post-election analysis has to be the easiest, most obvious and fluffffffiest sort of writing any serious journalist would put their name on. Sure, one can take a snarky slant on an election, while maintaining “objectivity.” But, really, who cares what the uninvolved (including even me, Pete Mingle—public big mouth) have to say AFTER an election. And, true to form, there wasn’t enough insight in the above offering. The yawns are evident from the dearth of comments.

    However, political wonks might be interested in learning from data analysis if Lena Taylor’s state Senate seat was perhaps saved by bored cross-over Republicans (there were almost no Republican contests in the suburban portion of Taylor’s district). Just who all voted in the Democratic race between Senator Taylor and the more progressive Representative Mandela Barnes? It would be a perverse form of “election fraud” if Republicans helped keep the always-opportunistic Democrat in the State Senate.

    Most glaring in Bruce Murphy’s analysis was the jab at the Shepherd Express for being involved in the democratic process by making endorsements, a hallowed newspaper tradition. (Fact: 7 of their 13 picks won.)

    These are pivotal, tumultuous times in Milwaukee. Just what does Urban Milwaukee now stand for locally? Of course, UM contributes by stoking the marketplace of ideas and keep an eye on right-wing mischief. But could it engage more directly on central-city issues?

    Bear in mind, I’m no great defender of the Shepherd Express during the Lou Fortis ownership era. The topics they report on are too predictable. Too much fawning of Mayor Barrett. Too much vilifying of a very deserving target in County Executive Chris Abele. This all reduces its “must-read” cachet.

    Urban Milwaukee would better burnish its image by more often taking principled positions or deeply analyzing tough issues of the day–rather than carping from the sidelines. The willingness of the Shepherd Express to wade into political waters doesn’t make that publication a “loser.”

  6. Matt says:

    We always whine about money in politics but then a bona fide jackass drops a ton of money (or perhaps the money of his moron friend’s) and he’s a loser because of a ironically and some dumb lady’s erotic poetry? Perhaps. But also a loser because now we are all ever more aware of what a cartoon character Mr. O’Keefe is. Like a drunk in a strip club, just tell him what he wants to hear and he’ll throw money at you. Congrats to Attorney Swanigan on developing the name recognition to parlay O’Keefe’s money into a prestigious gig on some third rate Republican speaking circuit.

  7. Bill Kurtz says:

    Pete, Lena wasn’t saved by suburbanites. According to North Shore NOW, she got just 18 percent in Shorewood and 39 percent in Glendale. Rather, let’s credit the alliance between black separatists and voucher supporters, with perhaps an assist from the NRA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *