Graham Kilmer
MKE County

Wrong Paperwork Gets County Board Candidate Tossed From Ballot

Ryan Antczak, a former Republican state Assembly candidate, circulated the wrong paperwork for nomination signatures.

By - Jan 5th, 2024 04:40 pm
Milwaukee County Courthouse. Photo by Graham Kilmer.

Milwaukee County Courthouse. Photo by Graham Kilmer.

A candidate for Milwaukee County Board in District 12, a southside seat, has been tossed from the ballot despite turning in enough nomination signatures.

Ryan Antczak, a former Republican Assembly candidate, circulated nomination signatures using the wrong paperwork. The Milwaukee County Election Commission reviewed the matter during a meeting Friday. Antczak’s opponent, incumbent Sup. Juan Miguel Martinez, attended the meeting to challenge Antczak’s plea for ballot access.

Antczak can appeal the decision to the Wisconsin Election Commission.

“I’ll be reviewing my options in the best interest of the voters,” he said, “including intensifying my focus on my Aldermanic race.” He is also running for District 8 on the Milwaukee Common Council, challenging the incumbent Alderwoman JoCasta Zamarripa.

Martinez was represented in his challenge by veteran elections attorney Michael Maistelman. “If you want to run for an office that makes law, you have to follow the law,” said the attorney.

When Antczak circulated nomination papers for the non-partisan race, he used nomination forms for a partisan election. There are some differences between the two forms. Notably, one says “Nomination for Partisan Office” and includes a party affiliation.

I thought it was odd,” he said of the forms he circulated, “but I put my party that I felt I associated best with.”

On the partisan nomination papers, there is a box that asks for political affiliation. Antczak wrote Republican, and, as he explained to the election commission, his campaign did not want to get dinged for not filling in a particular box.

County Board and Common Council races are nonpartisan, with candidates running without a party affiliation.

Sup. Deanna Alexander, a conservative, rose to speak in favor of ballot access for Antczak, though not as a formal representative of his campaign. The supervisor argued that while there are differences between the two nomination papers, they are still very similar and that Antczak’s campaign otherwise included all the correct and necessary information.

Martinez’ campaign took a different view. Maistelman argued that the nomination papers are not in compliance with state law, and that the point of these papers is to provide information to citizens who are being asked to support a candidate for office. Antczak’s nomination papers indicated he was running for a partisan seat, he said, and adding information, like a political party, is not appropriate for a nonpartisan race.

The seat that the respondent circulated nomination papers for does not exist,” Maistelman said.

The commission, on party lines, voted 2-1 to remove Antczak from the ballot. Democratic appointees Tim Posnanski and Dawn Martin voted in favor. Republican appointee Helmut Fritz voted in opposition.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Categories: MKE County, Politics

7 thoughts on “MKE County: Wrong Paperwork Gets County Board Candidate Tossed From Ballot”

  1. Ryan Cotic says:

    This is how democracy works in Milwaukee? We look for technicalities to throw people off the ballot as opposed to letting the voters decide? How is this good for the voters?

  2. ZeeManMke says:

    I agree this is BS. Nomination petitions are designed to keep people from running for office. They limit our choices and can only be collected in the busiest month of the year – to say nothing of being exposed to COVID. End the petition scam – that is what it is, a scam. It is the No. 1 reason almost all judges never have an opponent.

  3. dmkrueger2 says:

    From experience, Wisconsin Elections Commission is fair. Its worth elevating to see if they agree with MKE Cnty elections commission.

    I say let Antczak run, he probably loses anyway. *As we can see, Antczak doesn’t really have a plan other than run for any and every office available and hope something works out. And that approach has him missing the details that matter.

  4. kenyatta2009 says:

    look at the paperwork

  5. gwarzyn says:

    Running for two offices at the same time does nor reflect well on one’s character. Just saying…

  6. mkwagner says:

    It appears voters are held to higher standards than those who seek office. Antczak circulated nomination papers for a non-partisan office that included his partisan affiliation. I think the Milwaukee Election Commission did the right thing. They kicked the decision up to the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
    I actually believe we need to hold candidates for elective offices to a higher standard than we currently do. Candidates who cannot get the nomination process correct how are unlikely to provide effective representation. They are running to serve the voters.
    I have no sympathy for Antszak. His campaign screwed up. His opponent’s did not. Making exceptions for Antczak only rewards incompetence. Let the WEC overturn MEC’s decision, Hopefully Antczak’s campaign has learned their lessons.

  7. Colin says:

    If a democrat made this mistake, I’m sure Ryan would’ve been just as interested in upholding such “democracy”.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us