Why Gableman Courts Controversy
His latest blowup in the courtroom is part of a pattern.
They were both appointed Circuit Court judges by Republican governors. But that’s where the similarities ended.
One of the two was former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who had been appointed a Burnett County Circuit Court Judge by Republican Gov. Scott McCallum in 2002, and had a bad day on June 10. Gableman’s tantrum was in public, in response to a subpoena requiring him to be in the courtroom of Dane County Circuit Court Judge Frank Remington, a 2011 appointee of Republican Gov. Scott Walker,
Remington, son of a revered UW-Madison Law School professor and an assistant attorney general for 24 years before Walker named him a judge, admonished Gableman. “You had a courtroom in Burnett County. You had a courtroom in the East Wing of the state Capitol. I do not need to tell you how I expect you to control yourself and your behavior that I expect of a witness on this stand,” Remington said. “No question has been asked of you. You are not given the opportunity to make a speech.”
Gableman said he was frustrated by how the case was being handled, and accused Remingon of favoring Christa Westerberg, the lawyer for the liberal watchdog group, American Oversight, which had sued Gableman to make public records compiled as part of his investigation into how the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin was conducted. Gableman was hired by Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos to conduct the investigation.
“You want to put me in jail, Judge Remington. I’m not going to be railroaded,” Gableman added. “I thought the only issue at play in this whole thing was 97 documents we were late getting over to Ms. Westerberg … Now I find out your intent is to let her do a fishing expedition.”
“If Gableman’s behavior on the witness stand was not enough, during a short recess, he made clear what he thought of the judge and opposing counsel,” referring to comments by Gableman picked up by a courtroom microphone in which he said Remington would let Westerberg decide his decision.
Remington also said he would refer Gableman’s conduct to the Office of Lawyer Regulation, which is overseen by the Supreme Court he served on for 10 years.
Remington said Gableman’s comments about Westerberg were “misogynistic” and unprofessional. And, a section of the Supreme Court’s code of conduct for attorneys says: “A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge.”
That courtroom drama — a Circuit Court judge publicly lecturing a former state Supreme Court justice on protocols — is rare.
But Gableman has been controversial going back two decades, since his 2002 appointment by McCallum, which came after Gableman made fund-raising calls for the GOP governor who lost his election bid that year. When Gableman ran for the Supreme Court in 2008, he approved a racial-themed ad against Justice Louis Butler – the first African-American justice – that prompted a formal misconduct complaint that the ads were false and misleading. The other six justices split, leaving the complaint unresolved. Gableman was seen by many conservatives as too controversial to win a second term and decided to not seek re-election in 2018.
Was Gableman’s picque prompted by Vos picking Millis – and not Gableman – for the state elections commission?
Steven Walters started covering the Capitol in 1988. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
The State of Politics
House Districts’ Maps Protect IncumbentsJun 13th, 2022 by Steven Walters
‘Telling The Truth’ Led to Knudson ResignationJun 6th, 2022 by Steven Walters
Vos Doing Doors, Faces ChallengerMay 30th, 2022 by Steven Walters
3 thoughts on “The State of Politics: Why Gableman Courts Controversy”
Hopefully this article will be one of the last on Judge Gableman, Wisconsin’s most prominent judicial village idiot. As the saying goes, you can’t fix stupid. I think the media’s coverage of Gableman’s every idiotic antic has taken away coverage that should have been focused on the Wisconsin Republican’s refusal to engage in meaningful discussion about gun safety, forever chemicals in our water, reproductive rights and their belief in conspiracy theories.
And the Gableman clown show continues….on our dime. Vos, when does this sick charade end?
Fiscal responsability at its best