DWD Wants A Modernized Unemployment System
Secretary was in "complete shock" the first time she saw the antiquated systems.
The state Department of Workforce Development (DWD) renewed calls Wednesday to modernize Wisconsin’s unemployment system, showing in great detail the facets of the agency’s computer system that slow down the pace of claims processing.
In a nearly hour-long briefing, department officials walked through the complicated and antiquated system used to process benefits, sharing screenshots of computer systems used by DWD staff that were reminiscent of early computers from a pre-internet era.
In the demonstration, officials showed how one relatively simple issue can drastically slow down an unemployment claim, creating multiple additional steps for DWD staff to finish processing. Multiple systems are used that the department described as not intuitive, creating a steep learning curve for new staff being brought on to deal with the massive spike in claims the department has seen throughout the pandemic.
The briefing comes as out-of-work Wisconsinites continue their weeks-long wait for two new sets of unemployment benefits. In the second round of federal coronavirus relief, Congress allowed unemployment recipients to claim an extra 11 weeks of benefits under two programs: Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) for self-employed and contract workers, and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC), which extends the amount of time someone can receive unemployment.
DWD officials said in a briefing before the state Senate Wednesday that they expect new PEUC benefits to be deployed in the first week of March. The department has not released a timeline for when PUA benefits will be available and has not responded to multiple requests for comment from Wisconsin Public Radio about when they’ll be finalized. Both sets of benefits were signed into law Dec. 27, meaning as of Wednesday, jobless Wisconsinites have been waiting a full month without aid.
That lack of information has angered many unemployment recipients, according to interviews and multiple posts on online unemployment support groups. Many recipients are dealing with increasing strain to their finances while they go without benefits.
DWD officials said the Evers administration began efforts to modernize the system in 2019, conducting demonstrations with potential vendors to see different visions for an updated system.
Through the process, DWD compiled a list of seven things that need to be done to update the unemployment system software. Those include things like providing near 24/7 customer service, enabling electronic communications for recipients and employers, automation of multiple processes that currently require manual work, and a system that allows for the ability to set up unemployment policy changes quickly and easily.
The department estimates that the upgrade could cost $90 million and take years to complete.
“Ultimately, this is the necessary solution to provide better, faster services to future claimants and improve the (unemployment) system’s ability to respond to future recessions,” Pechacek said.
Evers called the state Legislature into special session on Jan. 19 to modernize the unemployment system. Republican state lawmakers declined to take up any policy changes, instead saying Evers has the ability to update the system on his own.
In a statement to WPR, Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, again argued that Evers has the power to update the unemployment system himself.
“This morning’s briefing showed the very real need to modernize the unemployment insurance system and I hope the governor was watching,” Vos said. “His administration should get to work fixing this issue using any one of the available avenues outlined by the non-partisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau.”
Evers has argued the changes would require legislative action from state lawmakers.
Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu, R-Oostburg, did not respond to a request for comment.
DWD Renews Call To Modernize Wisconsin’s Unemployment System was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
The Republicans will fight to keep it as bad as possible.
So Vos’ solution is to vaguely point to some existing accounts with a total available balance of ~29mil? Can’t argue that that can’t get something started, but at what opportunity cost? Surely those monies aren’t just sitting there for nothing, ‘cuz if they were, they should’ve been refunded to the taxpayers a long time ago — well, I mean, at least that’s what they told me to say.
Having retired from many years of dealing with mainframe computer systems I offer the following. First of all, this system should have been upgraded to 24×7 online availability back in the 80’s. Second the front end user screens should have been redone on one of the many desktop platforms that were available in the early 2000’s to interface with mainframe data. The databases could have (and still today, should) remained on the mainframe computers, which is the most secure IT environment. Upgrades are a necessary part of IT systems, but they cost money. Both parties, and possibly dept. heads over the years, are responsible for this system being outdated. However even a newer system may have been overwhelmed by the sheer volume. My other problem with this whole thing has nothing to do with the computer system. Why do so many claims have to be adjudicated? Is it because of trying to stop possible fraud? Are we spending $100,000 to save $10,000? Can the process be streamlined?