Court Finds Probable Cause In Spencer Misconduct Case
Court declines to dismiss felony and misdemeanor charges against former city attorney.
Former city attorney Tearman Spencer made his initial appearance before a court Tuesday afternoon, seeking to have charges of misconduct in office and obstruction of justice dismissed.
The charges, which stem from his single term as city attorney from 2020 to 2024, were not dismissed and his case will go to trial. His attorney, William F. Sulton, argued none of his actions were inconsistent with the day-to-day duties of the office and that the allegations against him do not amount to a crime.
“I think if you actually talk to lawyers about what lawyering actually is, there’s no there there,” said
As city attorney, Spencer served as the chief legal counsel for the City of Milwaukee and its constituent government agencies. The office leads a team of approximately three dozen attorneys.
Spencer was charged in October with one count of felony misconduct in public office, which carries potential penalties of up to a $10,000 fine and three and a half years of incarceration; and one count of misdemeanor obstructing an officer, with potential penalties of up to a $10,000 fine and nine months imprisonment. Spencer will not be held in custody and will be booked this week on a $2,000 signature bond.
The case will go before a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge for a “de novo” hearing, which will allow Spencer’s attorney to argue once more against the state’s case for probable cause.
The Milwaukee County District Attorney’s office is alleging Spencer used his discretionary power to “obtain a dishonest advantage for another.” Specifically, it’s alleged he attempted to use his power to avoid inspection fees from the Department of Neighborhood Services (DNS) for a property he rented at 3030 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. to store his collection of vehicles, as Urban Milwaukee previously reported.
Spencer is alleged to have interfered with a city inspector and directed an assistant city attorney to draft a memo in July 2022 determining that he did not need an occupancy permit to store cars at the property. Spencer was also part of an ownership group that sold the property to current owner Mohammad Arif Ghaffar, in 2019, according to the criminal complaint.
Sulton, who is also president of the ACLU of Wisconsin, argued the allegations outlined in the criminal complaint do not amount to probable cause and asked Court Commissioner Dewey B. Martin to dismiss the charges.
“The allegations in this case are that the city attorney directed subordinates to conduct legal research after receiving the inquiry from a public citizen,” Sulton said. “There’s nothing inconsistent at all with that.”
Assistant District Attorney Nicolas J. Heitman argued Spencer assigned work to his subordinates in a manner that benefited him and that multiple members of his office told law enforcement “that the city attorney should not use city resources for his own personal benefit, and that’s what the complaint alleges here, to the tune of some $5,000 in fines and fees that were attempted to be avoided.”
Heitman also argued that Spencer lied to law enforcement, which by itself amounts to obstruction of justice. Sulton argued that the criminal complaint alleges Spencer told officers he “did not recall” and that he did not lie.
Commissioner Martin declined to dismiss the charges, explaining that there was enough information in the criminal complaint for probable cause.
“I think that these are trial issues,” he said.
After the hearing, Sulton told the media the case against Spencer was baseless, and he’s confident a circuit court judge will dismiss the charges.
Asked why the D.A.’s office charged his client, Sulton said, “I think the D.A.’s office likes cases that generate news coverage.”
Government lawyers receive requests from the public or outside lawyers all the time, Sulton said. That Spencer had a personal connection to the matter does not amount to criminal activity, he said.
“The legal profession itself is a social profession,” Sulton said. “There’s nothing untoward or unusual about this at all.”
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the Turmoil at the City Attorney's Office
- Court Finds Probable Cause In Spencer Misconduct Case - Graham Kilmer - Nov 5th, 2024
- Former City Attorney Tearman Spencer Charged with Felony Misconduct - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 2nd, 2024
- Tearman Spencer’s Deputy Criminally Charged With Misconduct in Public Office - Jeramey Jannene - Jun 27th, 2024
- Evan Goyke Ousts Tearman Spencer As City Attorney - Jeramey Jannene - Apr 2nd, 2024
- City Spends $77,000 To Resolve Harassment Claim Against Spencer - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 19th, 2024
- City Hall: Milwaukee Will Pay More Than $60,000 To Settle Tearman Spencer Harassment Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 21st, 2024
- How Will Council Handle Scathing Report on City Attorney? - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2023
- City Attorney Spencer Faces Inspector’s Call For Ouster, Likely Violation Of Discrimination Law - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 9th, 2023
- City Hall: Another Former Assistant City Attorney Files Discrimination Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 20th, 2023
- City Hall: Former City Attorneys File Discrimination Claims - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2022
Read more about Turmoil at the City Attorney's Office here
City Hall
-
Council Puts Milwaukee Flag Debate on Ice
Nov 6th, 2024 by Jeramey Jannene -
Committee Marks Up Milwaukee Budget With Amendments, Footnotes
Oct 31st, 2024 by Jeramey Jannene -
Milwaukee To Issue More Parking Tickets at Higher Prices in 2025
Oct 30th, 2024 by Jeramey Jannene