Wisconsin Public Radio
Derailed

Decision to Refuse Train Funding “Purely Political”

LaHood says Walker wanted to kill a Democratic plan created by Doyle and Obama. Part 4 of series.

By , Wisconsin Public Radio - Oct 27th, 2019 10:56 am
Get a daily rundown of the top stories on Urban Milwaukee
Ray LaHood. Photo is in the Public Domain.

Ray LaHood. Photo is in the Public Domain.

When President Barack Obama signed the federal stimulus bill into law in 2009 — and $8 billion was made available for high-speed rail — U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood was hopeful.

The former Republican congressman from Peoria, Illinois, said the public had an interest in high-speed rail, and as secretary, he played a key role in how that $8 billion was distributed.

He was there from the very beginning — when Wisconsin was awarded $810 million for a high-speed rail line between Madison and Milwaukee, to the end, when then newly-elected Gov. Scott Walker put a stop to it.

In the making of WPR’s “Derailed,” Bridgit Bowden and Shawn Johnson interviewed LaHood. One thing they discovered was that Walker’s decision to decline the high-speed rail funding is something LaHood never forgot.

This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.  

Shawn Johnson: It looked like it all happened very quickly. Do you know why Wisconsin’s project specifically, went from kind of a pipe dream to here we are and here’s an $810 million project for Wisconsin?

Ray LaHood: I think the reason for that is that when we decided to implement rail projects in America under President Obama and Vice President Biden’s leadership … we were looking for governors, we were looking for partners around the country who had projects but could spend the money and get people to work.

We found a number of governors who wanted to invest in rail and so we were anxious to do that. And (Gov.) Jim Doyle was a good partner.

SJ: When you were secretary … you visited Watertown — it looks like it was in July of 2010 — and you were quoted at the time as saying “high-speed rail is coming to Wisconsin. There’s no stopping it.” and I remember this creating kind of a stir at the time. Why did you say that? 

RL: Because I knew there was a gubernatorial election and I knew that Walker was making noises about not being that interested in it. And I wanted to send a message that this is what the people wanted … This was a once in a lifetime opportunity to really garner the resources necessary to implement this rail line.

Bridgit Bowden: So … you’re saying Walker was making noise about this. … What do you think was behind that sort of backlash? 

RL: I think it was purely political. I think the fact that it was Obama’s idea … Walker was a Republican, ran as a Republican. The idea that it was Gov. Doyle’s idea, the idea that it was Obama, Doyle, kind of a collaboration. I can think of no other reason why they would turn back that kind of money.

SJ: Do you think there was a moment when Wisconsin’s high-speed rail project ended? … I mean as you think back about it … was there a point in time when you know you basically pulled the plug on it or you were convinced that it was dead? 

RL: The moment that the high-speed rail project was dead was when Walker decided he didn’t want the money. And he told me that.

SJ: When did he tell you that? Where was the conversation? 

RL: I don’t know. It might have been a phone conversation. I’m not sure. But it was in some kind of a conversation that he and I had. I mean he made it really clear. He wanted to use the money for other purposes. And I said there’s plenty of money to do other things. This is high-speed rail money. This is to develop rail in Wisconsin. And he turned a deaf ear to all of that.

SJ: I remember during that campaign he kept saying he wanted to use this money for roads in Wisconsin instead. Did he ever raise that with you? And you know, why couldn’t he do that?      

RL: Of course he raised that with me. And what I said was what I said earlier:

‘Governor, there’s plenty of money for roads and bridges in another pot. This is the high-speed rail pot of money and you can’t be diverting that money to roads.

‘We’ll help you with roads but we’ll do it the right way, the way it should be done, by the book, not trying to do things that can’t be done.’

He could have had both.

SJ: Months after Gov. Walker was sworn in Wisconsin lost out on a $150 million grant for funding for Amtrak’s Hiawatha line between Milwaukee and Chicago. Did Gov. Walker’s position on the high-speed rail money between Madison and Milwaukee have anything to do with your decision with the Hiawatha funding? 

RL: Absolutely. It had everything to do with my decision. And I think if you go back and look and see what I said … what I said was ‘We’re looking for reliable partners.’

‘We need reliable partners when we grant money to governors.’ … That money has to be for the purpose it is intended and the fact that he turned down millions of dollars for a rail project and then comes right back with something else … our feeling was that he was not going to be a reliable partner the way that other governors were.

This is part of WPR’s “Derailed,” a limited-run podcast about Wisconsin’s high-speed rail line that never was. It’s a look at how the project came together, how it fell apart, and what it says about how Wisconsin has changed. Never miss an episode by subscribing now on your favorite podcast app or at wpr.org/derailed.

Former US Transportation Secretary: Decision To Deny Train Funding Was ‘Purely Political’ was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.

3 thoughts on “Derailed: Decision to Refuse Train Funding “Purely Political””

  1. Ryan Cotic says:

    Wow, thank god scott walker turned down that money. California’s train sounds like a mess

  2. TransitRider says:

    Ryan Cotic, comparing the Madison train to California’s HSR is like comparing apples and oranges.

    California is building to support operation of several trains/HOUR at 220 mph; Wisconsin would have just 6 trains/DAY at 110 mph.

    California’s trains will be electric (with expensive new electrical infrastructure) while Wisconsin’s would have been diesel.

    California is building a railroad from scratch—every foot of land must be purchased from individual private landowners—a process that is proving more expensive and time-consuming than projected.

    The entire Madison train route already has active railroad track and would require almost no land acquisition; Wisconsin’s major expense would have been upgrading that existing track to 110 mph (not cheap since about half of that existing track is currently unsafe above 10 mph).

  3. Dave Reid says:

    @TransitRider Thanks. These are facts that are often ignored. The truth is the the two projects were vastly different and the only real connection was that California got Wisconsin’s money.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us