Jeramey Jannene

Council Bounces Trampoline Rules

How much regulation is too much?

By - Jul 16th, 2025 09:39 am
Southside trampoline. Image provided by Peter Burgelis.

Southside trampoline. Image provided by Peter Burgelis.

Alderman Peter Burgelis‘s effort to place limits on trampolines bounced back at him on Tuesday.

Burgelis, after receiving a concerned message and photo from a constituent, sought to create trampoline placement regulations after learning no such restrictions existed.

“This is something that will protect our young people and people that frankly don’t give a damn about their kids,” said Burgelis to his council colleagues Tuesday.

A photo Burgelis previously circulated showed a backyard trampoline, without a net, next to a white picket fence.

“This ordinance gives the city a mechanism to ensure our kids don’t get speared on a fence post,” said the southwest side alderman. “That sounds like good policy to me. If you disagree with that, vote no.”

And his colleagues did. The proposal failed on a 5-6-4 vote.

“Are we jumping a little too high to regulate what is going on in the city of Milwaukee?” asked Ald. Alex Brower, who also snuck in a bouncing joke.

“This is something that should be dealt with by homeowners and insurance companies,” said Ald. DiAndre Jackson in June.

The council previously held the proposal to allow Burgelis to identify an appropriate amount for a fine. An amendment offered Tuesday would have lowered the fine from $100 per violation to $50. The first violation was to be a warning from the Department of Neighborhood Services; the department that would have been required to enforce the policy on a complaint basis.

“I do think this is a little ‘government gone too far,'” said Ald. Scott Spiker.

Burgelis, Robert Bauman, JoCasta Zamarripa, José G. Pérez and Russell W. Stamper, II voted for the proposal. Brower, Jackson, Spiker, Milele A. Coggs, Sharlen P. Moore and Marina Dimitrijevic voted no. Andrea Pratt, Mark Chambers, Jr., Lamont Westmoreland and Larresa Taylor abstained.

The proposal would have required trampolines without protective netting to maintain a 20-foot clearance from overhead objects, including power lines and tree limbs, and to be placed at least 15 feet from any permanent structures or objects, such as buildings and fences. Trampolines with protective netting could be placed within five feet of obstructions, or even closer if the manufacturer’s instructions allow it.

Legislation Link - Urban Milwaukee members see direct links to legislation mentioned in this article. Join today

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Comments

  1. mkeumkenews09 says:

    Not too sure about all the joking on this.

    My friend who had a trampoline accident 50 years ago and was a quadraplegic for the rest of his life, might disagree with the naysayers on this one.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us