Danielle Kaeding

Great Lakes Compact Council Passes Changes

But region’s mayors, native tribes, call for more input on water withdrawals.

By , Wisconsin Public Radio - Dec 7th, 2018 03:35 pm
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
Great Lakes. Photo from the NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (CC-BY-SA).

Great Lakes. Photo from the NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (CC-BY-SA).

A council that manages and protects the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin is changing the rules for communities that want to withdraw and use water outside the watershed.

But Great Lakes mayors and environmental groups say the changes don’t go far enough to strengthen a multi-state agreement governing use of the lakes’ water supply.

Eight Great Lakes governors passed the Great Lakes Compact in 2008 to protect the lakes from the threat of water diversions outside the basin. The council overseeing the compact, which is made up of the states’ governors or designees, approved changes Thursday on how proposed withdrawals are reviewed and council decisions are appealed.

John Dickert, former Racine mayor and president of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, said the changes don’t allow enough public input on diversions.

“One of the biggest issues that we were looking for was a mandatory public hearing in each state. If you really want people to shed the light on what’s going on, then you simply hold a public hearing in each state and each province,” Dickert said. “But, they decided not to do that and instead just said (they will hold hearings) if it’s of interest. Well, I think Great Lakes water is of interest to everyone.”

Environmental groups like the National Wildlife Federation and Alliance for the Great Lakes provided comments on the rules and procedures set to be adopted. They thanked council members for their work to develop guidance for withdrawals while noting procedures could have strengthened opportunities for public comment and removed financial barriers to filing appeals of council decisions.

“While a filing fee is a much reduced and improvement from the possibility of bearing … the full council administrative cost of an appeals process as previously included, it is still an unprecedented element based on our research and an undue burden upon those parties who are aggrieved,” said Todd Brennan, senior policy manager for the Alliance for the Great Lakes. “The whole application and preliminary appeals process has proper checks and balances in place to limit an appeals request already.”

First Nations and tribes have also said they would like a greater role in the council’s consideration of water diversions, said Cameron Welch, policy analyst for Canada’s Anishinabek Nation.

“We must recognize that First Nations and tribes are not simply stakeholders but also have jurisdiction over the lakes,” he said. “Certainly, the Anishinabek position is that we never ceded our rights to lake beds and waters through treaty. Therefore, we have jurisdiction that remains with us.”

Grant Trigger, the compacts’s representative for Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, said the compact council is committed to reducing any concerns over water withdrawals moving forward.

“I think you’ve heard resounding comments today to the effect that there is a commitment — another commitment — to continue dialogue with stakeholders because I think we have collectively learned from this process we produce a better product,” Trigger said. “Even if it’s still bad, it’s better than terrible and that we can continue to improve on what we have in front of us going forward and there’s a commitment to do that.”

Dickert said the Great Lakes mayors plan to meet with incoming governors in each state about their thoughts on ways the compact can be strengthened to make it more difficult to divert water from the basin.

Great Lakes Regional Water Use Report Released

During the meeting, the Great Lakes Commission reported findings about how Great Lakes water was used in the basin last year. Water withdrawals decreased overall across the basin in 2017.

Reilly Manz, program specialist with the Great Lakes Commission, said the total amount of water withdrawn from the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin decreased by less than 1 percent from 42,246 million gallons per day in 2016 to 42,080 million gallons per day in 2017.

The consumptive use, which is the amount of water used and lost from the basin, also declined by about 4 percent from 2,106 million gallons per day in 2016 to 2,015 million gallons per day in 2017.

“Overall, the basin had a net gain of 890 million gallons of water per day in 2017,” said Manz.

Manz noted 79 percent of all the withdrawals across the basin were taken from Great Lakes surface water “with Ontario accounting for 39 percent of those withdrawals and Michigan with 22 percent of those withdrawals.”

The Lake Michigan watershed had the largest amount of water that was used and not returned to the basin at 811 million gallons per day.

Water withdrawn for cooling in electric power production accounted for 64 percent of the total withdrawals at 26,973 million gallons per day. Withdrawals for the public water supply accounted for 13 percent of the total at 5,366 million gallons per day while withdrawals for industrial purposes accounted for around 11 percent or 4,607 million gallons per day.

Listen to the WPR report here.

Great Lakes Compact Council Approves Changes To Rules Guiding Water Diversions was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.

2 thoughts on “Great Lakes Compact Council Passes Changes”

  1. Thomas Martinsen says:

    It is good to read that First Nations and tribes are being recognized as “wanting greater input on water diversion decisions. Do these possibly most earth friendly peoples among us have designated voices in decision making processes concernng water diversions from The GREAT LAKES?

    Why are the premieres of Ontario and Quebec not mentioned? Do they not have advisory roles or more?

    Michigan’s Governor Snyder’s words in this piece made him sound like a snake in the grass re water diversion. Did he or did he not have something to do with catastrophic water diversion in Flint, Michigan?

  2. Thomas Martinsen says:

    What is new in the process of Waukesha’s effort to divert Lake Michigan water?

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us