HISTORIC DECISION: Wisconsin Federal Court Strikes Down Partisan Gerrymander and Adopts Groundbreaking Legal Standard
Litigators and lead plaintiff react to historic decision
With this decision, plaintiffs have successfully alleged and proven that a state legislative redistricting plan is an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander for the first time ever.
The Campaign Legal Center (CLC) along with regional local counsel represent lead plaintiff Bill Whitford and the other 11 plaintiffs in the case.
CLC Director of Voting Rights and Redistricting Program Gerry Hebert released the following statement:
Peter Earle, one of the Wisconsin-based attorneys representing the plaintiffs, released the following statement:
“Today is a historic day and I am thrilled with the result not only for our plaintiffs, but for all Wisconsin voters. This decision will finally give voters in Wisconsin the power they deserve to shape their democracy. Now a fairer system will be created here in Wisconsin so all voters, not just a select few, will be able to have their voices heard.”
Bill Whitford, the lead plaintiff in the case, released the following statement:
“I’m very pleased with this decision. It is truly historic. As a lifelong Democrat the court’s decision recognizes the power of my voice and the voices of all other Democrats across the state. This decision could have a monumental impact in ensuring that voters’ voices are heard across the nation, regardless of party. I want fair elections, where the voters have the power, not a gerrymander for either side created by self-interested politicians. That’s what today’s decision is all about.”
The ruling issued today by the court stated the following:
“We find that Act 43 was intended to burden the representational rights of Democratic voters throughout the decennial period by impeding their ability to translate their votes into legislative seats. Moreover, as demonstrated by the results of the 2012 and 2014 elections, among other evidence, we conclude that Act 43 has had its intended effect.”
The parties have 30 days to submit their proposals for the nature and timing of the remedial process. The plaintiffs’ three-part test, which was adopted in this case, can now be used across the country to fight back against unfair partisan gerrymandering.
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
More about the Gerrymandering of Legislative Districts
- Without Gerrymander, Democrats Flip 14 Legislative Seats - Jack Kelly, Hallie Claflin and Matthew DeFour - Nov 8th, 2024
- Op Ed: Democrats Optimistic About New Voting Maps - Ruth Conniff - Feb 27th, 2024
- The State of Politics: Parties Seek New Candidates in New Districts - Steven Walters - Feb 26th, 2024
- Rep. Myers Issues Statement Regarding Fair Legislative Maps - State Rep. LaKeshia Myers - Feb 19th, 2024
- Statement on Legislative Maps Being Signed into Law - Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos - Feb 19th, 2024
- Pocan Reacts to Newly Signed Wisconsin Legislative Maps - U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan - Feb 19th, 2024
- Evers Signs Legislative Maps Into Law, Ending Court Fight - Rich Kremer - Feb 19th, 2024
- Senator Hesselbein Statement: After More than a Decade of Political Gerrymanders, Fair Maps are Signed into Law in Wisconsin - Dianne Hesselbein - Feb 19th, 2024
- Wisconsin Democrats on Enactment of New Legislative Maps - Democratic Party of Wisconsin - Feb 19th, 2024
- Governor Evers Signs New Legislative Maps to Replace Unconstitutional GOP Maps - A Better Wisconsin Together - Feb 19th, 2024
Read more about Gerrymandering of Legislative Districts here
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Campaign Legal Center
Amended Whitford Complaint Highlights Harm Caused by Wisconsin’s Partisan Gerrymander to 40 Plaintiffs Across 34 Districts
Sep 14th, 2018 by Campaign Legal CenterIt's time for the courts to stop hesitating and start protecting the fundamental right to vote from the harms of gerrymandering
Supreme Court Will Hear Oral Arguments In Landmark Partisan Gerrymandering Case, Gill v. Whitford
Jun 19th, 2017 by Campaign Legal CenterWisconsin’s partisan gerrymander is one of the most extremely gerrymandered state legislative plans in the last four decades.
Legendary SCOTUS Litigator Paul M. Smith Joins Whitford v. Gill Legal Team
Jan 5th, 2017 by Campaign Legal CenterResponse Brief on Remedies is Submitted Today to Federal District Court
Gerrymandering is a real thing, and this legal decision is a good example of revealing that. Some GOP actors will undoubtedly claim that everyone does it and this is not really gerrymandering. They will be largely wrong in both statements. First of all, both parties have engaged in gerrymandering all over the US, but Wisconsin has not been as bad as some states. The current apportionment of voting districts is among the worst examples out there.
The message that should come out of this is: Don’t do it.
No matter what party or individuals push for corruptly influencing the voting process, they should be shouted down. Every time.
It kind of misleading to say “both parties have engaged in gerrymandering all over the US.” While you can certainly find examples here and there of democratic gerrymandering, republican gerrymandering is the rule rather than the exception, at least in 2010, and Wisconsin is far from the most egregious.
Take a look at a sorted list:
http://autoredistrict.org/all50/version3/CD_PRES/sortable_2010.php
sort the list by packing / cracking. dark blue = republican gerrymandering (dem votes packed), dark red = democratic gerrymandering (rep votes packed)
so you see it’s mountains and molehills. not comparable.
Kevin: I agree that it is not comparable. However, the practice is a bad one. Clearly, if we encourage rolling back gerrymandering on principle, we will accomplish practical and ethical improvement.