Wisconsin Supreme Court Protects Privacy and Rights of Voters Under Guardianship
Court rejects right-wing effort to obtain confidential guardianship records and restrict voting rights for Wisconsin seniors and those with disabilities
MADISON, Wis. — The Wisconsin Supreme Court today ruled in Wisconsin Voter Alliance v. Kristina Secord to protect the privacy and voting rights of Wisconsinites under guardianship, rejecting politicized attempts to obtain confidential records about some of the state’s most vulnerable residents. Law Forward previously filed an amicus brief in the case on behalf of Disability Rights Wisconsin and the Greater Wisconsin Agency on Aging Resources.
Law Forward‘s brief argued that individuals under guardianship retain their right to vote unless a court makes an individualized, evidence-based finding to the contrary. Wisconsin law expressly requires records on these proceedings—and even the fact that someone is under guardianship—to be kept strictly confidential to protect people with disabilities and older Wisconsinites from exploitation, stigma, and discrimination.
“Like all Wisconsinites, individuals under guardianship deserve dignity and respect,” said Law Forward Legal Fellow Taylor Gilbertson. “It should go without saying that any effort to reveal their private voting records would risk a profound injustice. The Court was right to protect them.”
The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed that Wisconsin values the privacy and confidentiality of proceedings for people under guardianship. The majority held that Notice of Voting Eligibility forms are pertinent to guardianship determinations and are a closed record under Wisconsin statute, meaning these forms cannot be produced under public records requests.
Read the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s ruling here.
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Law Forward
Law Forward and Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School Ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to Send Congressional Anti-Competitive Gerrymandering Case Back
Aug 21st, 2026 by Law ForwardAhead of September 16th oral arguments in the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the brief outlines how current maps unconstitutionally protect incumbent members of Congress and how Wisconsin courts can assess competitiveness of maps
Law Forward and Bloc Urge Supreme Court of Wisconsin to Empower Courts to Stem Disenfranchisement
Aug 19th, 2026 by Law ForwardAmicus brief argues Court of Appeals wrongly ignored the right to vote enshrined in the Wisconsin Constitution and improperly limited courts' power to extend voting hours
Federal Ruling Halts Trump Administration’s Proposed Restrictions on Mail-in Ballots
Aug 11th, 2026 by Law ForwardFederal judge in Boston issued a nationwide injunction putting a stop to USPS proposed rules that would restrict mail-in voting
