Wauwatosa School Board Member Settles Meetings Case
Six-figure settlement covers meetings and First Amendment retaliation claims
Wauwatosa School Board member Michael Meier has settled his Milwaukee County Circuit Court Wisconsin Open Meetings Law case against the Wauwatosa School Board for $132,500, according to one of his attorneys, Ben Hitchcock Cross of Cross Law Firm, a Wisconsin civil rights and employment lawyer. The settlement also resolves claims that the Board retaliated against him for speaking publicly about complaints he had received from parents and record requests he had fulfilled.
Meier, who in 2023 won a Whistleblower OPEE award from the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, said “Good schools depend on good governance, and good governance depends on following the Wisconsin Open Meetings Law. I hope that my lawsuit gives other school board members the tools they need to hold their fellow board members accountable to the citizens with transparent processes.” Meier’s other attorney, Tom Kamenick, who specializes in public records and open meetings and runs the Wisconsin Transparency Project, said: “the dollar amount in this case speaks volumes about how seriously districts should take the open meetings law.” Kamenick added: “Lawsuits are sometimes necessary to remind school boards of the importance of transparency. Members like Mr. Meier who are willing to stand up and object when laws are being broken are vital to accountability.”
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Wisconsin Transparency Project
Wisconsin Examiner Sues Wauwatosa PD for Records
Dec 14th, 2023 by Wisconsin Transparency ProjectChallenges department's lengthy delays and high fees
Court of Appeals Requires School District to Produce Email Distribution Lists
Dec 7th, 2022 by Wisconsin Transparency ProjectGovernment can't spread ideological message and deny the public access to the same audience