Milwaukee Needs New Kind of School Board
Higher pay and city-wide elections on high-turnout election days would strengthen board.
With Milwaukee Public Schools’ financial scandal, our elected school board has been exposed as ill equipped to effectively oversee the state’s largest district. Several school governance reforms have been proposed, from breaking up the district to a mayoral takeover.
In hindsight, it was only a matter of time before something like this happened. The governance model of MPS is not conducive to overseeing a $1.5 billion enterprise, especially with all of the issues that our district has. To be straightforward, our board members are a bunch of amateurs. Mostly former educators or activists (noble callings, all), they do not have the skills, knowledge, or abilities required to steer this massive ship, which is why they were caught so flat-footed when the news of MPS’s malfeasance broke.
I propose a new governance model. One that has the benefits of a democratically elected board, but also the benefits of expert oversight. One that would increase accountability to include other levels of government, without a city, county or state takeover. This model would encourage the city’s best, most high caliber candidates to rise up and lead our district out of this mire.
The model would consist of seven full-time, well paid school board members. Four of them would be elected in city-wide elections that would coincide with presidential and gubernatorial elections to maximize voter participation. Gone would be the school board “districts” which limit the candidate pool and leads to “bringing home the bacon” at the expense of the larger system. If the northwest side schools are doing poorly, all of the elected board members are accountable to the voters.
The strength of this model is that we get a larger, city-wide candidate pool for these elected positions. The balance of power would be biased towards those directly elected by the people, hence four of the seven seats. But there would also be a hedge against amateurish incompetence with the three appointed members. Accountability would be increased as every elected board member must now answer for the quality of all the schools city-wide, rather than just their little district. The mayor, governor, and state superintendent would now share in that accountability, as they would now have direct impact on MPS through their appointees. They would now be encouraged to use their bully pulpit to call attention to issues on the board, as they would now be partly responsible.
The money we would spend on this new model would be a drop in the bucket compared to the money we are flushing down the toilet due to this financial scandal, as well as other, more typical inefficiencies and bloat that the current board doesn’t have the competence or time to detect. This, I believe, is the best way forward for MPS. The children of Milwaukee deserve the cream of the crop, the best of the best. This isn’t an easy district to govern, and we need to stop pretending that it can be a side-gig for dilettantes.
Jordan Morales is a resident of Milwaukee in the Sherman Park neighborhood.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
Op-Ed
-
Unlocking Milwaukee’s Potential Through Smart Zoning Reform
Jul 5th, 2024 by Ariam Kesete -
We Energies’ Natural Gas Plans Are A Mistake
Jun 28th, 2024 by John Imes -
Another Medicaid Miss For Wisconsin
Jun 2nd, 2024 by State Rep. Robyn Vining
At one time, all financial aspects of MPS were handled by the office of the Secretary/Business Manager that answered directly to the School Board while the Superintendent dealt with all educational issues. There were never any problems with this dual separation of responsibilities. When Howard Fuller became Superintendent, one of his demands was that the Office of Secretary Business Manager be put under his control so he could be the CEO. This was done and the groundwork was laid for the current financial disaster. Poorly thought out policy decisions by persons who claim to be school “reformers” can have bad consequences.
Mingus hit the nail on the head. There is a need to separate the financial from the educational responsibilities and high top notch people for both roles. Merging the responsibilities was a political decision made many years ago and by any measure has been a failure. Unless, of course, the original plan was to put MPS on the rocks over time.
What about performance pay for the Superintendent?
Base pay is $80,000 per year.
Additional pay in the form of bonuses based on improved student outcomes, i.e., test results, attendance, graduation rates, etc.