Law Forward

Justice Ziegler Misquotes US Supreme Court Decision

Conservative falsely claims state courts can’t review congressional maps.

With Gerrymandering Lawsuits In Hands of Judges, What Happens Next?

This will be the first time the state has used judicial panels to consider redistricting lawsuits.

Should Wisconsin Allow Fusion Voting?

A movement to allow major and minor parties to back the same candidate.

Can New Legal Challenge Reshape State’s Congressional Districts?

Can more competitive districts be created and what would they look like?

Liberal Firms Urge Wisconsin Supreme Court To Advance Redistricting Lawsuit

Lawyers for Republicans say Protasiewicz and Crawford should recuse.

Russ Feingold Files Brief Against Republican Effort to Weaken Campaign Finance Laws

Feingold, who crafted campaign finance regulations, is joined by liberal law firm.

Law Forward Applauds Wisconsin Supreme Court Orders, Ready to Litigate Congressional Districts

Presidents Pardons Encourage Those Working to Undermine Elections, Do Not Affect Ongoing State Prosecutions, including in Wisconsin

Law Forward urges Supreme Court to accept amicus brief calling for revocation of Michael Gablemans law license

As the state Supreme Court considers disciplinary action against Gableman, Law Forward continues pushing for additional accountability

Law Forward Files Brief in Wisconsin Supreme Court Arguing Congressional Map Challenge Should Advance to a Three-Judge Panel

Law Forward advances a challenge to Wisconsin’s gerrymandered congressional maps on behalf of business leaders and voters, arguing they represent an anti-competitive gerrymander

Former Senator Russ Feingold and Law Forward filing amicus brief warning U.S. Supreme Court against dismantling campaign finance protections

Brief highlights Wisconsin's deregulated campaign finance system as cautionary tale of corruption and unlimited money in elections

Law Forward Responds to Elon Musk’s Delay Tactics in Wisconsin Alleged Voter Bribery Case

Filings argue that defendants' motions are meritless attempts to delay this important case and avoid accountability