Bruce Murphy
Murphy’s Law

Local Unions Confront The Wealthy

It's all about the wealth gap for workers at Colectivo and Milwaukee Art Museum.

By - Nov 30th, 2020 03:58 pm
Milwaukee Art Museum. Photo by Jeramey Jannene.

Milwaukee Art Museum. Photo by Jeramey Jannene.

The Milwaukee Art Museum has always been about wealth.

Its board of directors has always included many of the community’s wealthy people and is currently led by Quadgraphics CEO Joel Quadracci, who earned some $50 million over the last 10 years as CEO of Quadgraphics. Its collection of art has been built by many wealthy collectors, most famously by Frederick Layton and Peg Bradley, and the value of its collection is driven by what the wealthy will pay. And its budget depends on contributions from well-to-do philanthropists, who contribute millions every year to its support.

Perhaps no project in Milwaukee history raised more in private money (in excess of $130 million) than the museum’s internationally-known Calatrava addition. And yet the museum was able to go back to the philanthropic community since then, to support renovations and a new lakeside lobby with a price tag of $34 million. In between this there were concerted efforts to build the museum’s endowment, which is considerable. Its most recent federal income tax form lists $53 million in investments

But even as millions flowed in to support the museum, it continued to depend on low-paid employees, many of whom worked less than full-time, which helped reduce the cost of employee benefits. The idea was that this was for a good cause — art with a capital A — and folks in the arts had long worked for low wages.

And then came the pandemic, with the museum’s low-wage workers seeing layoffs and reductions in hours. Finally, they had enough.

In August workers announced they were seeking to form a union. “We want to change ‘take it or leave it’ pay, poor communication, and a culture of privilege,” a statement by the union’s organizers declared. “With a union contract we hope to achieve a fair and transparent disciplinary process and, perhaps most importantly, ensure MAM will not take advantage of employees’ vulnerability during the ongoing pandemic.“

The statement added that “The vast majority of the museum’s employees of color work in the lowest paid jobs and were disproportionately impacted by the museum’s furlough.”

The effort came in the wake of other art museums in the nation becoming unionized and is very much about the class divide, as Art Net noted: “Art is a field in which some of the world’s wealthiest people regularly interact with artists and workers hovering near the poverty line. Because of this wealth gap, and because art institutions regularly celebrate critiques of capitalism and power abuses in art while failing to engage with the concerns of their own low-paid employees, unionization feels like a critical culture shift.”

But the MAM situation also echoed labor unrest in Milwaukee’s private sector since the pandemic hit. Employees at Comet Cafe picketed and demanded severance, and workers who were fired by Strauss Meatpacking after complaining about the lack of COVID-19 safety measures picketed the plant in Franklin. Then came union organizing efforts at the museum and Colectivo cafes, which were opposed by management of both local institutions. Colectivo even hired a law firm accused of “union-busting” to try to defeat the effort.

Scott Schwebel, vice president of brand, marketing and retail for Colectivo, was quoted saying that its workers would not benefit from a union because “transient employment cafe jobs get little or nothing in return.”

The suggestion that Colectivo’s employees were “transient” workers did not go over well, says union organizer Hillary Laskonis. “It’s a talking point we’ve heard more than once from the ‘senior leadership team’ that has been brought up to me often by other employees who’ve been offended by it. I’ve been with the company for three years and many of my coworkers have been there for 3 or more years. They call us a transient work population and say we wouldn’t benefit from a union and then proudly share “Colectiv-ersaries” each month in the company newsletter and push for us to join the company’s 401k plan.”

Laskonis forwarded screen shots of the company’s recent monthly emails to employees celebrating anniversaries and there were workers who’d been with the company 20, 18,11 and seven years and many who’ve been employed three or more years.

The reality is that millions of Millennials are making their living in these so-called transient jobs. They make up 59% of all workers for bars, hold 49% of all restaurant and food service jobs, 45% of jobs at alcoholic-beverage wholesalers and 42% of jobs in beverage manufacturing. Treating them like kids biding their time until they get a real occupation is an easy way to justify the low pay. Or the fact that a barista or bartender position is sexier than a dull office job.

But the net result is that the owners of Colectivo get wealthy while workers can barely support themselves. It’s a classic example of America’s wealth gap, which continues to hollow out the middle class while growing the wealth of the top one percent. But in the case of service industry companies like Colectivo, it adds a generation gap as well: Millennials are the low-paid servants of well-to-do Baby Boomers.

The art museum, while it fits into this general pattern, is a very special case. None of its wealthy board members are paid a penny. In fact they are expected to donate to it. And the museum’s director Marcelle Polednik earns an annual compensation of $325,000, which is low for an institution of its size, with a budget of about $20 million.

But it’s worth noting that the museum is tax exempt: we are all subsidizing it. And in the last 30 years nonprofit executive salaries have risen at a stratospheric rate, imitating those of private sector CEOs and helping create a wealth gap in the non-profit sector as well.

Those low salaries and jobs without benefits at the art museum have kept the overall budget much lower, making it easier for its philanthropists, who would otherwise have had to donate and raise more money. But they will get plaques and honors and wings of the building named after them. The hundreds of employees who subsidized the museum over the years will simply be forgotten.

While Colectivo is still battling, the art museum has lost the war, as its employees voted to form a union. The management, I’m told, was very angry. It will certainly add another challenge for the museum. But if art is to reflect the good, the beautiful and the true, shouldn’t its treatment of employees be informed by the same mentality?

More about the Union Effort at Colectivo

Read more about Union Effort at Colectivo here

More about the Union Effort at the Milwaukee Art Museum

Read more about Union Effort at the Milwaukee Art Museum here

2 thoughts on “Murphy’s Law: Local Unions Confront The Wealthy”

  1. B says:

    Solidarity!

  2. Gordon Skare says:

    Does anyone know the status of the labor contract between Milwaukee County Public Museum and the AFSCME union representing the workers there?

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us