Elections Commission Stands Up for Voters
By resisting judge’s order to purge voter rolls, state commission resists voter suppression.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission on Monday did the right thing by waiting to purge 234,000 voters from the rolls.
On Friday, Ozaukee County Judge Paul Malloy ordered the Commission to do the purge, but the Commission on Monday, on a 3-3 vote along party lines, decided not to go ahead with the purge – at least not yet.
The Democrats on the commission said it would be “irresponsible” to purge those names “if a Court of Appeals judge issues an emergency stay, meaning the registrations would need to be reactivated,” the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported.
It’s crucial that the appellate court get to hear the appeal, either by the Elections Commission or by the League of Women Voters, whom Judge Malloy, without good reason, would not allow into the case.
There are several things wrong with this ruling.
First, this particular provision of the law was a blatant attempt to make it harder for people to vote, most notably certain Democratic voters. Judge Malloy’s order seemingly corroborates this since, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the majority of individuals on the list were registered in college towns and Milwaukee and Madison, all of which tend to be Democratic strongholds. Students, poor people, and people of color congregate in these Democratic-leaning places.
Second, the partisan nature of this assault on Wisconsin voters is obvious not just because it came from the Wisconsin Institute of Law & Liberty but also because two of the three plaintiffs are major donors to Wisconsin Republicans.
For instance, Timothy Zignego, head of the Zignego road construction company, donated $14,200 to Republican candidates in Wisconsin since 1993.
David Opitz, himself a former Republican State Assembly member and State Senator, donated $8,095 since 1993.
(The third plaintiff, Frederick Luehrs III, has not donated, according to the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign’s database.)
Finally, the rationale for this lawsuit is based on a trumped up fear of legions of ghost voters waiting in the wings to illegally steal an election by voting in districts they are not registered to vote in, or voting more than once. This fear has been debunked by a myriad of studies that have found almost zero evidence of voter fraud in Wisconsin and nationwide.
Making it harder for people to vote in a democracy is a disgrace.
Frankly, the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty and its plaintiffs may prevail on appeal, since it’s bound to reach the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which tilts heavily in the conservative direction, to put it mildly.
But at least there would be an opportunity at the appellate level to review the arguments, and to allow the League of Women Voters a chance to enter the case.
If ultimately the Wisconsin Elections Commission is forced to go ahead with the purge, it has a moral obligation not only to notify all 234,000 voters that it is doing so but also to let them know, clearly and succinctly, what they’ll need to do to re-register.
And while I’m angry at Judge Malloy’s decision and at the anti-democratic (small “d”) behavior of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, I’m not despondent.
Why not?
Because I know there is tremendous grassroots organizing going on right now – by the League of Women Voters, by Wisconsin Voices, by Leaders Igniting Transformation, and by many others – to register and engage voters in Wisconsin.
Together, their work may prove more decisive than the hackery of the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty.
Matthew Rothschild is executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.
More about the 2020 Voter Purge
- Murphy’s Law: WILL’s Harvard Lawyers Fail at Voter Purge - Bruce Murphy - Apr 12th, 2021
- State Supreme Court Tosses Voter Purge Suit - Shawn Johnson - Apr 9th, 2021
- WILL President Rick Esenberg on Supreme Court Decision in Zignego v. WEC - Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty - Apr 9th, 2021
- WEC Statement Regarding Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision - Wisconsin Elections Commission - Apr 9th, 2021
- High Court Urged to Okay 5% Error Rate in Voter Purge - Henry Redman - Sep 30th, 2020
- Court to Rule on Purging 130,000 from Voter Rolls - Laurel White - Sep 29th, 2020
- League of Women Voters of Wisconsin Files Brief to Protect Registered Voters from Polling List Purge - League of Women Voters of Wisconsin - Jul 14th, 2020
- State High Court Narrows Chance of Voter Purge - Laurel White - Jul 1st, 2020
- Voter Purge Push Threatens 129,000 Names - Michael Parsky, Kynala Phillips and Dana Munro - Jun 14th, 2020
- Op Ed: Dan Kelly Wants Revenge - Matt Rothschild - Jun 2nd, 2020
Read more about 2020 Voter Purge here
Op-Ed
-
Unlocking Milwaukee’s Potential Through Smart Zoning Reform
Jul 5th, 2024 by Ariam Kesete -
We Energies’ Natural Gas Plans Are A Mistake
Jun 28th, 2024 by John Imes -
Milwaukee Needs New Kind of School Board
Jun 26th, 2024 by Jordan Morales
I guess we dont have to follow laws anymore!?
I don’t agree that the law is so clear. It does not specify how soon after the 39 day response period the voters name must be removed nor does it prohibit follow up measures before actual removal.