Morales Blames ACLU Suit for Traffic Ticket Drop
Police Chief says stop-and-frisk settlement caused decline. But some question this.
Milwaukee police officials during budget hearings attributed the decline in city traffic citations this year to the city’s settlement in the ACLU’s stop-and-frisk lawsuit.
Dangerous driving has become a major issue in Milwaukee, outraging many residents.
While attributing the decline in citations to the ACLU, however, police failed to note that the number of tickets issued in the city has been declining for years except for significant jumps in 2017 and 2018 – the year the ACLU’s lawsuit was filed and the year it was settled.
“We’re not doing the flooded over-policing area where we’re measured on our activity on traffic and subject stops that resulted in citations,” he said.
Morales, at the committee meeting, acknowledged that police previously stopped and cited people for reasons other than the violations they committed.
Police now are “actually pulling the person over that actually is speeding or doing something reckless…. So those are the people that are getting the tickets – We’re not just – again, that whole Center Street corridor, where we’re stopping a minivan because, a Dodge Carava(n) – a mini-van because it’s high steal, and we’re stopping every Dodge Caravan and giving them a ticket….Those are all things that came across in the agreement with the ACLU lawsuit.”
Molly Collins, advocacy director of the ACLU of Wisconsin, said Wednesday that “there’s nothing in the settlement that stops police from enforcing the law.”
The lawsuit, she said, was “not about them enforcing the law, but about them breaking the law.”
Police officials, during the committee meeting, also said the Sheriff’s Department was writing more tickets, and citations may be reflected in county statistics.
Ald. Milele Coggs, committee chair, expressed some doubt that the department’s past traffic stop policies would result in speeding tickets. Those practices likely would result in different types of citations, she said.
Police Inspector Terrence Gordon acknowledged that the settlement did not preclude the department from using any single tool, but said police were less reliant on stops as an overall strategy. When the number of stops was de-emphasized, he said, the number of tickets issued “fell off the face of the Earth.”
Officers also are less likely to issue multiple citations for a single stop and are more likely to write a citation for only the most significant violation, officials said.
Gretchen Schuldt writes a blog for Wisconsin Justice Initiative, whose mission is “To improve the quality of justice in Wisconsin by educating the public about legal issues and encouraging civic engagement in and debate about the judicial system and its operation.
- City Hall: Mixed Results on ACLU Settlement Compliance - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 26th, 2020
- City Hall: Committee Demands Stop-and-Frisk Plan - Gretchen Schuldt - Mar 2nd, 2020
- Mayor Tom Barrett released the following statement regarding the ACLU lawsuit report: - Mayor Tom Barrett - Feb 20th, 2020
- 38% of Police Stops Not Fully Documented - Alana Watson - Feb 19th, 2020
- Morales Blames ACLU Suit for Traffic Ticket Drop - Gretchen Schuldt - Nov 18th, 2019
- City Hall: MPD Complying With ACLU Settlement - Jeramey Jannene - Apr 5th, 2019
- ACLU Attempts to End Stop-And-Frisk Policing - Edgar Mendez - Oct 18th, 2018
- Court Watch: 16 Court Reforms of Police Department - Gretchen Schuldt - Aug 14th, 2018
- Will Settlement Change Police Practices? - Andrea Waxman - Jul 25th, 2018
- City Hall: Stop-and-Frisk Suit Could Cost $6 Million - Jeramey Jannene - May 8th, 2018
Read more about Stop-and-Frisk Lawsuit here