381 Cases of COVID-19 in Wisconsin, 4 Deaths
"Stay at home," says Governor Tony Evers in simple message on how Wisconsinites can help.
COVID-19. Credit: U.S. Army.
The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Wisconsin continues to rise.
A total of 381 individuals have now tested positive for the disease, up from 281 yesterday according to the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS). As of Sunday, four deaths had been reported in Wisconsin as a result of the disease.
The number of negative tests also continues to rise, the count is now at 6230, up from yesterday’s total of 4,628.
The numbers don’t tell the whole story of how the pandemic is playing out because of the shortage of testing supplies, turnaround time in getting test results back and lag time in hoped impact of public gathering restrictions put in place by state and local officials.
The state issued a memo earlier this week that established a four-tier testing system intended to make sure the highest risk individuals are tested. Tests have been primarily processed by two public health labs, one at UW-Madison and another operated by the Milwaukee Health Department, but private labs are adding capacity.
Individuals experiencing no or mild symptoms may never be tested. “There is no need to test people that are not having symptoms,” said Dr. Ryan Westergaard, Chief Medical Officer of the Bureau of Communicable Diseases, on Tuesday. “Unless you’re experiencing shortness of breath, it’s not a medical emergency,” said Milwaukee Health Commissioner Jeanette Kowalik in laying out who should be tested during a media briefing this week.
But that doesn’t mean the individuals aren’t spreading the disease and putting others at risk. Six counties, including Milwaukee County, are now reporting “community transmission” indicating that officials cannot trace the origin of a new case to an existing one.
Governor Tony Evers delivered a simple message to Wisconsinites during a briefing Friday, “stay at home.”.
DHS, through its Twitter account, suggested people can go outside, but must maintain “social distancing” of six feet from others. The most common way the disease is believed to spread is through “respiratory droplets” when an infected person coughs or sneezes. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website offers guidance on how the disease spreads and how individuals can protect themselves and others.
For more on the strategy to “flatten the curve” and ensure enough intensive care unit facilities are available in hospitals, see our coverage from yesterday.
Wisconsin COVID-19 Test Results
| Test Results | Number of People as of 3/22/2020 |
|---|---|
| Negative | 6230 |
| Positive | 381 |
| Deaths | 4 |
Number of Positive Results by County
| Wisconsin County | Total Cases as of 3/22/2020 | Total Deaths as of 3/22/2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Bayfield | 1 | 0 |
| Brown* | 3 | 0 |
| Calumet | 1 | 0 |
| Chippewa | 1 | 0 |
| Columbia* | 5 | 0 |
| Dane* | 61 | 0 |
| Douglas | 1 | 0 |
| Dunn | 1 | 0 |
| Eau Claire | 4 | 0 |
| Fond du Lac | 16 | 1 |
| Green | 1 | 0 |
| Jefferson | 2 | 0 |
| Kenosha* | 10 | 0 |
| La Crosse | 5 | 0 |
| Marathon | 1 | 0 |
| Milwaukee* | 182 | 2 |
| Outagamie | 2 | 0 |
| Ozaukee | 13 | 1 |
| Pierce | 1 | 0 |
| Racine | 4 | 0 |
| Rock | 3 | 0 |
| Sauk | 2 | 0 |
| Sheboygan | 6 | 0 |
| St. Croix | 2 | 0 |
| Walworth | 3 | 0 |
| Washington | 14 | 0 |
| Waukesha* | 30 | 0 |
| Winnebago | 5 | 0 |
| Wood | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 381 | 4 |
* An asterisk indicates community spread has been identified.
About the Data
A variety of testing totals are shared every day. Urban Milwaukee uses the daily DHS website update at 2 p.m. as its primary reporting measure. Milwaukee County updates its tracking website at 7:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. each day.
For more on the COVID-19 pandemic, see our topic page aggregating our articles and press releases from politicians, businesses and other organizations.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.
More about the Coronavirus Pandemic
- WI Daily: Wisconsin Reports Biggest One-Day COVID-19 Case Increase - Jeramey Jannene - Jul 4th, 2020
- Beware of Contact Tracing Scams - Bridgit Bowden - Jul 4th, 2020
- WI Daily: COVID-19 Spread Keeps Accelerating in Wisconsin - Jeramey Jannene - Jul 3rd, 2020
- Milwaukee Moves Backward In Fight Against COVID-19 - Jeramey Jannene - Jul 3rd, 2020
- State Unemployment Insurance System Failing Many - Bram Sable-Smith - Jul 3rd, 2020
- Racial Disparities Found in Safer-At-Home Arrests - Edgar Mendez - Jul 3rd, 2020
- Johnson Discusses Small Business Recovery at Axios Virtual Event - U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson - Jul 3rd, 2020
- The City of Milwaukee Phase 4 Assessment Update - City of Milwaukee Health Department - Jul 3rd, 2020
- WI Daily: 14-Day Positive Case Rate Continues Upward Climb - Jeramey Jannene - Jul 2nd, 2020
- City Hall: What Should Or Shouldn’t Be in Milwaukee Mask Mandate? - Jeramey Jannene - Jul 2nd, 2020
Read more about Coronavirus Pandemic here
I am very supportive of the emphasis on social/spatial distancing and associated restrictions.
I also understand why, at the present time, we need to limit testing for the virus.
However, as this article states “that doesn’t mean the {asymptomatic} individuals aren’t spreading the disease and putting others at risk.”
It’s my understanding that at some point, when adequate testing capacity is available, it will be optimal to test practically everyone who hasn’t been identified as infected, in order to determine who should receive humane quarantine, and if necessary, treatment, so that those who haven’t been infected can return safely to normal behavior. This would also allow for intense contact tracing pertaining to those who do in fact present as infected,
My concern: the messaging that surrounds the current, and unfortunately, necessary, rationing of testing might eventually result in confusion or resistance to a community-wide testing regimen when that becomes feasible. If my understanding is indeed correct, perhaps this can be incorporated into the public health guidance. Something along the line of “not now, but possibly later” for those without symptoms.