Schmidt Will Get $1 Million Pension
Acting Sheriff doesn’t deny it, refuses to say whether he will sign waiver of backdrop benefit.
Yesterday, I reported that Acting Sheriff Richard Schmidt was likely to get a county backdrop payment of somewhere between $596,000 and $834,000, depending on the details of his employment. Because I lacked the full information, I noted this was a crude estimate, but there was no doubt Schmidt would get a very generous payment, which is surely of interest to voters deciding whether to support him.
I’ve since been able to get Schmidt’s date of birth and annual salary for the years 2006 through 2009 from Milwaukee County, which answered my public information request by yesterday afternoon. So I was able to do a more precise estimate of the lump sum backdrop payment Schmidt is eligible to receive: $1,015,122
That would be one of the highest backdrop payments in county history.
Schmidt had not responded to my phone calls and emails asking him for information, but yesterday I was able to obtain his cell phone number, I called him to say I was writing about his pension. He said he had no time to talk now and quickly hung up.
About an hour later I called again and quickly told him my estimate that he was eligible for a $1 million backdrop when he retired.
Said Schmidt: “I have no intention of retiring.”
“So are you willing to sign a waiver of the backdrop benefit?” I asked.
“I have no intention of retiring,” Schmidt repeated. “I’m willing to keep working for the citizens of Milwaukee County.”
“But will you sign a waiver of the backdrop benefit,” I repeated.
“I have given you my answer,” Schmidt said. “I have nothing more to say. Now I’m about to go on a radio show and that’s all I have to say.”
At no point did Schmidt deny the $1 million figure or suggest I was wrong. And if he intends to never retire and therefore never claim the backdrop benefit, why not sign a waiver of it?
Schmidt had worked 22.5 years by February 2009, and would get 2 percent service credit for each year worked, meaning he would get 45 percent of his final average salary of about $99,000, or $44,550 per year for 13 years at 7.75 interest. That comes to a total of $1,015,122.
In addition to this, Schmidt would also receive a lifetime monthly pension totaling $44,550 per year.
As my earlier story noted, the county pension is quite complicated and there are some factors that might increase his pension beyond what I’ve computed, but as a ballpark estimate this is close to and probably less than what Schmidt could claim. If Schmidt is unwilling to sign a waiver of the benefit, this is one voter who would consider him disqualified for office.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.
More about the Milwaukee County Pension Scandal
- Back in the News: Actually, County Comptroller Could Get $1.3 Million Backdrop - Bruce Murphy - Jul 12th, 2023
- MKE County: Pension Backdrop Costs Hit $354 Million - Angeline Terry - Aug 16th, 2021
- Murphy’s Law: Mr Pension Scandal Wants Your Vote - Bruce Murphy - Jul 22nd, 2020
- Murphy’s Law: Schmidt’s Pension An Issue for Deputies - Bruce Murphy - Aug 13th, 2018
- Murphy’s Law: Schmidt Will Get $1 Million Pension - Bruce Murphy - Aug 2nd, 2018
- Murphy’s Law: Schmidt Pension At Issue In Sheriff Race? - Bruce Murphy - Aug 2nd, 2018
- The $400 Million Pension Problem - Mitchel Writt - Jun 6th, 2017
- Eyes on Milwaukee: Will County Give Pension to State? - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 23rd, 2017
- Murphy’s Law: Who’s To Blame for Pension Mess? - Bruce Murphy - Mar 7th, 2017
- Murphy’s Law: County Pension Scandal Poster Boys - Bruce Murphy - Mar 3rd, 2016
Read more about Milwaukee County Pension Scandal here
Murphy's Law
-
National Media Discovers Mayor Johnson
Jul 16th, 2024 by Bruce Murphy -
Milwaukee Arts Groups in Big Trouble
Jul 10th, 2024 by Bruce Murphy -
The Plague of Rising Health Care Costs
Jul 8th, 2024 by Bruce Murphy
I get that the backdrop was certainly a bone-headed and outrageous benefit. But why would you expect someone who has been promised that benefit and worked for it for decades to unilaterally give up what they are owed? Should all County employees voluntarily renounce their pay or just those who seek elected office?