Evers Joins Unions on Lame Duck Suit
GOP bill require 200,000 state agency reports to legislature, his lawyers contend.
Gov. Tony Evers has sided with unions in a lawsuit seeking to overturn laws Republicans passed in December’s lame-duck session, asking a judge to block the laws immediately.
Attorneys for Evers — who is officially a defendant in the case — told the court in a brief submitted Wednesday that GOP lawmakers had substantially interfered with Evers’ powers as governor, which are guaranteed by the state constitution.
“The legislation drastically narrowed the power of these executive offices in favor of the Republican Legislature, or in some cases, a subset of the Legislature,” wrote Evers’ lawyers in a brief filed in Dane County Circuit Court. “This transparent and rushed attempt to stymie the incoming administrations went too far.”
The lawsuit filed by the Service Employees International Union and others in organized labor contends Republicans violated the state constitution’s separation of powers guarantees by granting too much executive power to the Legislature.
“A conservative estimate is that there are over 200,000 existing agency guidance documents across state government,” Evers’ brief reads. “Agencies will also have to delay other projects and duties in order to comply with the guidance document requirements.”
The governor’s lawyers contend the new requirements will also result in some guidance documents not being published.
“A major task of most agencies is to administer the law and help individuals, businesses, local governments and those subject to regulation understand the law and how it applies to them,” the brief reads. “The ultimate impact will fall on those who rely on government interpretations of the law for services and help, including the unemployed and disabled.”
The SEIU lawsuit is one of three cases that have been filed against the lame-duck session.
The other lawsuit filed in state court is based entirely on a procedural argument. That case, filed by the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin among other groups, argues that because the constitution does not explicitly allow for extraordinary sessions of the Legislature, the entire session was unlawful.
The third case, which is in federal court, is challenging early voting restrictions passed as part of the lame-duck session. A judge sided with plaintiffs in that case, putting the restrictions on hold.
Hearings in the two state lawsuits are scheduled for March.
Evers Sides With Unions In Lame-Duck Lawsuit was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
- Four Years Later, State’s Lame Duck Law Still Faces Court Challenge - Shawn Johnson - Jan 17th, 2023
- Judge Rules Against Law Giving Legislators Power Over Attorney General Settlements - Shawn Johnson - May 11th, 2022
- State Supreme Court Dismisses AG’s Lame-Duck Lawsuit - Ruth Conniff - Mar 25th, 2021
- Kaul Sues Legislature Over Lame Duck Laws - Melanie Conklin - Nov 24th, 2020
- AG Kaul Announces Legal Action to Allow DOJ to Again Enforce Wisconsin Laws Without Unconstitutional Legislative Interference - Josh Kaul - Nov 23rd, 2020
- Vos Thinks Lame-Duck Session Didn’t Go Far Enough - Melanie Conklin - Jul 31st, 2020
- The State of Politics: Court Rulings Against Evers Sow Confusion - Steven Walters - Jul 20th, 2020
- Court Tosses Dems’ Lame-Duck Suit - Laurel White - Jul 16th, 2020
- Op Ed: State High Court Nullifies 2018 Election - James Rowen - Jul 12th, 2020
- WI Supreme Court Upholds GOP Lame-Duck Laws - Laurel White - Jul 9th, 2020
Read more about Lame Duck Laws here