Bruce Murphy
Murphy’s Law

Was Jonathan Brostoff Bullied?

Some Democrats point finger at Shepherd Express, others for Brostoff’s suicide.

By - Nov 12th, 2024 12:08 pm
State Rep. Jonathan Brostoff (D-Milwaukee) at a press conference on restoring public school funding and phasing out the state voucher program. Photo courtesy of Rep. Brostoff’s office.

State Rep. Jonathan Brostoff (D-Milwaukee) at a press conference on restoring public school funding and phasing out the state voucher program. File photo courtesy of Rep. Brostoff’s office.

In the aftermath of Milwaukee Alderman Jonathan Brostoff’s suicide there has been great sadness and discussion as to why it happened and how it might have been avoided. That includes finger pointing by people seeking simple answers which has caused a controversy to erupt.

Attorney and Wisconsin Elections Commission member Ann Jacobs is a strongly pro-Israel Democrat who put up a Facebook post last week slamming the Shepherd Express. She noted that on Sunday night, the day before Brostoff committed suicide, the Shepherd posted its Best of Milwaukee nomination, which listed Brostoff as one of the four “most despised politicians” in the state along with Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, US Senator Ron Johnson and state Rep. Bob Donovan. It was printed on page 36 of its latest print publication.

The inclusion of Brostoff was shocking, given that the Shepherd has always been a liberal publication that supports Democrats. Jacobs claimed this was part of a campaign of criticism of Brostoff “for his support for Israel” by people engaging in “anti-semitism.”

“There were many others who fomented this who today are suddenly bereft (at Brostoff’s death), refusing to acknowledge the hate they participated in,” Jacobs charged.

This prompted a hailstorm of comments from people responding to Jacobs’ post, calling the Shepherd “vile” and “despicable” for its attack on Brostoff, with Milwaukee County supervisor Shawn Rolland calling it “absolutely terrible.” Other politicians who criticized the publication included Democratic legislators Chris Sinicki and Kelda Roys.

Even Vos piled on, though with a slightly different take: “How about saying no one in elected office, regardless of party, should be despised?… It’s hateful rhetoric against any elected official that fuels the rise of things like antisemitism, sexism, etc.?”

Not long after this criticism on Facebook, the Shepherd took down the entire “most despised politician” category from its Best of Milwaukee finalists online, without explaining why it did so. That merely prompted more criticism. The Shepherd has been declining for years, slashing staff and editorial content while cutting back from a weekly to monthly publication. Its owner, publisher and editor is Louis Fortis, and as those titles suggest he has significant control over its editorial decisions. But the website does not list his email address and Fortis did not respond to a request for comment. On the same day I contacted him for comment, Fortis belatedly put up a column explaining the Shepherd’s decision making.

The Shepherd’s website does list an email for its longtime arts and entertainment editor, Dave Luhrssen, who now serves as managing editor and is listed as contact for “new tips.” Luhrssen has for decades been a loyal subordinate to Fortis, who is a former Democratic state legislator with strong views on politics and politicians. (Full disclosure: I worked as editor under Fortis for about six months and resigned rather than make changes to stories I objected to on editorial grounds.)

Luhrssen did respond to Urban Milwaukee, saying that “A group of readers were obviously very upset with Jonathan” and picked him, along with three Republicans as one of the state’s most despised politicians. How many readers? Luhrssen wouldn’t say.

As one comment on Facebook noted, “I can only think of a short list of people that participate in Shepherd Express stuff who would have even nominated him for that.”

And even if they had, Fortis could have simply cut Brostoff from the list. As one comment noted, “if, say, an openly trans person in politics were nominated for this list, Fortis almost certainly would have understood why they were nominated and killed the category.”

Victor Huyke, publisher of the El Conquistador Latino, offered a similar view, saying “Wow! I’m surprised Louis would let something like that run.”

As to why the Shepherd later decided to take down the most despised politician category, Luhrssen said “It was the right thing to do considering the fact that the world of politics has gotten so nasty.” But that’s been going on for years and in the case of Brostoff he was getting criticism going back months, those who know him have said.

Some observers connected the criticism of Brostoff to the late alderman’s opposition to the reelection of Socialist and Democrat Ryan Clancy. Brostoff was among a list of prominent Democrats who opposed Clancy, including Mayor Cavalier Johnson, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley and Milwaukee County Board Chair Marcelia Nicholson. Many Democrats criticized Clancy, saying he lacked a collaborative approach and was hated by many members of the party for his divisive style. Only 4 of 45 Democratic members of the Legislature endorsed Clancy, but he overcame the criticism and won reelection.

The Shepherd’s Best Of ballot seems laughably pro-Clancy: he is a finalist in five categories, including “Most Beloved Politician,” “Best Local Activist,” Milwaukeean of the Year,” “Best State Legislator” and “Most Trusted Politician.” The latter category is particularly ironic given criticism of Clancy on this score by some Democratic politicians. The results suggest an organized campaign by Clancy supporters in a low-vote election by a declining publication.

Some time after Jacobs’ post Clancy posted an item on Facebook to “address baseless accusations being thrown around. I am gutted and deeply sorry that Jonathan felt bullied and unsafe in our community. Public figure or not, bullying is wrong. I didn’t have a hand in that, nor did I see or encourage that in anyone else.”

Clancy and Brostoff were once good friends, and “I still loved and respected Jonathan for the tremendous work he did in our community,” Clancy wrote. Clancy’s FB page includes a photo with Brostoff. Yet he didn’t attend the memorial service for Brostoff. “I didn’t want my presence to interfere with anyone’s grief,” he told Urban Milwaukee. As for the accusation that much of the bullying Brostoff suffered was from Clancy’s supporters, Clancy says “I did not know anything about that.”

Even if the Shepherd and some of Clancy’s supporters were nasty or unfair to Brostoff, the claims that they — or antisemitism —  should be blamed for his death are absurdly simplistic, as Facebook comments often are. We will never fully know what precipitated his decision, but as Brostoff himself wrote, he suffered from mental health issues and suicidal thoughts as a teen. He knew how the decision to terminate one’s life comes “at your absolute lowest moment — when thoughts don’t make sense and when calm, structured thinking is no longer part of the equation.” I think he would have preferred that his supporters devote their energies not to seeking blame, but to advocating for gun control laws so that gun suicides like that by Brostoff are reduced.

That was a key message in a press release by County Supervisor and former state representative Sheldon Wasserman: “As we mourn Jonathan’s loss,” he wrote, “we must also address the urgent need to reevaluate firearm access. I believe extending the waiting period could help prevent firearms from being impulsively purchased and used in times of crisis. Wisconsin must carefully examine the strong connection between guns and suicide and take steps to address it.”

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Comments

  1. AttyDanAdams says:

    Well stated, Bruce.

  2. Gregg Mulry says:

    Thanks, Bruce, for covering the unfair criticism that Jonathan faced. One small request… Could we all stop saying “committed suicide?” People don’t commit cancer or heart disease. They die by or from such diseases. It’s a small change, but words matter. Thanks again

    ..

  3. lccfccoop2 says:

    Washerman nailed it . And so did you.

    I haven’t trusted the Shepherd for

  4. lccfccoop2 says:

    I meant “for years. And I hate what Israeli/Palestine dispute has done to lifelong friendships

  5. dmkrueger2 says:

    Tough topic, thanks for engaging us with the material.

    My favorite part was the “Full Disclosure”.

  6. Patricia Jursik says:

    Yikes! I am agreeing with Robin Vos? “How about saying no one in elected office, regardless of party, should be despised?… It’s hateful rhetoric against any elected official that fuels the rise of things like antisemitism, sexism, etc.?”

    Yet, nasty rhetoric has been with us since our constitution created voting, it is politics at its best and worst, and Vos, et.al. participated as much as any politician. Dearest Jonathan stayed true to his core values, this is what we should celebrate.

  7. domnoth@gmail.com says:

    Bruce, it’s a well done and thoughtful story. We may never know the root causes for Brostoff’s decision, but this was a particular outrageous moment. Dom

  8. rubiomon@gmail.com says:

    When does being called “most despised” qualify as calumny? Politicians, including Vos and Brostoff, choose public exposure and should have the skin to deal with criticism- and sarcasm. The Shepherd’s faux “Best Of” has been gimmicked and gamed by partisans for years. Atty. Jacob’s making this “anti-semitism” is absurd. And, Bruce, your snarky characterizations of one of your competitors is juvenile.

  9. mkwagner says:

    Just as someone suffering from COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) eventually succumb to the disease–they can no long take in enough oxygen to survive; Jonathan Brostoff succumb to the diseases he has fought since he was a teen. I saw interviews with friends of Jonathan who commented on his advocacy and support for the Milwaukee community he loved. The question might be how well did the Milwaukee community supported and advocated for him?

    Instead slipping into shame and blame, I suggest we look at our accountability. Accountability includes both atonement and forgiveness. It may very well have been that all the support and love Jonathan received was no longer enough. We should mourn how Jonathan Brostoff succumbed to his disease. Atonement offers us the opportunity to connect with, advocate for those–like Jonathan–whose pain is greater than their resources to ease or eliminate it. We can also enact policies that reduces the availability of guns to individuals like Jonathan,

    We have to forgive ourselves and those we want to blame for Jonathan’s death. Maybe Jonathan’s death can spur us on to dial back the hateful rhetoric–demonizing those we disagree with. These are the life lessons we need to learn from Jonathan’s death. This is no better way to honor Jonathan than to learn these lessons.

    Rest in peace Jonathan. We will follow in your footsteps to serve and support the community you loved.

  10. exlibris says:

    Thanks Bruce, for this enlightening article. I did not know The Shepherd had placed Jonathan Brostoff in a “most despised” category grouped with extremists such as R. Vos, R. Johnson, and B. Donovan. If anything, Jonathan tried to bridge divides–never easy–and tried his best to find workable solutions that benefitted the broadest range of his constituents. He always sought the high road, ethically and morally. He was much loved by his community. That makes his death all the more tragic.

  11. Trmott says:

    exlibis says he did not know “… The Shepherd had placed Jonathan Brostoff in a ‘most despised’ category grouped with extremists such as R. Vos, R. Johnson, and B. Donovan”.
    As he then added, Mr. Brostoff “tried his best to find workable solutions that benefitted the broadest range of his constituents.” Seems that’s what “successful” (those who get re-elected) politicians do, including Vos, Johnson, and Donovan. How can we suggest they could be most despised when they’re virtually< by definition, "less despised" in their venues than whomever opposes them. Maybe they're despised extremists in the minds of The Shepherd’s editorial staff and some of their readers, but that’s not the prevaling view of the relevant electorate, is it?

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us